MattofManchester
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 10, 2018
- Messages
- 4,094
Was pretty poor today, but so was the entire defence.
How the feck did you come back to Maguire for this?This is ridiculous. I thought he should have cut off the second goal but have not seen in slow motion again. The first one there was nothing much he could do. He had other players closer to Firminio than him and he was right in trying to block his straight path to goal. Under pressure why the hell did Maguire kick it straight to the centre of the pitch. yes Cavani mis-controlled it but he should have kicked in a different direction and much further away.
Haven’t you learned by now? Every goal we concede is going to be dissected until every player on the team, including Lingard, will have been blamedHow the feck did you come back to Maguire for this?
On first viewing I didn't really blame him for the first goal, but watching it back you can see that Lindelof suddenly dropping back is the only reason Salah was onside. Our four defenders were all holding a good line until that moment and Salah would have run offside, but just as Firmino is about to make the pass Lindelof starts sprinting backwards and is 3 metres or so behind the others.
Second goal he's obviously trying to show the Liverpool player down the outside but he's just too far away from him.
On first viewing I didn't really blame him for the first goal, but watching it back you can see that Lindelof suddenly dropping back is the only reason Salah was onside. Our four defenders were all holding a good line until that moment and Salah would have run offside, but just as Firmino is about to make the pass Lindelof starts sprinting backwards and is 3 metres or so behind the others.
Second goal he's obviously trying to show the Liverpool player down the outside but he's just too far away from him.
Lindelof played Salah onside, blaming Shaw for that is ridiculous.I think its unfair to completely blame Lindleof for the first goal. Salah was Shaw's man so Shaw could have gotten to him.
I am not the biggest fan of Bailly or Lindelof but they have played better than I thought they could this season.
However, the problem when Bailly plays for me - when he is great, he absolutely shines as an amazing defender (so much so that people value him as our best CB according some posts). When he struggles though he can seem really out of it, like he is playing on a different wave length to everyone else. Those amazing tackles sometimes turn in to poor positioning from too much tackling mentality and being owned by a world class striker. Some wins may become draws and some draws may become losses.
Lindelof is the worse defender but he kind of plays with this cool & composed mind. He can be part of the defence that let's in a goal - but he kind of keeps that defensive line together alongside Maguire and the fullbacks to allow the rest of the attacking team to go and try win the match.
Bailly is the better natural defender but I'm not so sure we would be this high up in the league with Bailly in the team every week.
It reminds me a bit of Daley Blind & Smalling- Blind wasnt the best defender we had but it allowed us to defensively feel more composed than Smalling partnering with Jones or Rojo and any other CB he played with during that time.
The biggest issue is he hasn't got a clue what's going on around him.
What are he and Maguire doing? they have literally nobody around them for 10+ yards, the ONLY threat there is Salah. Lindelof should have moved across to Shaw a few yards to block the space off. It seems like he doesn't even know he's there and is just ball watching.
Instead he gets his positioning all wrong, ends up spinning around 360 degrees looking for the ball and gets nowhere near Salah. He ends up neither defending the space properly or the man.
Of course he should, in that situation he has nobody to mark, no runners going in behind and Firmino has dropped off and is the one passing the ball. He has 1 threat and that's Salah. Go and close the space down and that goal doesn't happen.No he shouldn't. Both CBs are in good positions there, if anything they are already a little too far apart. It's on Shaw to move tighter to his CB not Lindelof to move out. Shaw wasn't tight enough and compounded it by letting Salah get goal side and in front of him.
This is a good post. I agree with a lot of it, though I would also say that Bailly looks more comfortable after a run of games and those matches where he has been a bit all over the place have tended to be when he was not fully match sharp.
Super harsh criticism there I'm afraid. He was poor yesterday and he's only a good defender but to pick that goal as the low light is baffling. We're caught out because Cavani gives the ball away 35 years from our goal. To single out Lindelof for that goal is bizarre.There you go everyone. Lindelof's reaction and defending there
Look at his first step, backwards and then proceeds to give Firminho all the fecking time to play a pass.
