Stonewall penalty once again denied.
Shocking from VAR. Something we are used with.
Shocking from VAR. Something we are used with.
VAR, Refs and Linesmen | General Discussion
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
Never a pen. Wasn't against Wolves and it isn't today. They made such a fuss when the one against Wolves wasn't given that you knew today's would be awarded.
What annoys me is there is never any long checks for incidents where we may have a penalty. It’s just decided so quickly.
That was a fecking handball that was given against us for fecks sake
A blatant penalty its absolutely incredible. Once again just days after a near identical one goes against us, we don't get one. This season has been just awful. Absolutely awful
I'm sorry, are you guys complaining over Onana trying to decapitate someone?
Meh. Examples are set against us. Won't see that given again for years.
I dislike that it should be a penalty. Red card for the gk rather than penalty would be fairer imo
The inconsistency is hilarious
Yep if Allison or Ederson had of done that at the start of the season a la Onana
Nothing would have been said
We need our club to do a Nottingham Forest statement. This is beyond joke.
I really need to know the number of pens given against us in the last 10 minutes of a game this season.
I think today was the 5th or 6th game in a row where this happens no?
I think today was the 5th or 6th game in a row where this happens no?
Not even a VAR check. Really inconsistent.
I didn’t disagree with any of the decisions. Onana clearly smashed him in the face.
Of course not. Scared sh*tless of giving us anything from VAR because the media will come after them
You're talking about Onana punching someone ? How is that not a pen ?
How different was that handball from Wan Bissaka's last week?
It also should have been a red card. Only saw 5 minutes of this game and the ref looked completely overwhelmed
Dunno, they didn't show a good replay of it
I thought Garnacho got caught, but I'll have to see it again. And let's be honest, they were always going to give the penalty for that Onana challenge after all the hoopla the last time around. The press have done a job on us.
The penalty against may well be stone wall but we won’t see another given for a long time. What’s he supposed to do…he’s allowed to use his hands. It’s the equivalent of a defender jumping for a header and a player beating him to the ball and clashing heads. It’s not a pen. Goalies lead with their hands quite obviously.
As for the handball….how many times are we going to be denied things given against us. It’s cost us as much as injuries and shite performances this season I’d say.
As for the handball….how many times are we going to be denied things given against us. It’s cost us as much as injuries and shite performances this season I’d say.
AWB had his arms wide to begin with and bought them in to try and avoid the handball. The one today, his hands didn’t move. I don’t think either should be pens.
Somebody with the skills please make a compilation video for this season. The amount of similar incidents you could put side by side with calls going against us is shocking. Awb last week penalty. No pen today. Both Chelsea penalties, no penalty garnacho. Romero handball, all the Emirates decisions, the elliott dive. It's just endless. The genuine rule of doubt seems to be to rule against United.
I don't have any complaints about those decisions. Can't cry about the AWB one being given then complain that one wasn't.
Onana needs to control himself.
Onana needs to control himself.
Because keepers are always judged very differently. It has simply never been a pen.
Poor yet again.
refs are just freestyling with the rule
I think the handball at least deserved a check from the referee in the monitor.
We're upset leave us alone.I'm sorry, are you guys complaining over Onana trying to decapitate someone?
But, yeah, it was a definite penalty.
Any videos of garnacho 2nd half incident? Looked like he might have been tripped but didnt see good replay
We have lost potentially 20-25 points with all those strange decisions.
We need club to make statement about how we are being treated. It is just pathetic.
A lot of people seem to think it's a definite penalty and yes he's wiped the striker out.
But the ball has been cleared and falling to our player.
It wasn't long ago players seemed to be able to get away with anything as long as the striker got their shot off. But here they weren't even getting one, or even denied one.
Why? Two different outcomes, similar incident. Are we not allow to point out inconsistencies?
His hands were down by his sides.
I don't think AWBs should have been a pen but his hands were out behind his back and while moving them back towards his body he also moved them towards the ball so it's not the same thing. That one was soft as feck but giving us a pen today would have been fairly outrageous.
Same with strikers getting shots off. I remember Ashley Cole absolutely 2 footing someone like Hernandez, but because he'd got the shot off it was deemed fine.
And the same incident with Grealish literally 24 hours before was fine. Hilarious really how obvious it is
United are refereed to different standards than any other team, there is no denying it.
I've seen them given in other competition and they should always have been given. It sucks that we are on the receiving end of this. It should never not be a pen when a keeper punches a player whilst being nowhere near the ball
All the penalty decisions were correct today.
With that logic no player could ever make a foul from kicking or tackling, since they're allowed to use their feet, right? What are they supposed to do? Not miss the ball and hit the opponent?!
Agreed, I have zero complaints.
All ire should be aimed towards our shocking team and manager... Anywhere what is simply misplaced and let's them off the hook