AndyJ1985
New Member
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2016
- Messages
- 8,954
The last year is optional.It's 2, he's contracted until Summer 2019.
The last year is optional.It's 2, he's contracted until Summer 2019.
The last year is optional.
It isn't 1999 mate, top level sports science and nutrition has largely moved beyond that archaic model. There are far more variables at play when discussing an individual's weight than caloric intake and expenditure including but not limited to deeply ingrained set points, bacterial biodiversity, individual basal metabolic rates, specific genetic markers, insulation sensitivity and to your point, quality of caloric intake. Calorie counting works for some people but it's a very limited way of looking at things.
Those quotes from Moyes
Hope it's true he stays.
I'm not trying to dispute the laws of thermodynamics here but in the context of "you just need to burn more calories than you consume", the word "calorie" is almost always a gross oversimplification. When eaten, the fate of a "calorie" of food hinges not only on its specific molecular composition but the composition of the foods accompanying it, how said foods were prepared and how they interact with the current metabolic and nutritional state of the person consuming them.
"Burn more calories than you eat" is a good start but that advice doesn’t take all the complex intersecting factors that I mentioned into account.
So to answer your question, sure, while we all have the same basic functions, we don't respond to all stimuli in the same way.
In my strictly anecdotal experience, advising people to eat more of the right kinds of foods and exercising less but at a higher intensity has always been more fruitful than saying "you need to work at a caloric deficit" because the latter ignores obvious things like how painfully imprecise most food labels tend to be.
"I said last July that Wayne has an outstanding chance to be a true legend of this club's long and rich history. He is just 42 goals away from overtaking Sir Bobby as our record goalscorer and becoming the first United player to hit 250 goals for the club.
So does he have 2 years left on his contract or a 1+1 with the club deciding? Looks like 2 years from that club statement back when he signed.
In what way will his experience be valuable?
I don't understand this argument. In what way did it help us last season?
Carrick's won everything that Wayne has. And provides far more to the team at less wages.Don't underestimate that experience and the value it brings to the younger and more inexperienced members of our team.
Carrick's won everything that Wayne has. And provides far more to the team at less wages.
- I know it's Pilip, may not be trustworthy, but that Rooney bit if true really stinks up his legacy with us. Wonder who are the 6 players who can leave: Rooney, Januzaj, Young, Smalling/Jones?
So does he have 2 years left on his contract or a 1+1 with the club deciding? Looks like 2 years from that club statement back when he signed.
He doesn't fancy China and unfortunately (or not?) he has the right to make that choice.His future is in China. Only Chinese clubs are stupid enough to pay him huge wages for subpar performances. The other option is to stink the place at United and ruin much of his legacy by being paid tens of millions for doing nothing.
I would love to see Koeman's face when told he is running a retirement home.He'll end up going to Everton in some deal that sees us paying the difference in his wages for the season.
Even in a worst case scenario, I can't see this club sending its highest ever goals scorer to the reserves.I'm 99.9% certain it is 1+1.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...-Rooney-wants-Manchester-United-contract.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...t-of-new-mls-franchise-los-angeles-fc-amid-n/
I think we reported it as being until 2019 as both Woodward and Moyes saw nailing him down until he was 32 as a bit of a coup and a statement of intent. In reality, we structure all our contracts with the final year as an mutual option and have done since around 2010.
If he's trying to get us to buy him out of his contract he can feck off and rot in the reserves and Mourinho should make it absolutely clear what Rooney is doing by removing the captaincy from him and giving it to someone in the First XI.
I'm 99.9% certain it is 1+1.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...-Rooney-wants-Manchester-United-contract.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/football...t-of-new-mls-franchise-los-angeles-fc-amid-n/
I think we reported it as being until 2019 as both Woodward and Moyes saw nailing him down until he was 32 as a bit of a coup and a statement of intent. In reality, we structure all our contracts with the final year as an mutual option and have done since around 2010.
If he's trying to get us to buy him out of his contract he can feck off and rot in the reserves and Mourinho should make it absolutely clear what Rooney is doing by removing the captaincy from him and giving it to someone in the First XI.
So what would you do if you were in charge, if it was true?Even in a worst case scenario, I can't see this club sending its highest ever goals scorer to the reserves.
It is a two way street, he wants to play, we won't be giving him many minutes, if what pilib says is true he wants us to pay him so that he can go play somewhere else, i would tell him and shitty agent to go do one, if this is true i hope he gets the schweinsteiger treatment good luck with your next world cup dream then rooney.Wanted to bring this here.
I have to disagree.
His two year contract plus bonuses are worth at least £25m. You have to be crazy to turn your face at that. Especially when that's what we owe him.
We put ourselves in this situation and it should rightly cost us.
He has every right to demand his money.