DRJosh
Full Member
We're one proper CM away from being a solid team. The McFred combo is painful to watch.
We're one proper CM away from being a solid team. The McFred combo is painful to watch.
If that CM is Ballon D'Or quality then yes.
I think our issues go beyond than just plugging players in.
I just have zero faith in this coaching staff + Ole being good enough to win us titles vs the two best managers in the world.
Oh give over. We're comfortably second. It's become a bit of a myth that we rely on pace, power and moments of brilliance while other top teams rely on patterns of play and a robust system. I'll admit that I'm still not all balls in on Ole, but it's bullshit to pretend we're any different to any top team. We have our moments, we have our foibles. We also have an opportunity in the summer to strengthen those positions which consistently flatter to deceive (CM, RW and CB) and Ole has given us a great pedestal to move forward. We have easily been the second most consistent and devastating team this season (and most entertaining, even with all those bore draws) so there is genuine reason to be optimistic. We've been completely fecked over with 4 games in 8 days, I think the players and managers should be cut some slack.
What individually great goals have we scored this season? We are 2 goals off City, must be some amount of goal of the season contenders to post..all the goals in Europe we scored as well...We have match winners, and most notably, we have Bruno. Tell me what we rely on to break teams down other than individual pieces of brilliance and/or pace and power on the break?
I saw nothing in last night's performance that I haven't seen as a theme throughout the season, only that we were far easier to get at as we seemed content to allow a basketball game to unfold.
Which players have said that?
Half-time speeches
A lot of what the manager shouts from the touchline isn't actually audible to the players on the pitch.
Half-time is when a manager's character can make a difference. Team talks are the stuff of legend.
In the 1966 World Cup final, Alf Ramsey spoke to his team before extra time: "You've won it once. Now you'll have to go out there and win it again."
Perhaps it helped.
But Dr Sik is not convinced that this sort of thing goes on in the dressing room most weekends.
"We've all seen the films where the manager gives a team talk, invokes the memory of a dead player, the martial theme music starts up and that totally turns things round," he says. "It's pretty rare that that actually happens."
He adds that when he interviewed football managers for his book I Think I'll Manage: Football Managers Reveal the Tricks of Their Trade, not one of them gave an example of a half time speech that had changed the course of a match.
Caught up in the excitement and emotion of a game, many parents and coaches feel that they are really helping and supporting their children whilst watching by shouting technical or tactical instruction. Whilst this may on occasions in the short term prove successful there are major long term implications of this for the player.
- It reduces problem solving skills
- It decreases decision making skills
- It reduces creativity in young players
- It reduces the child's enjoyment
- It increases the pressure on the child
- It increases anxiety in the child
- It prevents children from mastering life skills
- It decreases the ability of the child to cope independently (particularly if the parent and the coach are not around)
Like @cyberman said, we've only scored 2 less than Man City. It's just lazy at this point. We are clearly capable, so let's not talk shit.We have match winners, and most notably, we have Bruno. Tell me what we rely on to break teams down other than individual pieces of brilliance and/or pace and power on the break?
I saw nothing in last night's performance that I haven't seen as a theme throughout the season, only that we were far easier to get at as we seemed content to allow a basketball game to unfold.
I wouldn’t draw any conclusions from that.You said we shouldn't draw any conclusions to two home losses back to back, bringing up our total to six, when many fans believe we'll be challenging for a title next season. We also fell off performance wise at the end of last season and the season before.
I would say with no fans in the ground, communication from the manager makes more impact than what it would with a full stadium.https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-42611265
Basically. You shout on the touchline for great image and pose...
This one is for youth coaching perspective...but it is what it is:
https://community.ukcoaching.org/sp.../the-unknown-damage-caused-from-the-touchline
Thats is complete sense. As Cruijff says if you give one option it is going to be blocked. If you give two options maybe it can be blocked but if you give three options, then the opposition cannot block the pass. 4 players normally make a diamond. The player with the ball and the other three players. That shape is then moved all over the pitch with different players making the diamond as the ball is passed among them. Right players in the right space at the right time.
According to him that is the diamond and not how the players line up when they kick off.
This is true at most levels. Half the time you can't even hear what someone is shouting properly.Players have said before whatever the managers shouted during the game, they can't be arsed about it and just nod in agreement.
You coach your team before the matches, the presence in the touch line is just a nuisance.
The passing out from the back against not just pressing teams, but most teams...where to begin?
How many times do you look at the bigger picture, see our defence in a line, then like one midfielder amongst 4 or 5 opposition players? Then you get numpties saying these midfielders are solely to blame for their inability to pass forward. No, that's because they have to perform like Maradonna for a second just to be able to find a pass. And if they don't you end up with...well Fred, basically.
