First of all, Kane could be available. Just because a shit source says Levy won't sell Kane to a rival this summer does not mean we have to start looking at the likes of Marcus Thuram and Sesko to chase instead. And I agree, it is quite clear that Thuram has barely played as a striker because he is not a natural striker or a consistent goal scorer. But at the same time, he isn't exactly a great team player unless he plays left forward where we already have Rashford, Sancho and Garnacho, so please explain why we should go for him. Is it because we can get him on a free? That's not good enough imo.
As for Sesko, the hype surrounding him is weird. He hasn't shown anything at all for us to be interested in him. He can't even score goals in the Austrian League. Also, for £50m? So why shouldn't we just double that and get Osimhen?
When it comes to the bolded part, neither of these players have ever looked world beaters in Serie A with the exception of Immobile. It seems you only look at goals scored, and even then, Scamacca scored 16 goals in 36 matches played (25 in which he started). You should look at the player's ability before spouting out how shit the league is. I agree, though, it is a bad league with horrible teams in it, but Osimhen's abilities are evident and there is nothing that suggests he wouldn't make it in Premier League. I mean, have you seen us lately? We create a lot of chances every game, and even Weghorst could've had a few more goals if he had Osimhen's pace.