Zen86
Full Member
Why does it matter if one is better or more important than the other?
It doesn't, that's just how it inevitably pans out in the Rooney and RVP threads though.
Why does it matter if one is better or more important than the other?
Why does it matter if one is better or more important than the other?
It doesn't, that's just how it inevitably pans out in the Rooney and RVP threads though.
Well it tends to start off with people suggesting that selling him wouldn't have a major effect on us.
You mean the timeframe when RVP has finally gotten free of injuries and been the better player? Yes, because that is exactly how you compare players. If Suarez out performs RVP for the next two years I'll have to admit he'll be the better player then irrespective of what happened 5 years prior.
And I'm not even talking about there being some 2 year limit on this. You always choose the "recent past" when comparing players surely, whether you want to consider that as 2 or 4 years, whatever. But taking a decade makes no sense whatsoever.
Technically only the present should be relevant in comparing player as of today but because it's too short a period as an indicator we take a longer period, but that doesn't mean we overdo it and take an abnormally long period.
I think the majority just want to see Rooney firing In his top form consistently. We all know what he can do, if only he could string that form together for more than a few games in a row it would be great. Him and rvp could be a legendary partnership
Since Ronaldo left United, Rooney has scored 100 goals in 158 games. 0.63 gpg. That's before we factor in assists, and his importance in terms of linking our midfield and attack (we're undoubtedly a more cohesive side when Rooney plays).
In the same period, van Persie has 92 goals in 133 games. 0.69 gpg.
What do I infer from this? RvP has a marginally better strike rate, though this could be attributed to Rooney's more variable position. Overall, we have two world class strikers with a happy knack of finding the net. Why do so many fans frame it as an issue of one versus the other? They're on the same team and we play them as a fecking partnership!
Since Ronaldo left United, Rooney has scored 100 goals in 158 games. 0.63 gpg. That's before we factor in assists, and his importance in terms of linking our midfield and attack (we're undoubtedly a more cohesive side when Rooney plays).
In the same period, van Persie has 92 goals in 133 games. 0.69 gpg.
What do I infer from this? RvP has a marginally better strike rate, though this could be attributed to Rooney's more variable position. Overall, we have two world class strikers with a happy knack of finding the net. Why do so many fans frame it as an issue of one versus the other? They're on the same team and we play them as a fecking partnership!
While I think Rooney is the better player, I don't think there's a particular gulf between them. I only take up the argument because Van Persie, much like Tevez in his first season, is now used as a stick with which to beat Rooney, for whatever reason.
Rooney is our best player and makes us tick. RVP is the icing on the cake but Rooney is our heart beat. Hope he is fit for tmrw as when Wayne plays well we win.
Since Ronaldo left United, Rooney has scored 100 goals in 158 games. 0.63 gpg. That's before we factor in assists, and his importance in terms of linking our midfield and attack (we're undoubtedly a more cohesive side when Rooney plays).
In the same period, van Persie has 92 goals in 133 games. 0.69 gpg.
What do I infer from this? RvP has a marginally better strike rate, though this could be attributed to Rooney's more variable position. Overall, we have two world class strikers with a happy knack of finding the net. Why do so many fans frame it as an issue of one versus the other? They're on the same team and we play them as a fecking partnership!
I think the majority just want to see Rooney firing In his top form consistently. We all know what he can do, if only he could string that form together for more than a few games in a row it would be great. Him and rvp could be a legendary partnership
There's very few people who still are upset at him for holding the club at ransom.
Perhaps part of the issue is that fans go a bit overboard in their praise for Rooney as well as with their criticism. There's very few people who still are upset at him for holding the club at ransom. You shouldn't blow it off either. He made a mistake. One which would have hurt him more than us. It was stupid and at the time a very big deal. Are you trying to say publicly questioning your employers is not a big deal?
The only thing that really bothers me is that some fans act as if Rooney can do no wrong. Or the idea that RvP is better than him is appalling. Even when he's playing shite, an excuse has to be found. Why? If you're not playing well, you're not playing well. In terms of overall play, he's not a consistent player. The only reason it's okay is because he's still finding ways to score even when he's having a mediocre day. I haven't seen him do anything on an abysmal day though. Therefore, to me, the heartbeat idea doesnt make sense. It's simply filled with misguided sentimentality. They say he makes us tick but what has he done recently that has shown that? I thought that's what Carrick does. You see what I mean? Saying such things sound great but I'm not sure what value it really has if it's not well-reflected in reality. It may have been true at some point but I'm not sure how anyone can come to the conclusion now. That's just my take. Feel free to disagree.
That being said, I'm glad we have him because now him and Rvp can share the burden of being the main man. It shouldn't matter who is the best or most important player. What matters is helping United win games. Both players improve the team. Whether both are starting or one of them. For me it's not to fun discuss who is the better player when people start getting butt-hurt about some of the views being expressed. It's what happens every single time.
You would think people would talk about why their partnership hasn't really bloomed into life as we thought it would. I guess it's more interesting to try and convince someone on the internet why one striker is better than the other.
The reason you get people defending Rooney in here is because if you go back in this thread (you dont have to go too far) you will find comments suggesting Rooney should go and find form in the reserves - despite being our current in form striker, he should be sold - one poster suggested selling him just before he breaks Sir Bobby's record, he will never be a club legend even if he breaks the goal scoring records because of the contract situation, that he isn't that important to the team and that there is some huge gulf between him and RvP. Posts like these will always provoke a reaction.
