pocco
loco
Re Osimhen, it's mad how quickly opinions have changed of him. Just go back to the first page for a little taste of previous opinions.
What a clown. You react like that and come at me for my "football opinions" when you're spouting shite like this. Thank god you're on limited posts. "Rare talent"
I mean, is it really mad? This is Osimhen's first top quality season. I think he had some annoying injuries in previous years and such that could explain it but he wasn't always like this.Re Osimhen, it's mad how quickly opinions have changed of him. Just go back to the first page for a little taste of previous opinions.
Re Osimhen, it's mad how quickly opinions have changed of him. Just go back to the first page for a little taste of previous opinions.
Yeah he looks a very interesting player.
Aye I thought it was pretty harsh mindThat went well Out of the second leg as well so a bit of a damp squib
I don't think he's on different level this season than he was last season before the injury. He gets the universal recognition now because our link with him, and Napoli is currently one of most in form teams in Europe with him being their top scorer.I mean, is it really mad? This is Osimhen's first top quality season. I think he had some annoying injuries in previous years and such that could explain it but he wasn't always like this.
Reminds me of Salah exploding in 2017/18 while looking like your average pace merchant at Roma.
His and that Georgian fella's price tags will be through the roof after all is said and done.
I do wonder how he'd gel with Rashford. Marcus would obviously benefit from his high-intensity work-rate, but might find himself making similar runs on the break. I can't really imagine Rashford feeing off him too well, or vice-versa.
I have thought similar. I dont think they'd be the right pairing myself.
I'd actually prefer Vlahovic to him I think. Think he would compliment what we already have a lot more.
Napoli themselves paid £70m for Osimhen so no chance of that. He'll likely cost north of £100m if Napoli sell.Why aren't Real in for this bloke if he is any good or Chelsea come to that?
If we are the only ones interested then we should not pay more than 50-60mil as he is performing in basically a geriatric league.
Napoli themselves paid £70m for Osimhen so no chance of that. He'll likely cost north of £100m if Napoli sell.
Osimhen is going to cost £120m i would bet....while he's a fantastic striker i think you could get Khvicha for 60-65m considering he only cost them 12m and Kudus for probably 40-45m. That IMO would be a much smarter move by United.
Napoli would have to pay more to replace him. Napoli normally is difficult to negotiate with. No way now with a Serie A title and stable CL income, they do a fast one when he's every potential to become 100mil+ player.Osimhen is going to cost £120m i would bet....while he's a fantastic striker i think you could get Khvicha for 60-65m considering he only cost them 12m and Kudus for probably 40-45m. That IMO would be a much smarter move by United.
Why aren't Real in for this bloke if he is any good or Chelsea come to that?
If we are the only ones interested then we should not pay more than 50-60mil as he is performing in basically a geriatric league.
That’s a joke right? Based on this season form I am sure 50-60m wouldn’t be enough to buy his left leg or something. If I remembered correctly before this season starts Napoli is already asking 100m for him. His stocks has surely gone sky high since then.Why aren't Real in for this bloke if he is any good or Chelsea come to that?
If we are the only ones interested then we should not pay more than 50-60mil as he is performing in basically a geriatric league.
Because he is valued at 130m, Real Madrid have Benzema who is still world class, so.... Yeah. Chelsea is in for him of course but different question is if he'd want to leave a genuine dark horse for the CL who will win the title for a random other team who isn't competing. Which the answer seems like no.Why aren't Real in for this bloke if he is any good or Chelsea come to that?
If we are the only ones interested then we should not pay more than 50-60mil as he is performing in basically a geriatric league.
I do wonder how he'd gel with Rashford. Marcus would obviously benefit from his high-intensity work-rate, but might find himself making similar runs on the break. I can't really imagine Rashford feeing off him too well, or vice-versa.
He doesn't go wide of either center back very often when I've seem him for Napoli, so the left side of the pitch should still be open for Rashford. We'd play with them basically up top and then either Antony wide right, Bruno tucked in right to give us 4 in midfield or Amad maybe in time able to play both ways.
So I think the spacing is fine. Osimhen seems to properly occupy both CBs at all times, so you get Rashford 1 on 1 vs the RB, and my guess is we'd probably see a fair bit more 3/5 at the back from teams that are comfortable playing both, so like another 5 or 6 times a season.
His goalscoring has just taken off this season. He used to miss quite a few sitters every now and then, now he is converting half chances. Some of the goals he has scored would have very low xGComparing Osimhen so far this season with Haaland's last four seasons (so including stats from the weaker German league as well as his stats so far in England), per 90 and without penalties.
Osimhen - 1.03 goals, 0.71 xG
Haaland 19/20 - 1.10 goals, 0.74 xG
Haaland 20/21 - 0.93 goals, 0.76 xG
Haaland 21/22 - 0.75 goals, 0.62 xG
Haaland 22/23 - 1.06 goals, 0.72 xG
So he's effectively having a Haaland-level goalscoring season. And while his previous two seasons weren't as good, they still stack up just fine compared to some other top strikers we might have an interest in.
