Wayne Rooney | 2012-14 Performances

Status
Not open for further replies.
If he doesnt want to be here, there's no point keeping him. It isnt good for the dressing room. We arent desperate for him as you rightly said so why keep a player who doesnt want to stay?

Gifting one of our rivals a top quality striker if we can get flog him abroad even at a loss of 10mil doesnt make sense though. Its not as if we're cash strapped and would need that 10mil to buy players either. The league is at its competitive best now and a player like Rooney in top form can swing titles.

Which foreign team would even want him?

PSG have Cavani, Barca have Neymar, Bayern don't want him and I can't see him going to Italy. That leaves Madrid, and I can't really see them wanting him.
 
Actually have some sympathy with Rooney on this one, unless what Moyes said was taken out of context or misinterpreted by the press, it does seem to appear that Moyes only intends to use Rooney as a back up to RVP. Not exactly the smartest thing for a manager to say.
 
I almost agreed with the post until I saw the username. Unless Rooney fetches £35-40m, which top quality players (ie midfielders) can we bring in in this market? Again, there's no way I would wish us to strengthen our domestic rivals with one of our top players just to spite him.


Whats my username got to do with it? If you can get hold of Fabregas for under 30 thats a coup for a start.
 
Actually have some sympathy with Rooney on this one, unless what Moyes said was taken out of context or misinterpreted by the press, it does seem to appear that Moyes only intends to use Rooney as a back up to RVP. Not exactly the smartest thing for a manager to say.

I give up. Rooney could wear a t-shirt saying 'I hate Man Utd fans they're all ugly cnuts'...and some of you lot would still find a way to defend him.
 
Rooney isnt dim. If he understands the message, he'l agree to a move abroad. We're just ruling out selling him to 3 clubs, he's free to go anywhere else. I'd take 10mil less from a Real in a heartbeat. Much higher stakes at play long term than just 10mil in the bank if we sell him to City or Chelsea.


Why should he? If he wants to go to Chelsea he will end up their. Very little United can do about it. Just look at Arsenal and RVP.
 
Whats my username got to do with it? If you can get hold of Fabregas for under 30 thats a coup for a start.
Your username indicates you're a Chelsea fan, which means you're speaking from a totally different perspective than most of us United fans.

Anyway, a big good luck to anybody who wants to capture Fabregas for under 30. Under 40 and it's still stretching it.
 
But like I said if we think Rooney can get back to his best why are we letting him go? We've not heard anything about him being a dressing room problem, him calling his team mates not good enough in 2010 for a pay rise didn't seem to cause too many problems.

As for selling to Chelsea/City, they're mega rich anyway, if they want a top striker they can go buy one, if we're saying we don't think Rooney is good enough anymore and if we know we can get a replacement like Fabregas than we shouldn't worry about it too much. I agree that for a couple million it would be better to send him away, but I think talking about £25m and £35m for example is a big difference. We've missed out on signing top players for differences smaller than that by most reports.


Rooney can get back to his best at a club where he wants to play. He's not professional enough to fire in 30 goals a season and put in great performances if he's wanting away all the time. Last season was a good indicator of that. Stats aside, he was far from his best. If its true that he's been wanting away for a good part of last season, that'd explain it.

Money alone cant buy a top striker. With Falcao and Cavani gone, which striker of Rooney's ability is available? None. They could be willing to spend 50mil but they have no hope of buying a top class striker like Rooney because there arent any available atm. 10mil isnt much for a club like ours. We have the cash to spend and 10mil less wouldnt change anything. Most players that we've missed out on recently, like hazard, lucas etc, its been because we dont think they're worth what the selling club wants. Not because we couldnt afford it. There's a difference. You think we couldnt pay 6mil to Hazard's agent? We could but we didnt on principle as no agent deserves that much. Similarly in Lucas's case when PSG just made an absurb last minute bid.
 
Actually have some sympathy with Rooney on this one, unless what Moyes said was taken out of context or misinterpreted by the press, it does seem to appear that Moyes only intends to use Rooney as a back up to RVP. Not exactly the smartest thing for a manager to say.

