paceme
Golly Gilmore
"He has been Manchester United this season, without him we'd probably have been relegated."
Dying of laughter at that right there. It must be my lack of sense of humour.
fecking hell, I'm done.
"He has been Manchester United this season, without him we'd probably have been relegated."
Dying of laughter at that right there. It must be my lack of sense of humour.
It's like being hit by tsunami after tsunami of stupid, isn't it?fecking hell, I'm done.
If I meant best player we've ever had then I'd have bloody said it. You've misinterpreted that on your own, DO NOT blame me for that.
What the hell does that second sentence even mean? Again you've plucked that straight out of thin air. Half the squad doing the work of 2-3 others? No chance, they do their roles very well and fill in elsewhere part of the time and are great in their own right. I haven't seen anyone out of the current squad bar Rooney effectively play in three positions at the same time. He's up front but drops back to midfield and even further to defence consistently. Argue with that if you want, but you're talking bollocks if you do.
The third, well you've clearly got a bias against him to say something like that. I don't like Wayne Rooney the person, but Wayne Rooney the player has been exceptional for us, as I said yesterday; Just because I hate his personality doesn't mean he suddenly becomes lazy or bad at football.
The fact of the matter is that there are as many people who currently hate him as there are people who realise he's going to end up being one of Manchester United's legends at this rate. You've got to get over it mate, you sound like a jilted ex.
Can you quote the post that was in response to please? I'm on my phone now or I'd go back and get it myself.You used as a basis to differentiate between the quality of their respective seasons, a daft aspect to use as a measure which you later recognised.
That's still not proving me wrong though.
Can you quote the post that was in response to please? I'm on my phone now or I'd go back and get it myself.
Fair enough, I didn't expect it to be like that so I was completely wrong in that aspect, but Rooney's game is more than just distance covered in my opinion. In my defence that probably won't be the case for all competitions, seems like just the CL.OK, I already did it myself, but waited for you to say that you'd call yourself an idiot if I proved you wrong, but I can live with just "fair enough, I was wrong" too. According to uefa's official website and statistics this is our players mile per minute ratio this season in champions league:
Valencia: 120,4 m
Chicharito: 120,49
Giggs: 122,66
Welbeck: 123,7
Rooney: 125,03
Carrick: 128,39
van Persie: 129,8
Nani: 130,33
Fellaini: 131,66
Januzaj: 131,85
Kagawa: 133,15
Young: 136, 36
Cleverley: 137,34
If you don't believe me, you can check it yourself:
http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/statistics/round=2000479/players/index.html
I used to check this in last few seasons too, and he never really stood out(like Carrick for example stood out in this part) but people were always convinced that he runs for three players for some reason. He can run, that's for sure, he is never lazy and he always covers lot of pitch, but everyone runs in todays game but for some reason some of our fans think it's just Rooney who runs in our team.
OK, I already did it myself, but waited for you to say that you'd call yourself an idiot if I proved you wrong, but I can live with just "fair enough, I was wrong" too. According to uefa's official website and statistics this is our players mile per minute ratio this season in champions league:
Valencia: 120,4 m
Chicharito: 120,49
Giggs: 122,66
Welbeck: 123,7
Rooney: 125,03
Carrick: 128,39
van Persie: 129,8
Nani: 130,33
Fellaini: 131,66
Januzaj: 131,85
Kagawa: 133,15
Young: 136, 36
Cleverley: 137,34
If you don't believe me, you can check it yourself:
http://www.uefa.com/uefachampionsleague/season=2014/statistics/round=2000479/players/index.html
I used to check this in last few seasons too, and he never really stood out(like Carrick for example stood out in this part) but people were always convinced that he runs for three players for some reason. He can run, that's for sure, he is never lazy and he always covers lot of pitch, but everyone runs in todays game but for some reason some of our fans think it's just Rooney who runs in our team.
Fair enough, I didn't expect it to be like that so I was completely wrong in that aspect, but Rooney's game is more than just distance covered in my opinion. In my defence that probably won't be the case for all competitions, seems like just the CL.
I admire that you've backed up your point with a fact. Lots of kudos for that.
He's very influential on the pitch and most of the play goes through him, he breaks up a lot of attacks from the opposition and does a staggering amount of defensive work for a forward.
Can you quote the post that was in response to please? I'm on my phone now or I'd go back and get it myself.
Rooney has been our stand out player though, by far.
Yes Rooney did start the season well, particularly considering the context of his situation at that time. However there were then [De Gea has been at a high level for 16 months or more], and continue to be other players who are doing their jobs just the same. Even somebody like Welbeck stepped up during that 8 match run in which both RVP and Rooney were injured.
Ah, well in that respect you've a good point.No problems, I just wanted to prove that Rooney isn't really running marathon in every game, and that our whole team runs more than enough.