Osimhen 20/21 - 0.57 goals, 0.61 xG
Osimhen 21/22 - 0.64 goals, 0.48 xG
Kane 19/20 - 0.56 goals, 0.38 xG
Kane 20/21 - 0.55 goals, 0.49 xG
Kane 21/22 - 0.36 goals, 0.43 xG
Kane 22/23 - 0.63 goals, 0.45 xG
Obviously Kane was performing in a tougher league across those seasons, but then he was also a lot further along in his development at 26-29 years old than Osimhen at 21-23.
And because people sometimes make the "Lukaku tore up Serie A as well" argument as a diss, a comparison of the two to highlight the difference.
Osimhen 20/21 - 0.57 goals, 0.61 xG
Osimhen 21/22 - 0.64 goals, 0.48 xG
Osimhen 22/23 - 1.03 goals, 0.71 xG
Lukaku 17/18 - 0.50 goals, 0.39
Lukaku 18/19 - 0.51 goals, 0.44
Lukaku 19/20 - 0.51 goals, 0.43
Lukaku 20/21 - 0.56 goals, 0.57
So whether for United or Inter, peak Lukaku's best season wasn't as good as the worst of Osimhen's three at Napoli thus far, let alone his best in which he is scoring at quite literally twice the rate.
In this case I don't think the numbers lie, this guy is a straightforward elite striker.
Kvara is already 100m +, though I don't think he would want to go. Long term I only really see him going to Barca or Arsenal if he wants to come to the prem and they keep it up. Maybe Bayern too. Given the fee I just think the others won't push for him given loads of teams have quality LWs where spending over 100m isn't the best idea. So in that case, they just keep him.Osimhen is going to cost £120m i would bet....while he's a fantastic striker i think you could get Khvicha for 60-65m considering he only cost them 12m and Kudus for probably 40-45m. That IMO would be a much smarter move by United.
I’ll admit I know very little about the player from what I read he’s the kind of CF who plays on the edge of the last defender. That’s one thing that makes me wary. For the fee quoted I’d want a striker capable of holding the ball up well in congested spaces and linking play well which by all accounts isn’t part of his skill set.I've seen enough of Osimhen in Serie A and CL to know that he's a legit (15 to 20+ in domestic league) scoring CF with movement, power, pace, and finishing ability. He also is committed to working off the ball when it comes to pressing and closing down. His mentality seems to be good and healthy, as in very driven to succeed.
Final question marks include:
- Ability to get others involved on the ball (i.e. link up play, passing, decoy runs to make space - he won't be as 1 dimensional in EtH's system like Haaland is for City)
- Mentality and attitude when it's team first EtH ball and if he's not directly scoring (can he check his ego at the door)
- Injury record (he's been relatively injury free during 22/23 season, thus his output is very good)
- How much can he impact the team without much service (his physical superiority in Serie A is very clear and the service he gets has been consistently very good - EtH continues to talk about Rashford getting into the correct places and timing, Osimhen will need to adapt and improve in this regard as well if he comes into the club)
- How he jives with another tip of the spear player like Marcus
If United go for him and get him, they still need a viable backup even like Wout and/or Martial because of all the question marks on Osimhen, injuries are the great equalizer. Cannot put all the center forward eggs in his basket, as United really need to invest in another backup.
I’ll admit I know very little about the player from what I read he’s the kind of CF who plays on the edge of the last defender. That’s one thing that makes me wary. For the fee quoted I’d want a striker capable of holding the ball up well in congested spaces and linking play well which by all accounts isn’t part of his skill set.
I’d take a slightly less prolific striker to get someone who does that as I do think with Bruno, Sancho, Antony and Rashford we have creativity and goals to make up for it. But another player on the periphery of games will hurt us and push us further towards the usual counter attack United we have been for years. That’s why we look so good whenMartial is fit and contributing as his link up play is quality.
And he gets better every season. As with strikers the older they get the better their finishing bcomes. So signing him seems like a no brainer if we can't get Kane.Comparing Osimhen so far this season with Haaland's last four seasons (so including stats from the weaker German league as well as his stats so far in England), per 90 and without penalties.
Osimhen - 1.03 goals, 0.71 xG
Haaland 19/20 - 1.10 goals, 0.74 xG
Haaland 20/21 - 0.93 goals, 0.76 xG
Haaland 21/22 - 0.75 goals, 0.62 xG
Haaland 22/23 - 1.06 goals, 0.72 xG
So he's effectively having a Haaland-level goalscoring season. And while his previous two seasons weren't as good, they still stack up just fine compared to some other top strikers we might have an interest in.
Osimhen 20/21 - 0.57 goals, 0.61 xG
Osimhen 21/22 - 0.64 goals, 0.48 xG
Kane 19/20 - 0.56 goals, 0.38 xG
Kane 20/21 - 0.55 goals, 0.49 xG
Kane 21/22 - 0.36 goals, 0.43 xG
Kane 22/23 - 0.63 goals, 0.45 xG
Obviously Kane was performing in a tougher league across those seasons, but then he was also a lot further along in his development at 26-29 years old than Osimhen at 21-23.
