So in conclusion Young's missus is a bit fatter than the rest of the players' partners.
I thought he had taken his mum....surely she can't be his missus!
So in conclusion Young's missus is a bit fatter than the rest of the players' partners.
Why do you even give a shit how he looks when going out with his wife?Well, does he? Oh look, Im going out for a meal with my mates and my mrs.........what a fecking chore.
Why do you even give a shit how he looks when going out with his wife?
You really have become a caricature of yourself, Sparky_Hughes.
I don't care, I just don't understand how someone with such a charmed life can wander around looking like he has the weight of the world on his shoulders, if I was him you wouldn't be able to wipe the grin off my face.
So in conclusion Young's missus is a bit fatter than the rest of the players' partners.
Actual sex with a real woman?!
I think I'm going to have to go and have a lie down.
Yes, Schmeichel is lying. Just like all the official statements all summer about Rooney not being for sale and training well and looking committed have been lies, but all the media stories have been the truth, leaked by evil Dr Stretford.Yeah yeah
His dream move to madrid/barca hasn't materialised and he's realised we aren't selling him to chelsea so it's damage limitation time.
With all due respect that is a load of bollocks. Just because you are rich it doesnt make you in any way immune from stress or sadness. Even having a job you love, perhaps the best job in the world, wont protect you from that. In fact if anything, having everything can be a massive pressure in itself. Setting aside the lack of privacy and the constant pressure, when your life looks so blessed but you still arent happy, what then? Look at how many footballers struggle with drink and gambling problems and the rest of it. Not saying they deserve any particular sympathy, we all have our problems, theirs are no more or less burdensome than ours, but to castigate him for the expression on his face while being snapped by paparazzi is grossly unfair.
Sometimes you look in a field and you see a cow and you think it’s a better cow than the one you’ve got in the field. It’s a fact, right, and it never really works out that way. It’s probably the same cow and it’s not as good as your own cow
With all due respect that is a load of bollocks. Just because you are rich it doesnt make you in any way immune from stress or sadness. Even having a job you love, perhaps the best job in the world, wont protect you from that. In fact if anything, having everything can be a massive pressure in itself. Setting aside the lack of privacy and the constant pressure, when your life looks so blessed but you still arent happy, what then? Look at how many footballers struggle with drink and gambling problems and the rest of it. Not saying they deserve any particular sympathy, we all have our problems, theirs are no more or less burdensome than ours, but to castigate him for the expression on his face while being snapped by paparazzi is grossly unfair.
Shaggy's obviously doing his best to keep the tin hat parade alive:
Yes, Schmeichel is lying. Just like all the official statements all summer about Rooney not being for sale and training well and looking committed have been lies, but all the media stories have been the truth, leaked by evil Dr Stretford.
Please don't tell me you actually think you've "won" the debate just because Wayne's not being allowed to leave?
Please don't tell me you actually think you've "won" the debate just because Wayne's not being allowed to leave? Did you learn nothing from his 2010 damage-limiting statements, and the damage limitation tactics being hastily drawn up right now? Wayne wants - or wanted - special treatment; he's not going to get it, it seems, so we're being led down the "I never wanted to leave" road again. That's all.
Schmeichel says he never asked to leave and will stay, this is after he spoke with Rooney.
http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1...redicts-manchester-united-stay-rooney?cc=5739
He wanted special treatment, he's a bit of a brat, he's a bit precious, he's probably a bit greedy and/or easily misled by his greedy agent - this is true. It's a fair bit different to the picture you've tried to paint of him throughout this thread though. None of this makes him a colossal cnut and it would indeed suggest that in playing terms he's valued by the club a hell of a lot more than he's valued by you. Otherwise we happily would've shipped the greedy waste of space for a cut-price deal weeks ago.
Wonder where they went for tea... I'm guessing Australasia from those photos?
I stopped reading at ''goal understands...''
"Manchester United are one of the biggest clubs in the world. Why on earth would we sell one of the best players in the world?"
"There's no Alex Ferguson anymore so we have to prove we are still competitive and we can still win championships"
"That first game I knew was going to set the tone and we went there and won 4-1 in emphatic style"
Love it when legends like Pete do that. Especially when, like Pete, they've had a spell at City, and so their loyalties could be seen as ambiguous without such comments.
