Dumat is actually a Russian propaganda bot but we can’t ban him because the Russians have dirt on Niall.
Last year's circumstances are not this year's. We both know that.
Dumat is actually a Russian propaganda bot but we can’t ban him because the Russians have dirt on Niall.
Last year's circumstances are not this year's. We both know that.
Yes. And what Ford is doing is, IMO, is devaluing what these victims have suffered through. Every woman who lies about rape and ruins the life of innocent people does that. I don't know if you've watched the Hunt, but it is a pretty good depiction about what happens to these men who are falsely accused of raping someone without any single shred of evidence, besides the word of the woman. It just ruins the whole thing. If a woman is raped, she should come out. Not 36 years later, not as a political tool and she better have some evidence for it beside her word.
If I remember correctly, Anthony Rapp has been speaking about it for years and only recently it caught up. Furthermore, Spacey himself shot himself in the foot when he semi-admitted it. Spacey also got shut down for PR reasons than anything else. And call be sceptical, but I doubt he's going to be out for very long now. Give it a couple of years and it will be swept under the rug
People where? Here? Let's be honest, the political threads here are full of liberals whose only care in the world is to go left, left and more left. You have your agenda and you will never listen to me, I'm at peace with that. But at the end of the day, facts are facts. You can't go around supporting someone who is accusing someone of raping her when she has virtually no evidence to support her.
I'm entirely reasonable here. I don't know why you're acting as if I'm saying some crazy shit. You people just live in your own imaginary world where your side is always right and never wrong, regardless if the facts slapped you right in the face, as it is now.
Yes. And what Ford is doing is, IMO, is devaluing what these victims have suffered through. Every woman who lies about rape and ruins the life of innocent people does that. I don't know if you've watched the Hunt, but it is a pretty good depiction about what happens to these men who are falsely accused of raping someone without any single shred of evidence, besides the word of the woman. It just ruins the whole thing. If a woman is raped, she should come out. Not 36 years later, not as a political tool and she better have some evidence for it beside her word.
He is supposed to be 23.
This process is a confirmation of Trump's agenda: the destruction of imperfect yet vital American political institutions and norms.
Never mind that this appointment is dividing the country like never before, and the nominee cast any appearance of serene stoicism to the side in his hearing yesterday, and that regardless of his innocence/guilt (which again, I'm flabbergasted at the amount of people who are certain of it one way or another), the cloud over him is too great to allow him into the Supreme Court... feck all that. Ram it in.
Your posts are almost entirely baseless accusations, incredible naivety and ridiculous irony.People where? Here? Let's be honest, the political threads here are full of liberals whose only care in the world is to go left, left and more left. You have your agenda and you will never listen to me, I'm at peace with that. But at the end of the day, facts are facts. You can't go around supporting someone who is accusing someone of raping her when she has virtually no evidence to support her.
I'm entirely reasonable here. I don't know why you're acting as if I'm saying some crazy shit. You people just live in your own imaginary world where your side is always right and never wrong, regardless if the facts slapped you right in the face, as it is now.
Every woman who lies about rape and ruins the life of innocent people does that.
Yes. And what Ford is doing is, IMO, is devaluing what these victims have suffered through. Every woman who lies about rape and ruins the life of innocent people does that. I don't know if you've watched the Hunt, but it is a pretty good depiction about what happens to these men who are falsely accused of raping someone without any single shred of evidence, besides the word of the woman. It just ruins the whole thing. If a woman is raped, she should come out. Not 36 years later, not as a political tool and she better have some evidence for it beside her word.
Mmm hmm.
Here's how it would have went down.
Police: "Raped? Where? At a party? Were you drinking? What where you wearing? Have you ever kissed boys before? Sorry, we can't press charges as you were asking for it. But you're welcome for the added shame we've just provided for your daddy's tax dollars"
Trump's own election was a pretty good sign that his agenda would be mostly implemented, especially with a GOP congress...so no big surprise here.
Yeah, let us talk about that one falsely accused man who suffers so much - not the thousands of women in comparison.
There is so many reasons why women do not come out - maybe you should read the many stories posted with the hashtag #whyIdidntreport
I started writing some nasty shit about your posts but deleted it, what's the point in engaging with you. You seem like a horrible person judging by you're opinion on a very severe and delicate problem in our society. I feel sorry for any female or understanding male that has to engage you on a daily basis. You seem to be oblivious to the meaning of credibility and by the sounds of it you enjoy wallowing in the alex jones style puddle of delusional shite. Good day to you.Last year's circumstances are not this year's. We both know that.
Yes. And what Ford is doing is, IMO, is devaluing what these victims have suffered through. Every woman who lies about rape and ruins the life of innocent people does that. I don't know if you've watched the Hunt, but it is a pretty good depiction about what happens to these men who are falsely accused of raping someone without any single shred of evidence, besides the word of the woman. It just ruins the whole thing. If a woman is raped, she should come out. Not 36 years later, not as a political tool and she better have some evidence for it beside her word.