And because people sometimes make the "Lukaku tore up Serie A as well" argument as a diss, a comparison of the two to highlight the difference.
Osimhen 20/21 - 0.57 goals, 0.61 xG
Osimhen 21/22 - 0.64 goals, 0.48 xG
Osimhen 22/23 - 1.03 goals, 0.71 xG
Lukaku 17/18 - 0.50 goals, 0.39
Lukaku 18/19 - 0.51 goals, 0.44
Lukaku 19/20 - 0.51 goals, 0.43
Lukaku 20/21 - 0.56 goals, 0.57
So whether for United or Inter, peak Lukaku's best season wasn't as good as the worst of Osimhen's three at Napoli thus far, let alone his best in which he is scoring at quite literally twice the rate.
In this case I don't think the numbers lie, this guy is a straightforward elite striker.
Absolutely. I think we have a lot of impact players especially our main two - Bruno and Rashford who can at times be really sloppy and not involved (latter) in the buildup so to offset that you need a centre forward who play calmly out of trouble and involve othersOsimhen doesn't only play on the defender's shoulder, but his overall ability to get his teammates involved through the center is not the best. Average most of the time and how he is being used at Napoli maximizes his best skills, which is great. I just don't know if it goes best with what EtH is building at United.
If Bruno and Sancho/Antony play this positional fluid but disciplined game where they can provide good service and still score, then having players like Marcus and Osimhen finishing the chances created will cause problems.
But the well balanced CF like a fit Martial or Kane or Rooney type players, they can finish and provide service and link up...that's the player I see best for EtH and what he is building and that's unpredictability in attack. Marcus is more direct and final touch for goal, Bruno and Sancho are primary creators but can score. Antony progress the ball and keeps the width while winning the ball back with Bruno higher up the pitch. The CF can do everything at any time.
I’ll admit I know very little about the player from what I read he’s the kind of CF who plays on the edge of the last defender. That’s one thing that makes me wary. For the fee quoted I’d want a striker capable of holding the ball up well in congested spaces and linking play well which by all accounts isn’t part of his skill set.
Hey dude can we get goals + assist stats so we can see the overall ability of the strikers you have mentioned?Comparing Osimhen so far this season with Haaland's last four seasons (so including stats from the weaker German league as well as his stats so far in England), per 90 and without penalties.
Osimhen - 1.03 goals, 0.71 xG
Haaland 19/20 - 1.10 goals, 0.74 xG
Haaland 20/21 - 0.93 goals, 0.76 xG
Haaland 21/22 - 0.75 goals, 0.62 xG
Haaland 22/23 - 1.06 goals, 0.72 xG
So he's effectively having a Haaland-level goalscoring season. And while his previous two seasons weren't as good, they still stack up just fine compared to some other top strikers we might have an interest in.
Osimhen 20/21 - 0.57 goals, 0.61 xG
Osimhen 21/22 - 0.64 goals, 0.48 xG
Kane 19/20 - 0.56 goals, 0.38 xG
Kane 20/21 - 0.55 goals, 0.49 xG
Kane 21/22 - 0.36 goals, 0.43 xG
Kane 22/23 - 0.63 goals, 0.45 xG
Obviously Kane was performing in a tougher league across those seasons, but then he was also a lot further along in his development at 26-29 years old than Osimhen at 21-23.
And because people sometimes make the "Lukaku tore up Serie A as well" argument as a diss, a comparison of the two to highlight the difference.
Osimhen 20/21 - 0.57 goals, 0.61 xG
Osimhen 21/22 - 0.64 goals, 0.48 xG
Osimhen 22/23 - 1.03 goals, 0.71 xG
Lukaku 17/18 - 0.50 goals, 0.39
Lukaku 18/19 - 0.51 goals, 0.44
Lukaku 19/20 - 0.51 goals, 0.43
Lukaku 20/21 - 0.56 goals, 0.57
So whether for United or Inter, peak Lukaku's best season wasn't as good as the worst of Osimhen's three at Napoli thus far, let alone his best in which he is scoring at quite literally twice the rate.
In this case I don't think the numbers lie, this guy is a straightforward elite striker.
Osimhen doesn't only play on the defender's shoulder, but his overall ability to get his teammates involved through the center is not the best. Average most of the time and how he is being used at Napoli maximizes his best skills, which is great. I just don't know if it goes best with what EtH is building at United.
If Bruno and Sancho/Antony play this positional fluid but disciplined game where they can provide good service and still score, then having players like Marcus and Osimhen finishing the chances created will cause problems.
But the well balanced CF like a fit Martial or Kane or Rooney type players, they can finish and provide service and link up...that's the player I see best for EtH and what he is building and that's unpredictability in attack. Marcus is more direct and final touch for goal, Bruno and Sancho are primary creators but can score. Antony progress the ball and keeps the width while winning the ball back with Bruno higher up the pitch. The CF can do everything at any time.