For those still hanging on this all-important question, I think we can definitely say it was Australasia...
"they enjoyed sushi, black cod, beef skewers and honey-glazed duck."
Makes me hungry just thinking about that place.![]()
Ah thanks A1ex, I was actually wondering. I even checked out the menu, bloody hell it's expensive to eat out at a nice restaurant in the UK!
Maybe that's what was on Wayne's mind when arriving, which could explain his look of anger and confusion: why are they dragging me to this expensive place when I have limited resources? Am I going to have to pay for Ashley's missus? Who's going to pick up the bill?
I'm actually going to post this again (credit Livewire) because it supports the interpretation of events that has seemed the most obvious one to me throughout this whole "saga".
http://espnfc.com/news/story/_/id/1...redicts-manchester-united-stay-rooney?cc=5739
The former goalkeeper, who captained United to victory in the 1999 Champions League final, told The Sun he has heard directly from Rooney that the forward did not formally ask to leave.
“I know Sir Alex Ferguson came out and said Wayne asked for a transfer, but I have spoken to Wayne and he said he never did," he said.
“He hasn’t said he wants to go to Chelsea, Arsenal or anywhere else. I hope United play Wayne against Chelsea on Monday. That will put everything to bed.
“but he will do anything asked of him.”
Every one of your objections is based on things you've read in the press, unsupported by quotes or sources. Essentially your argument is that journalists working for the Sun, Mail etc are more reliable sources of information on United than Schmeichel's conversation with Rooney.
Which has always been the basis for the hysteria on here. Ignoring Moyes repeatedly saying Rooney is working hard in training and is not for sale, but believing claims by third-rate sports journos that 'inside sources in Rooney's camp' have told them that he's 'upset' or 'dreams of PSG' or whatever other nonsense. And supporting that approach with the usual 'smokescreen', 'you're naive if you think Paul Stretford doesn't run the English media' stuff.
Wrong.
Unless you are saying that Sir Alex did claim that Wayne Rooney submitted a formal transfer request?
Or that the reason Moyes couldn't state for the world to hear that the player wanted to remain at the football club was due to some plot device?
Why is your presumption of deceit residing at Fergie's door with so much certainty?
Where is the evidence to support Rooney having been a wholly committed member of the squad since May, why does he refuse to speak [putting Jose in his place can hardly be seen as a negative]?
Spot on mate. Just be careful though. Its amazing how quickly you get in trouble on here for challenging other posters' certainty. The only we 'evidence' we have about Rooney's commitment is Moye's words in interviews. Rooney's own silence also speaks volumes.
Unless you are saying that Sir Alex did claim that Wayne Rooney submitted a formal transfer request?
Or that the reason Moyes couldn't state for the world to hear that the player wanted to remain at the football club was due to some plot device?
Why is your presumption of deceit residing at Fergie's door with so much certainty?
Where is the evidence to support Rooney having been a wholly committed member of the squad since May?
Why does he refuse to speak [putting Jose in his place can hardly be seen as a negative]?
Spot on mate. Just be careful though. Its amazing how quickly you get in trouble on here for challenging other posters' certainty. The only we 'evidence' we have about Rooney's commitment is Moye's words in interviews. Rooney's own silence also speaks volumes.
This reads like it's google translated from another language, and I can't really understand it. Can you rephrase so I know what you're actually asking?
The "angry and confused" line was ran virtually simultaneously by every news organisation in the country, it was much more than the work of 'third-rate sports journos' and was quite clearly fed to the media by Stretford. And nobody is ignoring Moyes' repeated claims that Rooney is working hard in training, far from it, people find it suspicious when this is how Moyes responds each time he's asked if Rooney wants to stay.Which has always been the basis for the hysteria on here. Ignoring Moyes repeatedly saying Rooney is working hard in training and is not for sale, but believing claims by third-rate sports journos that 'inside sources in Rooney's camp' have told them that he's 'upset' or 'dreams of PSG' or whatever other nonsense. And supporting that approach with the usual 'smokescreen', 'you're naive if you think Paul Stretford doesn't run the English media' stuff.