NYT saying there is a 75% of Jones winning.
Yeah that's really bizarre. Other than waiting for the Jones leaning counties to tabulate their votes, I wonder what the Times knows that we don't.
NYT saying there is a 75% of Jones winning.
Either way, this should have been 99.9% Jones with Moore and perhaps his horse voting MooreNYT saying there is a 75% of Jones winning.
So far, this doesn't look that good for Moore. Most of the democratic vote is still out there and his lead constantly between 4-5% with 40% of the overall vote in.
Didn't they do something similar with Hilary the election last year(I really can't remember). But it's very odd.Yeah that's really bizarre. Other than waiting for the Jones leaning counties to tabulate their votes, I wonder what the Times knows that we don't.
Probably shenanigans by Bannon's crew.
Didn't they do something similar with Hilary the election last year(I really can't remember). But it's very odd.
Didn't they do something similar with Hilary the election last year(I really can't remember). But it's very odd.
It's up to 90% now.Either way, this should have been 99.9% Jones with Moore and perhaps his horse voting Moore
Didn't they do something similar with Hilary the election last year(I really can't remember). But it's very odd.
Their algo is probably extrapolating potential outstanding Jones votes in Dem leaning counties. We should know more in the next 30 minutes.
Cheers.They simply extrpolate Jefferson and Mobile votes and they seem to be reasonably confident.
NY Times page now has Jones at 85% chance of winning.
Right now, our most likely estimates span Jones +18 to Moore +2.3.
https://www.nytimes.com/elections/results/alabama-senate-special-election-roy-moore-doug-jones
Only 40% or so from Jefferson and Madison, 3% in Mobile and Montgomery. Very low numbers...there is still hope.So far, this doesn't look that good for Moore. Most of the democratic vote is still out there and his lead constantly between 4-5% with 40% of the overall vote in.
Jesus didn't know it was that high. Oh Jones now talking a big hit now, down to 70%NYT had Hilary at about 80% until it became clear what was happening if I remember correctly.
Numbers from big cities tend to come late, that’s why there is still a chance for Jones.In before the failing NY Times and Fake News
Monroe went to Moore, which Jones needed to win by 8% by his benchmarks. Buttler als rerported only a narrow Jones winJesus didn't know it was that high. Oh Jones now talking a big hit now, down to 70%
Everything been said about this race but I'm completely depressed that people have actively gone out to vote for Moore. Really disgusting.Monroe went to Moore, which Jones needed to win by 8% by his benchmarks. Buttler als rerported only a narrow Jones win
69 nice
Don't get your hopes up peeps. That NYT model is crazy.
Not sure. Mobile is missing almost completely, 2/3rds of Jefferson is still out there. Turnout will decide this and the expectations of high black turnout is likely he reason for the NYT's prediction.It will take a small miracle or Jones to pull this off. He's down by 50k votes with about 67% of precincts reporting.