sglowrider
Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
How much are we willing to sell him off for? 28 million squids seems awfully low for Engurlund's first choice striker?
First line of the interview.
"Overall my thought on Wayne is, if for any reason we had an injury to Robin van Persie, we'll need him,"
No matter what he meant by that, it was a fecking stupid thing to say. Had no need to put it like that, unless he was trying to rattle Rooney.
Could have easily just said, "Wayne Rooney remains a very important part of the team."
Maybe I read into it differently than everyone else, but to me it was a case of "These two are my first choice pair, and if anything happens to one I'll really need the other, though I'll still give the other two games".Still, that's hardly a glowing recommendation either. May as well say "aye, I'll pick him the odd time 'cause I have other options, you know"
Doesn't that statements imply no change t the status quo of last season, than RVP is first choice for the No 9 role? That is no great surprise i'd have thought.
However i am also inclined to believe that the club had grown tired of Rooney crouching in the trees giggling away, so loosed the hounds to prompt some movement. There are pros and cons to attempting the Daniel Levy approach, taking this to the wire may not be suit Moyes' plans.
Bit funny that you have to 'read into it' to come to that conclusion, though and that's my point. He should have just mad it abundantly clear that Rooney is a vital part of the team and left the other nonsense out of it.Maybe I read into it differently than everyone else, but to me it was a case of "These two are my first choice pair, and if anything happens to one I'll really need the other, though I'll still give the other two games".
Maybe that's just me though.
Look, if you have a player like Rooney, and you don't want him to leave, when the press ask you stuff about him, you blow smoke up their ass and make everything sound like its rosy.
You don't come out and say you need him if your other striker is injured, no matter what way you meant it.
You mean like the interview before that where Moyes kept telling the press how great he was in training since he'd arrived?
Bit funny that you have to 'read into it' to come to that conclusion, though and that's my point. He should have just mad it abundantly clear that Rooney is a vital part of the team and left the other nonsense out of it.
That's what jumped out at me when I read it. I didn't think "He says Rooney is a back-up" when I saw what he said. Like I say, maybe it's just me and maybe I'm wrong entirely. I just don't think he was calling Rooney a substitute, especially since he said he'd want to play them both. That sounds like a striking partnership to me, not a stater and a back-up.
Meh, I'm bored of it to be honest. I've gone past caring what happens to Wayne Rooney, and don't feel like wasting any more of my precious time discussing him.
Especially when there are transfer threads I can be getting myself banned from.
So I win, then?
It does, thanks.If it pleases you.
There is no comparison.
Everyone knew about Ronaldos wish to play for RM, it wasn't a secret.
SAF got another season out of him, can't say I noticed his desire drop.
At the end of the day if Rooney comes out and says he wants to leave then fine, its his choice.
Its all this fecking about, remember October 2010, he is a complete tool.
Well it's good to know this is all Moyes fault.
ExactlyHas he actually said anything?
I thought it was hilarious to be honest.Extremely daft by Moyes to come out and say that about Rooney.
As a striker obviously. He is miles better than Ba and Torres with Ba/Lukaku being the 2nd choice for them.How and where would he fit at Chelski? Abundance of riches in midfield so they will most likely only play one on top.
Get rid of Torres and rely on Shrek? Lukaku is brilliant talent with hugh Drogba upside.
That's not the case. If United want to sell they can - as it stands they seem to want to keep him for 12 months and see what happens. Will Chelsea wait that long? Doubtful for me.
I see Chelsea have their mouthpiece Martin Lipton on the case. Failure is not an option.
Lipton is a Spurs fan.
The way I read it: he needs both of them, preferably at the same time, with Rooney likely playing the more attacking midfield position. However, were RVP to get injured, he'd need Rooney to lead the line.I genuinely think he meant that RVP and Rooney are his first choice pair, and if anything were to happen to RVP he'd really need to rely on Rooney as one of his senior strikers.
Being England's first choice striker is hardly a ringing endorsement, is it?How much are we willing to sell him off for? 28 million squids seems awfully low for Engurlund's first choice striker?
When Carroll could fetch 35 million pounds, then Rooney is worth ....Being England's first choice striker is hardly a ringing endorsement, is it?
I think most will see the Carroll transfer (much like the Torres one) as a market aberration, rather than some kind of benchmark.When Carroll could fetch 35 million pounds, then Rooney is worth ....
I am going to go on a different tangent here