Anyone has a screen capture of our shit formation in the game when all of our attacking players line up in the straight line and stand still ? I remember ronaldo pogba bruno sancho and greenwood standing static in a straight line when mctominay was alone in the midfield
We tried to play 4-3-3 against Villareal but it became us trying to play 2-3-5 in possession with our CAMs (Pogba and Fernandes) injecting themselves inbetween the ST (Ronaldo) and the wing-forwards (Greenwood, Sancho) and the FBs pushing up into midfield either side of McTominay. Interestingly, the night before, City played a superficially similar 2-3-5 formation at PSG. City's wingers kept playing short balls behind the defensive line for Sterling (playing ST) and the CAMs (De Bruyne and Bernardo Silva) to make sharp runs onto as did United's wingers playing short balls for Utd's CAMs and ST. In addition, like Sancho and Greenwood, the wing-forwards of City (Mahrez and Grealish) kept trying to dribble past the opposing fullbacks and make inroads towards the centre.
There was a huge difference, though. City was able to be patient and possess the ball and created many chances (they had an xG advantage away at PSG even though they lost 2-0). Utd, OTOH, couldn't hold the ball, the short-ball runs were blunt, not sharp, and the wing-forwards had no joy against the opposing FBs. Because Utd wasn't patient and kept losing the ball, the counter-attacks kept coming back at them but, luckily for Utd, because Villareal didn't have a strike-force they scored only 1 goal, way below their xG, as compared with PSG who outperformed their xG by scoring 2 with MNM. Utd were bailed out by a (lucky) set-piece goal by Telles and a scramble at the end by clutch Ronaldo (and because Villareal are not PSG) but never looked like they understood their roles in the system.
The problem with Utd (after 2 years and 10 months of Ole) is that we still don't look like we understand tactical football. We have 3 inexperienced-at-the-top-level coaches (Ole, McKenna and Carrick) who keep changing the system with little advantage. We can use individual brilliance to out-attack wide-open systems (a la Leeds) but are ineffective attacking the low-block. We look defensively dicey in systems with 5 attackers and 5 defenders like a 4-3-3 and in a 3-5-2 (or 3-5-1 against Young Boys) and can only seem secure in systems with 4 attackers and 6 defenders like the double-pivots of our usual McFred 4-2-3-1 and 4-2-2-2 (with Pogba as a LF who comes inside).
Individual brilliance (Lingard at West Ham, Ronaldo at Villareal) will get us through some games against teams with worse players (like Villareal) but we will fall at the first sign of a cohesive team with good players. Also, this reliance on individual attacking brilliance (or "expression") has tactical costs. Ronaldo just walked around when Villareal had the ball. This meant that the Villareal GK and CBs would (very funnily) just hold the ball for huge amounts of time while playing out safe in the belief that Ronaldo wasn't going to bother them. This time afforded Villareal's CMs to get free of their markers in midfield and show for a leisurely-made pass that immediately split our press.
Once split, their wingers ate up our FBs (second-choice but part of our "great" 2-eleven squad). When Varane went walkabout into midfield to try and get the ball in the second-half but missed, the ball went out against Dalot who failed to challenge Danjuma and Lindelof failed to challenge the feared Alcacer. On the other side, Telles kept showing Yeremy Pino inside and, yet, failed to make a challenge when Pino shot.
We got EXTREMELY lucky against Villareal yesterday. If DDG had even had a normal game we would have lost by 3. I used to think we needed a DM but McTominay actually played fine yesterday. Our main problem is that we don't understand and can't play tactical football. Until that is fixed we will never win the PL or CL.