If you want to pass out, you give every man 2 or 3 options within 5 or ten yards until you beat the press. They shouldn't be having to pass 25 or 30 yards when surrounded by opposition players. But we're well coached and "patterns of play" is a load of bollocks...
We don’t have chequebook ownersWe basically have to become what we once hated if we're to progress under Ole...a team that buys their success with a chequebook manager in charge.
Maguire is the only one who can head. I’ve been saying it for ages we don’t put enough emphasis on basic defending when judging defenders especially centre half’sWhilst we have scored plenty of goals this season which is to be highly commended, we are still highly disorganised when defending set pieces (free kicks and corners) and still cannot play out from the back when put under anything like a molecule of pressure. If that’s not awful coaching (or at least naive coaching) , I’m not sure what is.
Citys big game record is shocking and theyre champions?Like I said in the other thread, we've only got 2 wins from 12 games against the comparable teams in the league. 2 from 12. Win percentage 17%.
That sort of form is not going to get us anywhere near a title and it's indicative of not even staying in the top four next season, unless we outspend all our rivals in the summer and actually buy well for a change.
We don’t have chequebook owners
Spot on. I just don't even feel like commenting anymore regarding blatant stuff like this because I'm pretty much over it and accept we'll never be "pretty" to watch under Ole. Last night just got me riled up.
Plus Ole said he'd never play tiki taka football, which I think basically meant he doesn't know how to coach a good possession team. Why wouldn't you want that in your arsenal?
We don’t have chequebook owners
"We are an awfully coached team"
This is definitely true during matches, as Ole just sits in the stands and watches a monitor/ipad of the match.
Compare that to the likes of Pep and Klopp who are on the touchline barking orders - coaching.
Absolutely agree. Seems the coaches leave players to sort out the problem. Last night when Liverpool changed to a high press we were incapable of passing through it so lost control of the game completely. No tactical adjustment until game was gone. Defence all over the place.
Most damning of all is the inability to harness players talent. Pogba is a world class player but does fit into Ole’s pattern Last night when he got desperate and freed Pogba and Bruno we controlled the game for a period. As further evidence, look at the players who have “failed” at Old Trafford but gone elsewhere and starred: lukaku, DiMaria, Lingard, Evans, etc
Only significant difference between City, Liverpool Chelsea and us is the quality and clarity of management and coaching. World class teams need world class managers and coaches. No-one would put our lot anywhere near that level
TheseFor many years, we haven’t really been a team that is more than the sum of our parts. The problem is, as the bar has been raised, our rivals coached by Pep and Klopp have been exactly that. They are less about the brilliance of their individual players than they are about the quality of their unit. And their individuals are pretty good too!
Liverpool and City in recent years have been, I would say, 20-30% better than the simple sum of their parts. That 20-30% accounts for majority, if not all of the difference between them and us. I don’t think their players are as much better as is made out. I don’t think we can look at any of their best performers and confidently say they would have been at the same level if they were at United the last 3 years.
We will always be on the backfoot if our grand plan is to try and bridge that 20-30% gap by simply buying individuals that are 20-30% better than the ones they have. It’s just unlikely to happen. The way it has been in recent years, it’s like we need Mbappé, Neymar, Varane etc to compete. As a collective - nothing special. Which is why; irrespective of result, more often than not in recent years, we play poorly. It’s also why the solution always seems to be in the transfer market. Buy better and better. These players Liverpool and City are buying were of no greater calibre than the ones we buy when all players were at their respective previous clubs. It isn’t like they all just buy the world’s best while we shop in a different market. It’s what happens when they get to these respective clubs that is the main difference.
I agree that we are badly coached. There were several examples of it just last night.
Trying to play out from the back against a team with such an effective press for one thing.
A good coach will identify players strengths & weaknesses and improve a player. Has Olé done so?
I think not.
At best we are threading water under his management.
If that CM is Ballon D'Or quality then yes.
I think our issues go beyond than just plugging players in.
I just have zero faith in this coaching staff + Ole being good enough to win us titles vs the two best managers in the world.
I agree with you, our press has no form, it seems as though we press when it occurs to one of us and others join in if they feel like it. And I miss Ashley Young’s crosses.We don't a collective pressing either. 2 of them go up while 1 of them jog back. We can't pass out from back either or we can't cross.
Agree with that but knowing the sensitivity of large chunks of that forum, I'd add this: Ole does and has done terrific job in consolidating the club and the team. Whoever would take over, has an infinitely better starting position than the one, Ole had to work with.And that's where this whole thing will fall apart. This team needs a manager that can improve the team beyond the sum of its parts. Many managers have done it. Along with wise investment. We'll be stuck in this perpetual stage of rebuild as we are.
