Nick 0208 Ldn
News 24
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2004
- Messages
- 23,721
You are right mate, I cant stand him and would happily sell him for some training kits and a bag of balls, but I also try to be objective and will give credit when it's duePretty much this. And aren't you one of his most vocal critics? He wasn't awful. He had an okay game, should have done better on the one chance, great assist, but the way people are talking it's like he's had one of his awful games, which just wasn't the case.
Well that's fecking nonsense, isn't it? He's clearly a very good player. Not a world class player and probably one on the decline, but still one of the best in the PL and better than the vast majority of alternatives for the national side.I hate making incredibly simplistic comments but he really just isn't very good any more. He doesn't link up well with anyone and while clearly he's got talent and he's not a useless footballer, it's becoming harder and harder to justify picking someone who just never turns up in the World Cup and actively seems to hinder the team.
Not a fan of his at all but the criticism seems to be overboard right now. Good in the first half, great cross for the goal, made things work for you lot and then faded just like anybody else bar Sterling ( who probably was a MOTM from the English side ) and he's getting some serious stick here.
Not to mention that he was thrown around from #10, to left wing and then at last to #9.
The undroppable argument, fair enough, same happened here this season but he was far from being abysmal as some try to picture it.
He missed a chance that any player on the money he gets would score with his eyes closed and a player of his supposed level should influence the game much more, instead an 18 year old Sterling after his first full season managed to do that much better than him. We have a better number 9 in RVP, a better number 10 in Mata and he's not that good out wide since he's lost a bit of pace from his younger days. He may really lose his place with us if he brings this form into the club season.You really have to doubt understanding of people if they call this performance 'poor.' Not great by any stretch of imagination obviously but he was not helped by the position he was playing. In first half, apart from cross he didn't see much of the ball but that's because Welbz, Sturridge and Sterling were playing between themselves mostly and attacks were coming from other side than Rooney's. Not to mention he was helping in tracking back. 2nd half, more than Rooney, the change in formation and heat affected team mostly. Welbeck should have been left longer on pitch because to his energy and behind Rooney to create chances.
Besides the assist he did nothing in the first half. And he didn't track back, leaving Baines completely exposed. How is that 'good'?
Besides the assist he did nothing in the first half. And he didn't track back, leaving Baines completely exposed. How is that 'good'?
He didn't slip.How good was Gerrard in his role? What the feck did he do? Is he going to dropped?
Well that's fecking nonsense, isn't it? He's clearly a very good player. Not a world class player and probably one on the decline, but still one of the best in the PL and better than the vast majority of alternatives for the national side.
How good was Gerrard in his role? What the feck did he do? Is he going to dropped?
He didn't slip.
Success. Mission accomplished.
He missed a chance that any player on the money he gets would score with his eyes closed and a player of his supposed level should influence the game much more, instead an 18 year old Sterling after his first full season managed to do that much better than him. We have a better number 9 in RVP, a better number 10 in Mata and he's not that good out wide since he's lost a bit of pace from his younger days. He may really lose his place with us if he brings this form into the club season.
Well that's fecking nonsense, isn't it? He's clearly a very good player. Not a world class player and probably one on the decline, but still one of the best in the PL and better than the vast majority of alternatives for the national side.
Nonsense, of course he did track back, if there were times when he didn't, let's not forget that he's a striker/#10 thrown on a fecking wing in order to accomodate a winger in #10.
Quite simply, your whole front four had a good game in the first half, you collapsed in the second.
Woy got outplayed like feck tonight.
Besides the assist he did nothing in the first half. And he didn't track back, leaving Baines completely exposed. How is that 'good'?
He did much better job on the left, than anyone else actually. Candreva while making a lot of runs failed to create even single chance in first half, then when Rooney switched to the right side, the goal came exactly from a England's left.Besides the assist he did nothing in the first half. And he didn't track back, leaving Baines completely exposed. How is that 'good'?
He was picked on the wing so he must be judged in that position.
If he isn't good enough as a winger, which he isn't, then you shouldn't play him. Roy doesn't have the balls to drop him though.
fecking hell. Well he was changed for the second half and guess what, they scored after 4 minutes who's to blame for Italy's second goal?
It's terrible management all round, why play him on the left wing and expect him to drop into left back in the first place? either have the balls to drop him or change the style of play. Rooney was shit today, I'm not denying that but a large part of that was due to the role he was given, absolutely shocking to play him there and expect him to do that job.
I would drop Gerrard too. Start Wilshire instead.
That's like putting Sturridge in the central midfield and complaining that he doesn't perform.
I just don't understand why Woy switched Rooney with Sterling, one was playing as a #10 at his club for whole season, the other one played as a winger for his club last season. Why would you swap that.
Welbecks fault for the second.
I agree that Rooney shouldn't be playing on the wing. He shouldn't be playing period. I'd start Barkley instead.
Not going to happen and won't be too wise. In my opinion, England should have gone for more control of midfield earlier in the game. 4-3-3 with Barkley in for Sterling. Rooney, Sturridge and Welbz to alternate as front 3. Past hour mark, when everyone was going to tire, unleash Sterling. Opposite happened in game and Sterling, in spite of having a very good game, was made ineffective later by tiring out, having cramps and playing in a role which is not his best.
Sir Alex always spotted a player getting last it and acted quickly to replace him, looks like he was right about Rooney.
Baines getting outplayed like a child and then Cahill not realising at all where Balotelli is is Danny's fault now?
Christ.
I also thought England should play 433 against Italy. If Roy didn't need to fit Rooney into the team they may well have done it.
Could have been done with Rooney too. He did try 4-3-3 without Sterling earlier and it wasn't too bad. In fact if it is 4-3-3, let Rooney be in middle and Welbz and Sturridge wide. Their pace can be used for counter and in his central role he can use both of them or himself to finish moves.