wr8_utd
Ripped :'(
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Messages
- 38,822
Maybe because this nonsense has been made up by the media only after the Madrid match. It's just the papers milking the situation to sell more.
Long story short- Fergie said it millions times- he always plans ahead, when he picks players for a particular game he has a squad for the next two in his mind already. Rooney will play against Chelsea that's for sure.
It was not strange at all though. Fergie only wanted 1 striker on the pitch, and chose RVP to lead the line instead for this game, probably because he caused them so many problems in the first game.
Rooney is good at what he does, but why shoehorn him into a side just because of his name? giggs and welbeck did that alonso/wide role better than rooney would of done.
He hardly looked angry when coming on either? he obviously knew for tactical reasons he was not starting, and that he will start against chelsea.
Didnt fergie say he didnt think he was fully match fit also before the game?
No. He said it was purely tactical. Which is obviously true. Doesn't make it any less strange thoufgh.
He also said he felt like Wayne needed a game or two.
A lot depends on if Fergie himself is still the manager in the summer. I'm slightly less certain of that after Tuesday's match.
No smoke without fire. All is not well IMO.
A lot depends on if Fergie himself is still the manager in the summer. I'm slightly less certain of that after Tuesday's match.
Sure just like with the Nani situation, always truth in the press
Sure just like with the Nani situation, always truth in the press
No smoke without fire. All is not well IMO.
Jesus Randall this is bad, even by your shitty standards.
You think it is normal to leave out one of the biggest players for such a game?
You are being naïve.
Shitty standards as opposed to Crackers?
You think it is normal to leave out one of the biggest players for such a game?
Okay, where would you have played him then?
I am not for a second saying he will leave by the way. And I am certain Fergie will deny it if asked.
But I am saying there is most likely an issue between Rooney and the club.
3 or so years ago Rooney had Utd in a bad position and they bent over. Now Rooney does not have the same luxury.
I still think he is our best player, but if he is not putting in the work or is causing problems he will be gone.
Difficult to know whats going on here, but as usual a certain amount of lazy journalism is going on. Rooney was dropped because Jones was injured and we needed Giggs in midfield to slow down Madrid. Welbeck and Nani were better options on the wings than Rooney. The bigger story is that many feel that Rooney has not reached the level that he should have reached. It was said a few weeks ago on Irish TV by a journalist that he heard from somebody that knows SAF ( yeah I know, one of those), that SAF believes that Rooney is not as self confident as many great players and thus SAF does not trust him for the big occasions. Maybe this is true, maybe not.
It is inconceivable that the Wayne Rooney of 2009/10 or the latter half of 2010/11 would have been dropped on Tuesday night but this season's Rooney isn't that player. By his own standards Rooney's all around game, particularly his first touch and passing have not been what we've come to expect from him lately.
Rooney has not been bad but he has not been so much better than Welbeck or Nani lately that he should have been an automatic starter. In the second half against Norwich he showed some of his old self in his interplay with Kagawa but anyone watching Rooney this year would say he hasn't consistently played above 7 out of 10 level. The things you might expect from say Robin Van Persie e.g. brilliant control always, ability to hold the ball consistently and lay it off to a team mate the things in past years you'd have got from Wazza just haven't been there this year.
On form, rather than reputation, Rooney didn't deserve to start and so he wasn't picked. That being said I expect him to run riot against Chelsea on Sunday.