tenpoless
No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Break the bank for him.
Salah scored plenty in Italy and came here just fine. Why is Lukaku the reference we use?
Smalling is playing for Roma right now who was a good PL CB for a long time, and he's scoring against him no problem.
I'm amused how people still think that Lukaku's problem is his technique. In reality, his main problem is his movement as he tends to be too static. Technique might be partially his issue but If he doesn't have technique but has world class off ball movement, he would have been great in top club here. Cavani's technique and hold up play in his first season were the same level as Osimhen, but Cavani did well with us in his first season. Imagine Cavani with more pace and less injury prone, Osimhen will be fine. Cavani is also a Serie A striker.Salah is one of the most technical players of his generation. Shite all to do with strength.
I'm amused how people still think that Lukaku's problem is his technique. In reality, his main problem is his movement as he tends to be too static. Technique might be partially his issue but If he doesn't have technique but has world class off ball movement, he would have been great in top club here. Cavani's technique and hold up play in his first season were the same level as Osimhen, but Cavani did well with us in his first season. Imagine Cavani with more pace and less injury prone, Osimhen will be fine. Cavani is also a Serie A striker.
Both Lukaku and Osimhen are two different kind of strikers, Osimhen and Cavani are more similar than Osimhen with Lukaku. Lukaku doesn't like to move a lot, he prefers to stay closed with defenders by bullying them with his strength and power. Osimhen and Cavani like to move a lot and has good work rate, they prefer to create space, lose markers, and run behind defenders.
Lukaku's biggest problem is his ball control. He needs two touches to fully control the ball. That's not an issue when he's playing at a small team who relies heavily on counter attack football. However it becomes a concern at a club like United when opponents defend in numbers and there's not much room/time to act.
Anyone who follows my posts know that I follow and love the Serie A. I've seen some of the best players ever playing there and in my opinion the best team ever assembled played there as well. However we're not in the 80s and the 90s anymore. The Serie A is far weaker then the EPL and that on top of many 'intrinsic' flaws like its less physical and less intense. Its a league were the likes of Immobile, Abraham and Lookman can top the goalscoring charts. Take Scamacca as an example. He scored 16 goals last season. How is he doing with West Ham now?
I am not saying that we shouldn't take a punt if the opportunity arise but Osimhen is definitely not one of them. Napoli is a rich club and in terms of difficulty in dealing with the owner De Laurentiis makes Levy look like Woodward. On top of that they bought the guy for 70m euros which means that they would want at least double of that. Finally Napoli are playing the best football since a certain Diego Armando Maradona was playing for them. They are firing on all cylinders with Kvaratskhelia acting as a goal/assist machine as well. Can Osimhen replicate that in a more difficult and defensive league? I doubt it.
I have seen many times Cavani miss control when he was at United, yet he still performed in his first season here. Mainly because he has great off ball movement. The point is that Lukaku doesn't have both technique/ball control and off ball movement. Meaning Lukaku is too limited to outclass good defenders. If strikers have one of these, they can use it in one of their asset to outclass defenders. Osimhen has one of these, which his movement. Is Osimhen off ball movement poor?TY
If we are going to make comparison for this argument we should make comparison with similar type of strikers not just because they played in the same league. IMO it's lazy argument to make point that just because they are from Serie A meaning they are likely will have the same fate. Surely you want to consider why Scamacca fail at PL now?? Is Scamacca the same kind of striker as Osimhen?? Does Immobile know how to adapt in different country and league?? Will Osimhen have the same problem failing to adapt to different country and league after proven capable to perform in two different leagues like Ligue 1 and Serie A?? There has to be more reasons than just ''they play in Serie A''.
Lukaku's ball control is shocking and far worse then Cavani's. It takes him 2 touches to fully control a ball and between one touch and another the ball might move a metre away from him. That makes it easy for the opposition defence to defend against that especially once they learn his flaw.
Regarding your latter question its so difficult to analyse a Serie A player because the gap between the two leagues is so huge. We're talking of a league were the likes of Lookman, Immobile, Scamacca, Abraham and a 33 year old Arnautovic can score tons of goals in. What I know for sure is that Napoli will take us to the cleaners for him and at that price its simply not worth it. We're not talking of a Haaland level of player here let alone a Van Basten one which is the fee Napoli would ask for.
Its really funny because back in the 90s I used to have the very same argument but in reverse. Anyway, my point is this. The gap between the two leagues is ridiculously huge and the style of play is very different. Such transfer deal might work or it might not. Actually if you look at the track record as of late then most of the time it didn't work. That means that whoever moves from the Serie A to the EPL is going to be a huge gamble. Can you really gamble 120m-140m on a player? Cause that is what Napoli will be asking.
who plays high lines for us to make runs in behind? Also whats different as rashford to striker than osihmen except heading?I'm amused how people still think that Lukaku's problem is his technique. In reality, his main problem is his movement as he tends to be too static. Technique might be partially his issue but If he doesn't have technique but has world class off ball movement, he would have been great in top club here. Cavani's technique and hold up play in his first season were the same level as Osimhen, but Cavani did well with us in his first season. Imagine Cavani with more pace and less injury prone, Osimhen will be fine. Cavani is also a Serie A striker.