You should find another club to root for.
For many years, we haven’t really been a team that is more than the sum of our parts. The problem is, as the bar has been raised, our rivals coached by Pep and Klopp have been exactly that. They are less about the brilliance of their individual players than they are about the quality of their unit. And their individuals are pretty good too!
Liverpool and City in recent years have been, I would say, 20-30% better than the simple sum of their parts. That 20-30% accounts for majority, if not all of the difference between them and us. I don’t think their players are as much better as is made out. I don’t think we can look at any of their best performers and confidently say they would have been at the same level if they were at United the last 3 years.
We will always be on the backfoot if our grand plan is to try and bridge that 20-30% gap by simply buying individuals that are 20-30% better than the ones they have. It’s just unlikely to happen. The way it has been in recent years, it’s like we need Mbappé, Neymar, Varane etc to compete. As a collective - nothing special. Which is why; irrespective of result, more often than not in recent years, we play poorly. It’s also why the solution always seems to be in the transfer market. Buy better and better. These players Liverpool and City are buying were of no greater calibre than the ones we buy when all players were at their respective previous clubs. It isn’t like they all just buy the world’s best while we shop in a different market. It’s what happens when they get to these respective clubs that is the main difference.
The guy said nothing wrong.
Get off your high horse. I hate to break it to you but your way of supporting the club isn't certificated as the role model for every other United fan.
If he can't find anything positive about Ole and staff then, yes, he has problems beyond just supporting the club. And to state unequivocally that Ole and staff can't win any major titles is pretty stupid. Do you agree with him?
For many years, we haven’t really been a team that is more than the sum of our parts. The problem is, as the bar has been raised, our rivals coached by Pep and Klopp have been exactly that. They are less about the brilliance of their individual players than they are about the quality of their unit. And their individuals are pretty good too!
We will always be on the backfoot if our grand plan is to try and bridge that 20-30% gap by simply buying individuals that are 20-30% better than the ones they have. It’s just unlikely to happen. The way it has been in recent years, it’s like we need Mbappé, Neymar, Varane etc to compete. As a collective - nothing special. Which is why; irrespective of result, more often than not in recent years, we play poorly. It’s also why the solution always seems to be in the transfer market. Buy better and better. These players Liverpool and City are buying were of no greater calibre than the ones we buy when all players were at their respective previous clubs. It isn’t like they all just buy the world’s best while we shop in a different market. It’s what happens when they get to these respective clubs that is the main difference.
Only significant difference between City, Liverpool Chelsea and us is the quality and clarity of management and coaching. World class teams need world class managers and coaches. No-one would put our lot anywhere near that level
For many years, we haven’t really been a team that is more than the sum of our parts. The problem is, as the bar has been raised, our rivals coached by Pep and Klopp have been exactly that. They are less about the brilliance of their individual players than they are about the quality of their unit. And their individuals are pretty good too!
Liverpool and City in recent years have been, I would say, 20-30% better than the simple sum of their parts. That 20-30% accounts for majority, if not all of the difference between them and us. I don’t think their players are as much better as is made out. I don’t think we can look at any of their best performers and confidently say they would have been at the same level if they were at United the last 3 years.
We will always be on the backfoot if our grand plan is to try and bridge that 20-30% gap by simply buying individuals that are 20-30% better than the ones they have. It’s just unlikely to happen. The way it has been in recent years, it’s like we need Mbappé, Neymar, Varane etc to compete. As a collective - nothing special. Which is why; irrespective of result, more often than not in recent years, we play poorly. It’s also why the solution always seems to be in the transfer market. Buy better and better. These players Liverpool and City are buying were of no greater calibre than the ones we buy when all players were at their respective previous clubs. It isn’t like they all just buy the world’s best while we shop in a different market. It’s what happens when they get to these respective clubs that is the main difference.
Agree with that but knowing the sensitivity of large chunks of that forum, I'd add this: Ole does and has done terrific job in consolidating the club and the team. Whoever would take over, has an infinitely better starting position than the one, Ole had to work with.
No he didn't say that. He said that can't trust them to win major titles against Pep and Klopp, which is his fair opinion. To respond to this by telling him to just go support another club is a ridiculously arrogant way of thinking of your ways of supporting the club and your beliefs. Just a terrible response that instead of trying to discuss why he can't trust the coaching stuff to win major titles, makes you act as the role model for United fans and the one who judges if people are supporting their club in the right way or not.