Back up for the No 9 position, what was unreasonable about that in principle? Reflective of last season and what many observers would expect.
 
Why should he? If he wants to go to Chelsea he will end up their. Very little United can do about it. Just look at Arsenal and RVP.
Almost incomparable situation, isn't it? RVP can stay for another season and Arsenal will lose him for free, which tied their hands a lot. Rooney/Chelsea can't afford to wait for 2 years.
 
40m isn't that big a deal for a club like United. It'll cost us a lot more when Rooney is firing in 30 goals a season for Chelsea and helping them win the league.

fecking hell, he has scored only two times in his 9 seasons here 30 or more goals for season. I don't expect him to ever do that and it's very possible that he is past his best.
 
Are you serious? HE deserves respect?

Have people just all buried there heads in the sand or something?

Noodle's right. feck him off. Too whoever pays the most.
Wouldn't have said it if I wasn't. He has scored 197 goals for us, and has made 400 appearances for the club. He has been a main man in a side that has won 5 Premier League Titles; European Cup; 2 League Cups, and 3 Community Shields. I understand why people are annoyed at how he has treated the club at times but I think that people need to look at the bigger picture before they speak about him in such a way.
 
Almost incomparable situation, isn't it? RVP can stay for another season and Arsenal will lose him for free, which tied their hands a lot. Rooney/Chelsea can't afford to wait for 2 years.


And United cant afford to have a player on such a big wage in the reserves.
 
fecking hell, he has scored only two times in his 9 seasons here 30 or more goals for season. I don't expect him to ever do that and it's very possible that he is past his best.

And those 2 seasons he was playing mainly as the out and out striker, where he would play for Chelsea.
 
Wouldn't have said it if I wasn't. He has scored 197 goals for us, and has made 400 appearances for the club. He has been a main man in a side that has won 5 Premier League Titles; European Cup; 2 League Cups, and 3 Community Shields. I understand why people are annoyed at how he has treated the club at times but I think that people need to look at the bigger picture before they speak about him in such a way.


You talk as if he's done us a favor. Nobody was talking like this about him before all the shit couple of years back. Hell, most even forgave him after that. The cnut has pissed on our faces though if he wants a move out again. Respect him my ass.
 
Why should he? If he wants to go to Chelsea he will end up their. Very little United can do about it. Just look at Arsenal and RVP.

That's not the case. If United want to sell they can - as it stands they seem to want to keep him for 12 months and see what happens. Will Chelsea wait that long? Doubtful for me.

Rooney seems to want Chelsea because Jose has stroked his ego and he thinks the grass is greener - perhaps he thinks its the answer to his problems. Fact is he's not the player he was, whether he can get back to where he was, who knows. Will any club risk £200k a week over 5 years? I'm not sure.

The club may not do what Arsenal did and see the fee as the bottom line.
 
And United cant afford to have a player on such a big wage in the reserves.
Well Chelsea is not the only destination, is it? I'm merely saying that players don't have absolute power as you stated, and RVP is not a good example. For every RVP, there's a Heinze.

Or what Varun said.
 
I return from the wilderness to bring calm in this time of strife. Verily my prophecies shall come to pass. Wayne and Waynetta shall soon be in london, Utd will sign two excellent players and roll on as we always do.

Have faith little ones

I really should lay off the stella
 
If he doesnt agree to move abroad what do we do next?


We tell him clearly that he doesnt have a choice. He'l buckle down and accept. He's not going to throw away 2 years of his career just because he wants to play for Chelsea.
 
And those 2 seasons he was playing mainly as the out and out striker, where he would play for Chelsea.

Different club, different player, different manager. A few years older. Rooney doesn't look to have the work ethic to age well and if he goes abroad I will be surprised if he doesn't do a Kaka'. In England he'll do well, but I doesn't expect him to be a 30 goal striker for season, and especially not for 5 years like another poster mentioned. I would prefer to sell him abroad, but wouldn't care that much if he goes to Chelsea.
 