I wouldn't waste your time on Nick. In the summer he was arguing how Andy Carroll and Danny Welbeck were making a better claim for an England starting berth than Rooney
I can kinda see where you're coming from there. It could be interpreted as a dig at the other players, that genuinely wasn't my intention though, I swear.No problem.
Now this followed from your belief that Rooney was the only one "busting a gut" and whose quality separated us from a relegation dogfight.
It seemed that in your desire to defend Rooney from criticism [undeserved in your view] you were then in turn doing others a disservice, or at least such was my interpretation.
I believe i said that form should be respected, and that Rooney's tournament pedigree is not one which supports a status of guaranteed starter.
No, you said both of them had made a better case than Rooney despite Rooney scoring more than both of them combined in what was his worst season at the club.
So either way we need better midfielders and full backs.
Does it make sense to give a 28 year old football player a 5 year deal - as rumoured - worth 300K a week? He'll be a 32 year old on 300K a week. Mad.
A universal truth that we all can agree on.It really is pointless speculating what he is paid. Let's all just agree anyone on more than ten grand a week is a lucky rich bar steward
Agreed, the length of the contract concerns me, I've always had nagging concerns about how well he is going to age based on how long he has been playing, injuries sustained, the type of physical makeup he possesses and the way he has not always looked after himself as well as he should, I hope I'm wrong but I don't think I amI think it's fair enough to argue the toss about whether we should offer him a long term contract making him the highest player at the club. I think we should but am open to opinions from those who think we shouldn't.
Where it all gets nuts is when you get people saying exactly what sort of contract should be offered and how it should be structured. They've been negotiating the damn thing for months. The club will obviously push for what's best for them and Rooney will push for what's best for him. Whatever deal is agreed is the deal required to keep him at the club.
Yep, which is probably over 90% of the players in the league.It really is pointless speculating what he is paid. Let's all just agree anyone on more than ten grand a week is a lucky rich bar steward
Depressing ain't itYep, which is probably over 90% of the players in the league.
Fair commentAs fare as the cluib is concerned, there's downsides and upsides to a short term deal. The big downside being we have to go through all this shite again in another year or two. That's neither here nor there though. They'll offer him whatever length of contract strikes the best balance between what they're willing to offer and he's willing to sign.
True, if you're looking for an example of playing for a contract. Emmanuel Adebayor.His last lengthy dip in form came when he was last negotiating a new contract and he immediately improved after signing up. You can accuse him of a lot of things but "only playing for a new contract" is not one of them.
I never asserted that you said he was the best player we've ever had. You said he'd by far our best player which is why we are so desperate to keep him. I said that was bollocks and that we have at least 3 other player's that are just as good as him. You then clarified that you meant he was by far our best player this season, which would a) doesn't really make sense in the context as we wouldn't be desperate to keep someone who has merely been our best player for 6 months, and b) isn't actually true (given that Januzaj and De Gea have both also been impressive). I also don't think anyone has been particularly impressive, hence us being in 7th place.
You then said that Rooney effectively plays in 3 positions at the same time, whilst dismissing that other player's (Ozil, Ramsey, Toure, Aguero etc) do the same. So we effectively play with 13 player's, as Rooney plays 3 positions at the same time. Jesus Christ the other 10 player's must be useless if we're 7th whilst having this kind of advantage. Also it's quite worrying that our central midfield and defense is so shit considering that we essentially are playing a 5-3-3 formation.
Your fanboyism of Rooney is bizarre. No one has said Rooney is lazy or bad at Football, you are just creating a straw man argument to make your nonsensical rants seems justified. People are however suggesting that he's no better than 5-10 other player's in the Premier League. Player's that are far more professional and earn somewhere between 1/3 and 2/3 of what Rooney is after.
All Wayne Rooney is is a very good Footballer. He isn't World Class because of his lack of consistency, he isn't three player's in one and he doesn't work harder than most other quality player's in his position. Is he exceptional? That's up for debate, I personally think he has been exceptional for 4-5 seasons, unfortunately all but one were between 2004-2010, which is slowly becoming a memory.
I don't need to get over anything. I think he's worth a similar wage as other very good player's (c. £150k) and think the club would be stupid to offer him double what his ability warrants. I won't lose sleep if we offer him £300k a week, but will merely be disappointed that an obvious mercenary can leverage a "best player in the World" salary, whilst not even performing as one of the top 5-10 player's in the League for over 18 months.
jamie jackson @JamieJackson___What does that say? Embedded tweets don't work on Tapatalk and twitter's blocked at work.
Indeed.
Rooney isnt the type to be too lazy on a fat contract. He wants to win, he wants trophies. The problem over the last few years appears to simply be his relationship with SAF. Now, im not saying saf was wrong, just that roo was unhappy, he needs an arm around his shoulder and to feel loved, which saf didnt do!