- Joined
- Feb 2, 2016
- Messages
- 260
Can someone tell me how he played in full detail. What did he di good, what wrong?(Didnt watch the game)
I myself would be inclined to start Mata over Rooney but he wasn't as bad as people on here are talking about. Like someone else mentioned, it has become a very annoying aspect of this forum. He was pretty average but "incredibly poor" is such a silly exaggeration.
This.The thing about Rooney though is that what people are classing as an average performance from him is poor. If a player creates feck all in the way of service, instead opting for safe, cop-out wide passes on a regular basis, and consistently loses the ball while being incredibly slow to react to everything, then that is poor.
No thats nonsense.
Players always have something to prove. Doesn't matter how much they've done or how much good will they've built up over the years everytime you step on the pitch you have something to prove.
Thats not even a football thing, but sport in general. Do you see Michael Phelps turn up at the Olympics and go 'I've got nothing to prove I won eight golds in Beijing'? Do you feck.
If Rooney genuinely feels like he has nothing to prove then I would suspect its a complacency that explains his utterly appalling form for the past two years.
Nothing to prove indeed.
He consistently lost the ball which led to the breaking down of attacking moves. He just generally looks unfit and his incredibly slow and lethargic play was hampering us on a regular basis. Not to mention the fact that despite presumably being deployed in a sort of attacking mid/in behind the striker type role, he provided feck all in the way of service for Ibrahimovic who was forced to work for his own goal.
He occasionally looked alright when granted time and space, but even then he tended to knock it out to a wide option instead of looking for the man in the best position. Not the worst performance he's produced, but I'd comfortably say it was a poor one. I think we've just become so used to Rooney being a bit shit these days that performances like today's have kind of become his average. Which isn't good enough.
All someone has to do is make a Rooney touch compilation and the video will prove it. Martial was quiet for large parts, but he actually looked dangerous once he started going after their players. Martial was also was a defensive liability towards the end which rightfully got him subbed.
The stats won't tell the full story. There was a counterattack that Rooney messed up that did not count as a bad pass or dispossession, but he did mess it up. Or my memory is wrong and he did mess up the pass or possession directly.He had four unsuccessful touches, the same as Mata. He had a 90% pass completion rate for the whole game with 7/9 successful long passes.
Four unsuccessful touches was too high but to say that he gave the ball away consistently is an exaggeration if you ask me. For comparison Zlatan had two unsuccessful touches and a pass completion of 76%.
I think there was one occasion when he didn't play Zlatan in but he did get Valencia into good crossing positions a few times.
It's ridiculous.You're wasting your time bud, he scored therefore his fanboys will see a motm performance.
The stats won't tell the full story. There was a counterattack that Rooney messed up that did not count as a bad pass or dispossession, but he did mess it up.
Lmao. We've got the the point Rooneyistas are saying he wasn't abhorrently shite, and therefore we should be frothing at averagely mediocre.
His performance was average, he got a goal and we won well. His post match interview was fine and Rooney's drive and work ethic is probably the least questionable aspect of his game, which is plain to anyone with an ounce of objectivity.
Sorely lacking in this thread and forum, unfortunately.
@Sparky Rhiwabon
One does not concur.Nothing like hyperbole.
Also good English skills, averagely mediocre? I thought he was stunningly fantastic but would settle for brilliantly good.
That's the part that's been questioned the most. SAF even noted his notoriously poor conditioning in his fecking book.
Why's it bias? We all just watched the same game and the vast majority were if the opinion that he was shit. Where does bias come into it?He was just okay, for me as good as Mata and better than Martial. He scored a good goal and for the most part kept it well (see stats rather than relying on your own bias).
Not risky enough and didnt drive it forward or look to furnish Ibra with enough chances, would be my main issue and I'd like to see Mata or Mkhiki there with more pace on the right to help Ibra.
But he and the team played well, great win on the opening day and 3 goals for players who all needed them.
Anyone rushing in here to have a whinge need's their head examined, it's a bit sad. As for the comments after that's a complete non story and only gets brought up by the kind of folk who lead the post count in this thread.
Have a good day!
It's encouraging that he's being substituted at least. van Gaal would give him 90 minutes no matter what.
2 games, 2 times substituted. I think he'll eventually be dropped at some point this season.
When did that ever happen ?I honestly fee that i'd score as much (or more) than Rooney if i played as often, I might be a little fatter but much better looking and not kicked a football in years but I'm certain if I spent enough time in the box,some scraps will eventually fall my way. It's not like I have anything to prove to anyone
Looks like Mou, like LVG before him will only drop Rooney when the results start getting bad. He'll play as long as we're grinding out good wins
Anyone rushing in here to have a whinge need's their head examined, it's a bit sad. As for the comments after that's a complete non story and only gets brought up by the kind of folk who lead the post count in this thread.
Have a good day!
Its only bias when you're negative you see.
Bald stats without context apparently answer everything too. As a researcher I wish that was fecking true.
Learning new things all the time in this thread.
I said that they don't tell the whole story but do you agree that pass completion stats and unsuccessful touches can tell us if he gave the ball away constantly or not?
I disagree to be honest. Its a sign of things to come and he is doing it first game of seasonDon't think two subs at 88 and 89 mins foretell anything to be honest.
I am not Rooney hater nor defender,just find amazing his first touch,i mean brick wall have better first touch,whats ever worse those balls arent smashed into him either,just dont understan how is that possible.
He was just okay, for me as good as Mata and better than Martial. He scored a good goal and for the most part kept it well (see stats rather than relying on your own bias).
Not risky enough and didnt drive it forward or look to furnish Ibra with enough chances, would be my main issue and I'd like to see Mata or Mkhiki there with more pace on the right to help Ibra.
But he and the team played well, great win on the opening day and 3 goals for players who all needed them.
Anyone rushing in here to have a whinge need's their head examined, it's a bit sad. As for the comments after that's a complete non story and only gets brought up by the kind of folk who lead the post count in this thread.
Have a good day!
last week in the CS stats told us he had 0 disposessionI said that they don't tell the whole story but do you agree that pass completion stats and unsuccessful touches can tell us if he gave the ball away constantly or not?