If I remember correctly, Anthony Rapp has been speaking about it for years and only recently it caught up. Furthermore, Spacey himself shot himself in the foot when he semi-admitted it. Spacey also got shut down for PR reasons than anything else. And call be sceptical, but I doubt he's going to be out for very long now. Give it a couple of years and it will be swept under the rug
People where? Here? Let's be honest, the political threads here are full of liberals whose only care in the world is to go left, left and more left. You have your agenda and you will never listen to me, I'm at peace with that. But at the end of the day, facts are facts. You can't go around supporting someone who is accusing someone of raping her when she has virtually no evidence to support her.
I'm entirely reasonable here. I don't know why you're acting as if I'm saying some crazy shit. You people just live in your own imaginary world where your side is always right and never wrong, regardless if the facts slapped you right in the face, as it is now.
They supposedly ask questions like that for top secret security clearance over here.Why would someone even ask about that in a job interview?
«Erhm, so yeah, do you like horsies?» Wtf.
Do you work for her Dad?
Suka blyat, I've been caught.Dumat is actually a Russian propaganda bot but we can’t ban him because the Russians have dirt on Niall.
Let's not play confused here. The midterms are coming, we both know that. We both know that it is absolutely vital for the Dems to block another Republican candidate to be in the Supreme Court (dare I say, the position is more important than the President one). Trump's appointment of Kavanaugh is a big blow to them, if it passes (Which it will). What gang rape was he present in? I don't get it. There's no evidence of what she is saying. Why do you believe her?Its not about last year's circumstances. Trump was President then and things were pretty divided then as well. The difference is that Gorsuch didn't have a rape accusation hanging over his head as he went through his interviews. Kavanaugh is being accused of sexual assault and being present during a gang rape. Spot the difference ?
She has no witnesses, she comes out 36 years later in the perfect time to disrupt Kavanaugh's appointment, she's obviously a Democrat, she has even donated to the party. She has nothing to support her theory. It's simply her word and her word is worth shit. In a just society, she would be considered a crazy person in need of her meds and not given the spotlight with every fecking politician, Republican or Democrat, kissing her ass for no reason (oh, she has no evidence, but I'm sure she was raped by someone else somewhere else, as some Republicans on the panel have already said)On what basis have you come to the conclusion that she's lying?
The burden of proof lies in the accuser, not accused.Ahhhh, I see, you have evidence Ford lied? Brilliant. Let's see it.
What more does the FBI is going to do, besides delay his appointment, that this panel is unable to do?Your posts are almost entirely baseless accusations, incredible naivety and ridiculous irony.
In 'our imaginary world' you don't just reach a conclusion that matches your political bias and stick with it, regardless of how much of a prick it makes us look. We ask that someone with authority investigates and gathers the facts. Apparently that simple notion of old fashioned transparency, fairness and justice is a ploy of the evil Leftists rather than a cornerstone of a modern democratic society.
Evidence? Did you actually think that bit through before you typed?Last year's circumstances are not this year's. We both know that.
Yes. And what Ford is doing is, IMO, is devaluing what these victims have suffered through. Every woman who lies about rape and ruins the life of innocent people does that. I don't know if you've watched the Hunt, but it is a pretty good depiction about what happens to these men who are falsely accused of raping someone without any single shred of evidence, besides the word of the woman. It just ruins the whole thing. If a woman is raped, she should come out. Not 36 years later, not as a political tool and she better have some evidence for it beside her word.
People where? Here? Let's be honest, the political threads here are full of liberals whose only care in the world is to go left, left and more left. You have your agenda and you will never listen to me, I'm at peace with that. But at the end of the day, facts are facts. You can't go around supporting someone who is accusing someone of raping her when she has virtually no evidence to support her.
Oh god Niall! What did you do in Moscow after we beat Chelsea in 08?Dumat is actually a Russian propaganda bot but we can’t ban him because the Russians have dirt on Niall.
Do you work for her Dad?
You can't subpoena people to testify without a majority.The idea that it's all about asking for an FBI investigation is complete BS. The senate have the same power to ask for testimony as the FBI. The FBI will ask questions to witnesses, these are sworn oaths under a 302. Members of the Senate have the power to get people to testify and they don't need majority help. They can ask for the testimony of witnesses right now.
The FBI investigation is just about delaying things until after the election.
The burden of proof lies in the accuser, not accused.
She has no witnesses, she comes out 36 years later in the perfect time to disrupt Kavanaugh's appointment, she's obviously a Democrat, she has even donated to the party. She has nothing to support her theory. It's simply her word and her word is worth shit. In a just society, she would be considered a crazy person in need of her meds and not given the spotlight with every fecking politician, Republican or Democrat, kissing her ass for no reason (oh, she has no evidence, but I'm sure she was raped by someone else somewhere else, as some Republicans on the panel have already said)
If the Democrats retake the Senate, it should be made law that the investigative powers of the Senate should not be held bound to partisan politics. A valid issue should be thoroughly investigated even if a majority of committee members vote against said investigation because of their party.
But who decides it’s a valid issue? Another committee?If the Democrats retake the Senate, it should be made law that the investigative powers of the Senate should not be held bound to partisan politics. A valid issue should be thoroughly investigated even if a majority of committee members vote against said investigation because of their party.
You're speaking too much sense, and thinking too highly of the Dems.