Studiousness off the ball - positional discipline, awareness of role when play breaks down, but I'm sure you're aware of what I meant. The trade off you speak of leaves us in a lesser position than we started with - they are not equivalent players and it most certainly isn't a like-for-like with a different brush.Why do you want power, aggression and "studiousness off the ball" whatever that means. He'd a different player, he'd being other things to the table. He wouldn't run around as much and wouldn't score as much but would create more, help us hold on to the ball under pressure and run the game better. It's a trade off.
We anyway need our CMs to be better than they are. Rooney doesn't do their job so as to increase our need for a central midfielder. It exists anyway and we will eventually get another midfielder regardless of Rooney or Ozil. So it's pointless. It will happen.
The goals argument also doesn't stand as he's more creative. So he'll make up for lesser goals by making sure the team creates more.
It answers your question very well. I was talking about what "should" be the case not what the management of united think or will do. I believe Wayne Rooney today is a less important player to this team than he once was and has was not very good in the season gone by. So as per me his stock has gone down. And more importantly, taking into consideration of the facts above, I don't believe he's worthy of a pay rise.
Compared to Ozil, Rooney is Roy Keane in his contribution to the midfield cause.
Fan opinion on what Wayne's stock is is clearly irrelevant, you put forth that this was not so.