Both Lukaku and Osimhen are two different kind of strikers, Osimhen and Cavani are more similar than Osimhen with Lukaku. Lukaku doesn't like to move a lot, he prefers to stay closed with defenders by bullying them with his strength and power. Osimhen and Cavani like to move a lot and has good work rate, they prefer to create space, lose markers, and run behind defenders.
That's great and everything but i'm not sure why you're using the word strength?Salah is one of the most technical players of his generation. Shite all to do with strength.
the defending was awful today, literraly non existent. Hopefully he can get some goals in the Cl before we break the bank high.
The reason why you think his ball control is problem is because he doesn't have the movement meaning he prefers to receive the ball on his feet constantly with defenders behind on his back. With world class movement, player can have less touch on the ball because they prefer to run behind the defenders to create big space for the striker himself or open space for others and still score. Haaland another example of player who can have less touch on the ball and still score. There was time when he had only two or three touches in a match and scored a goal. Not every strikers need to have many touches.
From what I can see from Scamacca and Arnautovic, they are so different type of striker to Osimhen meaning Scamacca and Arnautovic failures shouldn't even be compared to what Osimhen might end up. I would rather focus on ''Have we seen a striker that similar to Osimhen type of striker capable to play in PL?'' I believe we have and I named Cavani.
Have you seen a striker that similar to Osimhen type of striker fails in PL? If you struggle to know what type of striker Osimhen is then I think it's unfair for you to judge him randomly.
ETH knows his stuff imo. If he wants Osimhen because he believes he's good enough to play in PL for his system.
Lukaku's biggest problem is his ball control. He needs two touches to fully control the ball. That's not an issue when he's playing at a small team who relies heavily on counter attack football. However it becomes a concern at a club like United when opponents defend in numbers and there's not much room/time to act.
I love these sort of posts.
By your algorithm, which leagues are the most suitable leagues to buy players from for PL teams? And show me how you have arrived at this conclusion including the same metrics in terms of strength of the leagues, competitiveness, quality of the defenders (or players in general depending on position).
There's no algorithm but what I see with my very eyes. Regarding your question, that goes way beyond the scope of my knowledge. However if I remember well Stephen Howson had tackled the issue few months back and if memory serves me right it was La Liga followed by the French league.
That’s interesting.
There is no league at a comparable standard to the PL, and even buying players from WITHIN the PL means little. You just have to do your due diligence regarding anyone you want to sign, and Serie A is more than a good enough level of professional football for a PL club to be able to make an assessment on a player.
I think he would. But it wouldn't be good value for us, considering the fee Levy would demand, Kane's age, and somewhat spotty injury record.Pointless to even think about going after Kane....he's not going to leave Spurs for United
He hasn‘t won anything at Tottenham.Kane's good value if we win shit with him. Simple as that.
Because it's Tottenham. Van persie won feck all with Arsenal.He hasn‘t won anything at Tottenham.
He hasn‘t won anything at Tottenham.
We can win more shit with three new upgrades rather than just Kane.Kane's good value if we win shit with him. Simple as that.
Not the point anyone made. The point that was made was kane isn't good value if he costs 80-100 mil. The counter point was that he is good value if when he signs, united go on and win shit. If united win the league title with Harry kane leading the line then it's obviously good value and a good signing.We can win more shit with three new upgrades rather than just Kane.
Good thing we have Ten Hag as manager and not Southgate or ConteOr England.
Nunez wishes he had HALF of Osihmen's composure and technique in the final third.Nigerian Darwin Nunez.
Not the point anyone made. The point that was made was kane isn't good value if he costs 80-100 mil. The counter point was that he is good value if when he signs, united go on and win shit. If united win the league title with Harry kane leading the line then it's obviously good value and a good signing.
If we sign kane £80-100mil and he bangs in the goals next season and we win the league, it's money well spent. It's simple as that. This talk of value is bollocks when you're talking about arguably the best striker in the league and one of the best in the world.What's the argument you are trying to make then? No one would give a feck about Kane costing 100m if we had a 600m budget but we don't. The entire hesitance to buying him for that price is that we aren't just a "striker away" from winning everything as a squad and shelling out a huge portion of our budget for a 30 year old that doesn't quite fit the profile in terms of running that we want is a big risk
If we sign kane £80-100mil and he bangs in the goals next season and we win the league, it's money well spent. It's simple as that. This talk of value is bollocks when you're talking about arguably the best striker in the league and one of the best in the world.