Ok, since you can't actually come up with an argument of your own how about you try deconstructing mine?
- He came in and we were shoddily zonal marking, were shocking at defending set pieces & had one of the worst records in the league when it came to conceding & scoring from set plays. 3 years on we're still statistically one of the worst teams at both attacking and defending set pieces. Nothing learnt.
- He came in & we actually did alright against the big teams with his park the bus counter attack football. After it became painfully obvious we had no plan B and everyone sussed us out our good results vs top teams dried up and we were utterly dreadful in the big games, getting the worst results against the other big teams in the league last season. Nevermind not learning, that's going backwards.
- He refused to let Romero leave to Everton for £10m, instead keeping him as 3rd choice & not even giving him a spot on the bench & then lost him on a free at the end of the year. It was a disgrace & our supporters all called it out as poor from Ole. He's now kept Donny at the club, blocking a late move to Everton, just to never use him. Repeating himself.
- Team was desperate for a proper winger for years, suffering from only having shot-taking inverted forwards. We sign a proper winger for over £70m & play him as an inverted forward.
- We never started games well under Ole & always had to go a goal behind before we started playing. 3 years later we're still waiting until we're a goal down to start playing football in most of our games.
- He was criticised for his poor handling of players when it came to them both getting injured & returning from injury. He hasn't changed. Has an abundance of depth but rotates poorly. McTominay is the latest great example, immediately thrown into a 90 minute match after returning from surgery, was piss poor & clearly miles off the pace but was then played a few days later in the very next game for 90 minutes again and to nobody's surprise he had another stinker.
- We were in dire need of a holding midfielder as soon as we immediately lost Ander on a free. Ole has spent £400m and how many holding midfielders has he brought in? Nobody. Can't see the forrest for the trees.
- 3 years & still no discernible style of play to the point where even his great protector, Gary Neville, has caved & said we have no style of play.
- Still leaves subs until far too late. Sometimes it works for him but he still watches us get dominated for 80-85 minutes before giving a player 5 or 10 minutes to make an impact.
- We were poor against the minnows of the CL group we were in last year & it got us knocked out. What have we done this season already against the minnows of our group?
- Still endlessly putting square pegs into round holes.
- We're still playing route one football with no buildup play. How often did we see Lindelof hoof it to Sancho as if he was trying to hit Peter Crouch?
Honestly bored now. There's just so many glaring issues that are as relevant now as they were at the start of his tenure. Maybe he is learning but Cristiano Junior will be 36 by the team he wins a trophy at this rate.
Just thought I'd give it a stab at answering your points.
1) we are much improved at defending set pieces, still not perfect mind, but definitely better.
2) Again we're not perfect against the top teams but we had some good results against the top teams last season too.
3) It's not Oles job to make money, why would he sell to strengthen a potential rival? That'd be stupid. Likewise with Donny, what good does it do to send him out in loan and weaken our midfield resources?
4) We don't play with out and out wingers, but having a player natural on the right as Sancho is will assist the way we want to play.
5) Ole has eluded to this, he needs to find the answer.
6) Ole has used more players that Klopp and Pep last season, despite Liverpool's injury 'crisis'. This Ole doesn't rotate story is a myth.
7) We have only been after a midfielder this season, we brought in DVDB in the hope he could do a job, alas he can't. There were no realistic options available for the money United had this window.
8) this is debatable and subjective. We don't have a set style, but we do have a mode of playing. But it's funny how people laughed at Van Gaal talking about philosophies, yet now want a philosophy/style under Ole.
9) I don't know of a game we've been dominated in for the full 85 minutes? There may be games where we have been under pressure in moments, Ole has made mistakes with his subs, but has also won games with his changes.
10) we lost against the minnows but beat the team we lost to in the final last season, I'd call that learning.
11) Like whom? Everyone seems to be playing in their rightful place, Pogba possibly playing in a slightly unorthodox position but that'll probably change once Rashford is fit.
12) Not very often, considering Lindelof has barely ayes since Varane joined. We very rarely ay a long ball, quite often preferring to play it out from the back.
Also, if you do seriously believe that we are a route one team, doesn't that signify a style of play? So which is it, we have a style or We're not a route one team?