RvP seems exempt from criticism this season regardless of form probably because of how well he played earlier in the season and because he's still all shiny and new, but people forget Rooney has given us great service for almost a decade now helping us to win many trophies during his career here, not just two thirds of a season. There is a lot of short-sightedness in regard to Rooney. And those citing the contract issue conveniently forget there are many club heroes here who have had issues with the club in some shape or form.
Of course questioning your employers is a big deal. But it was years ago and was dealt with at the time - SAF publicly took him to task and he apologised to the squad. I don't see why it's even still relevant.
He clearly can do wrong, but you surely see that Rooney is judged against higher standards than anyone else in the squad? He is pilloried for his below par performances unlike any other player, something I believe is linked to the transfer request we're discussing.
I don't think it's ludicrous to suggest RvP is slightly superior to Rooney, just like I think a case be could made to say that Rooney just edges it. What I have consistently railed against though is the idea that RvP is "easily" better, something a lot of fans argued when he was in great form earlier in the season.
Obviously, saying Rooney is the "heartbeat" of the team is an emotive way of framing his importance to us. Maybe that is too strong, but he's undoubtedly a key player. Same as RvP.
I've no interest in carrying on debating the importance of Rooney to the club - anyone who thinks we should jettison him is delusional frankly (not saying you are, more of a general point). Even if you don't think he's a great forward, trying to replace 100 goals in 158 games (plus countless assists) would be nigh on impossible for a reasonable price.
The reason you get people defending Rooney in here is because if you go back in this thread (you dont have to go too far) you will find comments suggesting Rooney should go and find form in the reserves - despite being our current in form striker, he should be sold - one poster suggested selling him just before he breaks Sir Bobby's record, he will never be a club legend even if he breaks the goal scoring records because of the contract situation, that he isn't that important to the team and that there is some huge gulf between him and RvP. Posts like these will always provoke a reaction.
RvP seems exempt from criticism this season regardless of form probably because of how well he played earlier in the season and because he's still all shiny and new, but people forget Rooney has given us great service for almost a decade now helping us to win many trophies during his career here, not just two thirds of a season. There is a lot of short-sightedness in regard to Rooney. And those citing the contract issue conveniently forget there are many club heroes here who have had issues with the club in some shape or form.
He questioned our ambition. He can feck himself for all I care.
To be honest, I hope he's sold before he becomes our top scorer. That accolade should stay with someone who deserves it. Which, IMO and perhaps counter-intuitively, is about more than just goals.
Plato, the thing is though, this poor season of Rooney's is being massively exaggerated. Rooney's poor games on a personal level? Everton away and Swansea away. The other games people cite where he didn't play well like second half against Chelsea at home in the FA Cup, the entire team as a collective played equally as poor, we could barely string two passes together in that half and with a pass completion of 88% clearly Rooney wasn't the biggest culprit re giving the ball away (Carrick only had 1% more than Rooney and Valencia's was a shocking 56% for comparison purposes) but still he comes under the most stick and people suggest we should sell him
Rooney's season has been stop-start due to injury and various niggles yet he's posting stats bettering Mata who plays in the same position and has played a lot more games and yet people would argue Mata is having his best season and Rooney one of his worst. In this injury hit season Rooney is scoring and making goals at his best ever rate in the PL. Tell me why that should be overlooked because of the odd short pass or sloppy touch? The point is that when Rooney isn't having his best ever game he still contributes and that's important.
No one is in here suggesting that Rooney is the third best in the world and that he's putting in world beating performances every week.
Because you haven't seen the posts (multiple, from different posters) I'm talking about so you probably don't know the context of the conversations. I've quoted the one you're justifying below, but nobody suggested Rooney be kept for the sole purpose of breaking a record that would be silly, someone just suggested that the player who will likely break Sir Bobby's record should get a bit more credit. I agree.
Rooney is our best player and makes us tick. RVP is the icing on the cake but Rooney is our heart beat. Hope he is fit for tmrw as when Wayne plays well we win.
Thing is, you make it sound cut and dried. There's been very little between Rooney and RvP over the last three years. Their statistics tell you this.
I don't understand why some posters are so bum-hurt over Rooney questioning the club's ambition, when, at the time, most of the fans were doing the same! We did need to pull our finger out of our arse and improve the squad. Who cares if Rooney 'held the club to ransom' to get a new deal. Happens all the time in non-footballing occupations too.
The way I see it is that we have a terrific player in Rooney, who gets unbelievable stick because fans are letting petty vendettas get in the way of logic.
It is clear to me that Rvp is better. I never said he was on a different level. Both are top players.Thing is, you make it sound cut and dried. There's been very little between Rooney and RvP over the last three years. Their statistics tell you this.
I don't understand why some posters are so bum-hurt over Rooney questioning the club's ambition, when, at the time, most of the fans were doing the same! We did need to pull our finger out of our arse and improve the squad. Who cares if Rooney 'held the club to ransom' to get a new deal. Happens all the time in non-footballing occupations too.
The way I see it is that we have a terrific player in Rooney, who gets unbelievable stick because fans are letting petty vendettas get in the way of logic.
I didn't mean he hadn't changed (he scores twice as many goals now than he did as a kid, for example, and boots the ball into the stands once a month rather than twice a half), merely that people use the phrase to imply he's gone downhill.
Wow, you edited your original post to try and make me look bad...that's hilariously pathetic. I'm embarrassed for you, genuinely.
This sentence was not on your post when I responded to it:
"That's not me saying he's shit, it's me saying his game has changed."
edit: I'm also pretty sure it was all one paragraph, and that it originally ended with another line, but can't quite recall.