Rooney can get back to his best at a club where he wants to play. He's not professional enough to fire in 30 goals a season and put in great performances if he's wanting away all the time. Last season was a good indicator of that. Stats aside, he was far from his best. If its true that he's been wanting away for a good part of last season, that'd explain it.

Money alone cant buy a top striker. With Falcao and Cavani gone, which striker of Rooney's ability is available? None. They could be willing to spend 50mil but they have no hope of buying a top class striker like Rooney because there arent any available atm. 10mil isnt much for a club like ours. We have the cash to spend and 10mil less wouldnt change anything. Most players that we've missed out on recently, like hazard, lucas etc, its been because we dont think they're worth what the selling club wants. Not because we couldnt afford it. There's a difference. You think we couldnt pay 6mil to Hazard's agent? We could but we didnt on principle as no agent deserves that much. Similarly in Lucas's case when PSG just made an absurb last minute bid.


No my point was that we make distinctions between paying an extra say £6m for Hazard and pull out of the race, so why would be accept say £10m less for Rooney? If we place such strict valuations on players we will sign, and supposedly our wages judging by the Nani situation, then I don't see why we'd let £10m slip. Also as for principle, I don't buy that because Bebe was one bigger agent fee.

As for other strikers they're always someone, Imbra looks like he'll be free, he could tide them over for two seasons or so whilst they keep waiting or who knows what will happen with Lakuku in a few seasons. Benzema equally can be a top striker as much as Rooney can. Plus I'm sure there are other gems out there, I didn't know much about drogba before he came.

Personally I think unless Rooney was being really unprofessional at £20m I'd rather keep him, definitely think he's more than worth that over 2 seasons even if he is below poor, which personally I think is being exaggerated, a poor finish to the season but he was alright before that if not near his best.
 
We tell him clearly that he doesnt have a choice. He'l buckle down and accept. He's not going to throw away 2 years of his career just because he wants to play for Chelsea.

If it was Madrid or Bayern then yeah of course he would move, but they aren't interested.

I don't even think he would want to go to PSG anymore, he would be just as 'second choice' there as at United
 
:smirk:

Chelsea supporting caller rushes to Rooney's defence on Talksport. Are they already claiming him as one of their own? lol
 
Personally I think unless Rooney was being really unprofessional at £20m I'd rather keep him, definitely think he's more than worth that over 2 seasons even if he is below poor, which personally I think is being exaggerated, a poor finish to the season but he was alright before that if not near his best.

He'll get 25-30m in wages during those two years which means that we'll lose around 50m. An unmotivated fat cnutish Rooney isn't worth 50m. Now he does want to play as a striker when he has zero chance of doing that and has been looking to get out of the team. Does anybody believe that he somehow magically will turn to be a nice boy and be on his best form?
 
No my point was that we make distinctions between paying an extra say £6m for Hazard and pull out of the race, so why would be accept say £10m less for Rooney? If we place such strict valuations on players we will sign, and supposedly our wages judging by the Nani situation, then I don't see why we'd let £10m slip. Also as for principle, I don't buy that because Bebe was one bigger agent fee.

As for other strikers they're always someone, Imbra looks like he'll be free, he could tide them over for two seasons or so whilst they keep waiting or who knows what will happen with Lakuku in a few seasons. Benzema equally can be a top striker as much as Rooney can. Plus I'm sure there are other gems out there, I didn't know much about drogba before he came.

Personally I think unless Rooney was being really unprofessional at £20m I'd rather keep him, definitely think he's more than worth that over 2 seasons even if he is below poor, which personally I think is being exaggerated, a poor finish to the season but he was alright before that if not near his best.


Because hazard's agent wanted 6mil on top of the 34mil transfer fee and Hazard's signing on fee. It was ridiculous. Its a matter of principle and also ensuring that future players we sign dont make similar demands. Bebe's case was totally different as the fee wasnt even comparable. In any case, I always thought something was wrong about that deal.

PSG will have no reason to sell Ibra. They dont need the cash. Lukaku, as big a talent as he is, isnt currently close to Rooney. Chelsea want a top striker now, not 2 seasons down the line. Same with other gems you talk of.

