Brophs
The One and Only
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2006
- Messages
- 52,160
Has he posted pics of the Chelsea fans?
I reckon if he came on against Hull at home, with us being 4-0 up, he'd have got some boos.
Rooney on Facebook :
I don't quite get it about having to have this mutual love between players and fans. Players at the end of the day are employees of the club who pay them good money to perform, and fans are just fans, and these players come and go. 90% of the players we have over the years aren't even United fans themselves
No one said it's the same thing.Much as I'm pissed off with his behaviour, saying it's the same as Suarez is ridiculous. Suarez openly went to war with his club, where as Rooney has stayed quiet.
No it wasnt it was weird as feck. Never been at a game in my life before were the opposition fans are chanting the name of one of your players. Classy bunch the Chavs are.That was brilliant
Yeah classy club with some classy fans.No it wasnt it was weird as feck. Never been at a game in my life before were the opposition fans are chanting the name of one of your players. Classy bunch the Chavs are.
The 1 time a sugar daddy club can benefit us, they're nowhere to be found. PSG and Monaco, I'm looking at you !
The 1 time a sugar daddy club can benefit us, they're nowhere to be found. PSG and Monaco, I'm looking at you !
realistic ones, Sir. Realistic ones!Er... Chelsea?
They signed similar/better strikers not prone to going missing for a season.
They signed similar/better strikers not prone to going missing for a season.
Neither are proven to be better nor to not go missing. It's very easy to hey carried away with relatively new talents, but contrary to a lot of the bollocks talked Rooney has done it consistently at the very top level for over a decade.
So with just 5 good seasons, he's got 197 goals for us? Not a bad record that!Rooney alternates between good and mediocre/bad seasons. This season is his good year.
No one said it's the same thing.
I think they're both identical situations. Both players wanted to leave so received verbal abuse from the supporters, both clubs have refused to sell their players, both players will have to play another season at their clubs and both sets of supporters will sing Suarez or Rooney name.
Eh, what is "simple" about that? Fergie came out and said it was the case and I have no reason to believe that he was lying. That was then pretty much confirmed by Rooney's silence all summer long refusing to put the speculation to rest. What about this whole thing is confusing you? I don't need the WHOLE truth. What I know is enough for me to know that I, personally, wouldn't laud and applaud the player involved in said events.
If there's one thing I'm 'glad' about though, it's that the fans didn't give him the excuse he was seeking to force through a move because the fans are against him. Even Jose seemed surprised, and I'm glad we didn't play into their hands.
Here's the likely key:
v Swansea - substitute - sulks.
v Chelsea - starts - happy.
So I guess Wayne will have to start every big match...
Here's the likely key:
v Swansea - substitute - sulks.
v Chelsea - starts - happy.
So I guess Wayne will have to start every big match...
I said it earlier in the thread...had we signed a big name this summer (a fabregas, Ronaldo or bale), he wouldn't have got that reaction if he played under the same circumstances.Rooney has finally figured out he won't be allowed to leave now, and the only way forward for him is to seek reconciliation with the fans, and the club. I won't be surprised to hear him say it was the love of the fans what has kept him at the club. The reception he got from both sets of fans on Monday was weird, and to me from a United perspective seemed an over reaction to a player who hardly wanted to stay. Desperate and needy from both sets of fans.
Note: there's been plenty of 'daft' posts from the other side of the debate too, stuff along the lines of "I haven't read any of the press coverage...but it's all lies" & "Wayne might not have time to make a statement, and it would be misinterpeted if he did". I mean, come on...The whole debate has been skewed by some posters effectively arguing that "Your theory is nuts & you're horribly biased...because you don't agree with my sound reasoning."
Anyway, as Fortitude suggested, the club knows better than any of us (regarding this matter).
A significant number of those chanting for Rooney seemed to do so spontaneously, i don't think they consciously thought about what they were doing either as a means to send the player a message or Chelsea. A smaller percentage of Rooney proponents to be sure however for the remainder they probably fell into some mob mentality.
If they'd chanted for the team as a whole fair enough, or at least have waited for Rooney to show the quality of his performance first.
There will also come a time one trusts when one of the other forwards keeps him out of the team for a spell, that will be interesting too.
So because the crowd didn't behave how you thought they should have it has to be a mob mentality? Either a real high opinion of yourself or a low one of everyone else.
So because the crowd didn't behave how you thought they should have it has to be a mob mentality? Either a real high opinion of yourself or a low one of everyone else.
I would imagine that the chant grew like most each week and every week, also perhaps an element of instinct involved. I can well understand their urge to reflect the start we had made to the game, however the reaction to Rooney was disproportionately enthusiastic particularly at the beginning IMO.His appearance couldn't simply be removed from the context of these past months, or at least i think it should have a degree of influence.
In all honesty, the only time Rooney shouldn't be starting is if he is injured or being rested. Otherwise he should be one of the first names on the team sheet because that's just how good he is. Last season he had a disappointing season but still had something like 30 goals and assists. Even his biggest haters can't deny that he's easily one of our best players, along with van persie.This is the crux of it.
Good point, it'll be interesting (infuriating) witnessing the media scrutiny and agonising when Rooney is on the bench for tactical, not fitness reasons.
Why not just treat him like any other player? I'm not advocating booing. We did the opposite of singling him out for booing.If we are to keep the knobhead showing him some support when he plays is the right thing to do, if that's what it takes to get the best out of him. He knows he has pissed people off, there is nothing to be gained from distracting him from the game which I'm sure booing his every touch would do.
Why not just treat him like any other player? I'm not advocating booing. We did the opposite of singling him out for booing.
He got a very special treatment the other day, mate. I'd suggest he doesn't even deserve to be treated like the rest of the team. They haven't come off throwing hissy fits last season. My personal take would be to just be indifferent towards him, accept he's here and in time if he shows commitment to the club then cheer him on (although I wouldn't).Treating him like any other player involved chanting his name, to be fair. Most players have some chant or other. Specifically changing our songbook just to omit him is treating him differently to any other player.