Any defender's natural reaction is to step forward, close the space and try to affect the situatuon yet he's on his heels and backs into his own box. How much more retreating or 'smart positional' play does he want to show there? Be in line with Henderson?
He has ELITE reading of the game when it comes to choosing the safest option and not getting involved but I've having none of this mythical crap being bandied around that he's a really good defender because of it.
VVD was over twice Lindelof's fee so not really a comparison.
VVD was over twice Lindelof's fee so not really a comparison.
Bailly and Lindelof = Van DijkNot the same season. Maguire went to Leicester for £17m the season we bought Lindelof for £30m+.
You have by far the most replies in the Bailly thread and the majority of them are critical, much more so than your posts in Lindelof's thread (which you also dominate by a long way). Hard to ignore such a poster.Yea and who wants to start discussion about other posters? That seems a bit obsessive if something. Makes you think at least. Maybe it is better you focus on the players instead of me?
Super harsh criticism there I'm afraid. He was poor yesterday and he's only a good defender but to pick that goal as the low light is baffling. We're caught out because Cavani gives the ball away 35 years from our goal. To single out Lindelof for that goal is bizarre.
I don’t know what you want honestly? If you disagree with me, it is better you write that instead of this ridiculous attempt of trying to influence what I write. Do like everybody else, and and comment the players instead of other members of the forum. Thank you.You have by far the most replies in the Bailly thread and the majority of them are critical, much more so than your posts in Lindelof's thread (which you also dominate by a long way). Hard to ignore such a poster.
And I don't mind you defending Lindelof, he's a good defender and gets a lot of stick unnecessarily, and as your fellow country man you'll obviously be biased towards him. What does seem in poor taste is trying to bring Bailly down because of that bias.
So again I reiterate, I look forward to seeing you defend Bailly's mistakes with the vigour you do Lindelof's.
Be more objective.I don’t know what you want honestly? If you disagree with me, it is better you write that instead of this ridiculous attempt of trying to influence what I write. Do like everybody else, and and comment the players instead of other members of the forum. Thank you.
I don’t think Bailly has shown that he is at the same level as the Lindelof and Maguire. 3-4 good PL games are not enough for me. Ok?Be more objective.
On first viewing I didn't really blame him for the first goal, but watching it back you can see that Lindelof suddenly dropping back is the only reason Salah was onside. Our four defenders were all holding a good line until that moment and Salah would have run offside, but just as Firmino is about to make the pass Lindelof starts sprinting backwards and is 3 metres or so behind the others.
Second goal he's obviously trying to show the Liverpool player down the outside but he's just too far away from him.
You don't have to think that. All you need to do is be as critical of Lindelof as you are of Bailly, or consequently, defend Bailly with the same vigour you do Lindelof ( I prefer the latter personally, both are good defenders).I don’t think Bailly has shown that he is at the same level as the Lindelof and Maguire. 3-4 good PL games are not enough for me. Ok? Now please go stalk someone else.
Lindelof had a poor game, but I don't hate him. He's just a decent defender, decent but not good enough. The great United teams always had 2 top class CB's and that's what we should be aspiring to.
I don’t think it is your position to run around and correct us who write here. If you don’t like what I write, respond to that instead of trying to make me write something else than my own opinion.You don't have to think that. All you need to do is be as critical of Lindelof as you are of Bailly, or consequently, defend Bailly with the same vigour you do Lindelof.
Because otherwise, your posts look like that whole "Martial vs Rashford" thing where fans would bash one player to big up another.
Come on man. Firmino takes a micro touch and then instantly shuffles the ball across the box. Franco Baresi isn't stopping that goal from the Lindelof position. Incredibly harsh. The 1st goal was poor defending by Lindelof and he was poor tonight but this goal isn't on him.It's harsh if this was a single case but it's all too typical to Lindelof's approach of defending. Back off, 'stall' and hope nothing comes of it.
Look at how far back he is when Firminho receives the ball ffs. He's a good 5 yards away and he's already on his back foot retreating.
The great United team without any world class CB is back in the 50s/60s.Sorry but the great United teams generally had a great midfielder. Then generally 1 very good/ great centre back and a decent one alongside him. Clubs been around a lot longer than Vida & Rio.