He's on 200k a week which amounts to 10mil a year. We'd break even on a 10mil cheaper sale just by the savings we make on his wages. The dressing room atmosphere is another big factor. More than anything, in our manager's 1st season at the club, I'd rather he focused on the football than have to deal with a wantaway player all season long. The sooner we sort this out, better for us.
 
If it was Madrid or Bayern then yeah of course he would move, but they aren't interested.

I don't even think he would want to go to PSG anymore, he would be just as 'second choice' there as at United


Madrid would be at 30mil. They can recoup almost the entire fee by selling Higuain alone.
 
And this insider information on how footballers and their agents really do things comes from...? People always talk about the fact that every rumour is deliberately 'leaked' from a player or an agent or a manager or a club but no one has ever actually proven that it happens all the time. It's just another instance of people preferring to believe anything except the fact that the sports media need to fill their webpages with stuff that gets hits, and rumours are the way to do that.


The way the story is worded and the repeated use of "angry and confused" across outlets sell this as a leaked story.

But suppose the story isn't leaked. It is incredibly easy for Rooney to issue a denial. Just a tweet. "The stories on Sky Sports and BBC are rubbish." I'm assuming no such denial will be forthcoming and that therefore even in the world in which this story is a simple page-view grabbing fabrication Rooney doesn't see any point in ending the speculation. Perhaps it would be ridiculous to expect him to deny every false story printed about him. Perhaps not when the story in question concerns his future, a desire for a move that has been publicly admitted by Ferguson, and is resulting in our new manager being hounded by the media at every opportunity.
 
He'll get 25-30m in wages during those two years which means that we'll lose around 50m. An unmotivated fat cnutish Rooney isn't worth 50m. Now he does want to play as a striker when he has zero chance of doing that and has been looking to get out of the team. Does anybody believe that he somehow magically will turn to be a nice boy and be on his best form?


Well again that depends on a number of things, ultimately he wouldn't be on the wage he is if we didn't think he was good enough to get that and I don't see why one below par season chages that. Everyone is quick to jump in and say he offers nothing without his focus but we simply don't know how much this is true. Did we hear murmurings from Rooney when he was asked to play the diamond, or left wing etc? No. He got on with it, he wasn't always at his best but if you can find me a player outside messi and ronaldo who currently is always producing then I'd be surprised. From what we've heard from they players he seems to still be impressing them this season.

It was only in the last few weeks following the rumors about the chat with Fergie that it suddenly became about him wanting out and his entire season being rewritten. A conversation we still don't know the full extent off. I don't think if we kept him he'd suddenly turn great but at the same time I don't think we can say conclusively he'd just be doing nothing. As we all know he's a guy who needs to play regularly and whatever you think of him you know he wants to do his best on the pitch and with a WC coming up it doesn't suit him to just sit around and sulk all season.

Plus theres's the factor of where he wants to go. If he wants chelsea then that's where he'll go unless we make him see his contract out. Same with RVP, I can't imagine that not one foreign club was interested in him, but he wanted us and came as a result.
 
But suppose the story isn't leaked. It is incredibly easy for Rooney to issue a denial. Just a tweet. "The stories on Sky Sports and BBC are rubbish." I'm assuming no such denial will be forthcoming and that therefore even in the world in which this story is a simple page-view grabbing fabrication Rooney doesn't see any point in ending the speculation. Perhaps it would be ridiculous to expect him to deny every false story printed about him. Perhaps not when the story in question concerns his future, a desire for a move that has been publicly admitted by Ferguson, and is resulting in our new manager being hounded by the media at every opportunity.

How many denials a week is he going to have to issue. The media nod along for a day or so then come out with another 'Rooney unhappy' rumour.

I reckon Moyes and Rooney know what's going on with each other. I don't see why Rooney should give a feck about correcting every little made up story in the press. If you're naive enough to believe everything you read that's your problem, not Rooney's.

The way the story is worded and the repeated use of "angry and confused" across outlets sell this as a leaked story.

As for this... the wording of the story provides proof that it's a leak from Rooney's camp because that is what a paranoid fan wants to believe? Seems legit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.