US Politics

Dianne Feintein raped me 36 years ago. Disprove my point? This is basically what the Dems are doing. I'm sorry, but you have to be incredibly naive to believe someone's words. There is not a single shred of evidence to support her claims.

Its a job interview. If you went into a job interview for a lifetime position and someone claimed you raped them, then you likely wouldn't get the job.
 
Her testimony is just her word and words are not evidence. Why did she not press charges at the time, but she suddenly decides to do this?

words are evidence and are used to convict people all the time. she didnt come forward before because rape apologists like you would react the way you are reacting now. she suddenly decided when her attacker was up for a position that would allow him to decide what millions of women can do with their own bodies
 
Her testimony is just her word and words are not evidence. Why did she not press charges at the time, but she suddenly decides to do this?

FFS, really. You don't know why a teenage girl didn't press charges against rich kid prep school boys who raped her at a party in 1983?
 
congrats to all the rubes who fawned over jeff flake because he said trump was uncouth. i hope its now clear what we are up against and that there can be no compromise with republicans.
i know. and all republican politicians are evil. their policies are evil. they support things that make life worse for so many of their fellow citizens. jeff flake is evil.
Too right.
 
When you look at these Republicans, you have to question the districts that send them to Washington.
 
Its a job interview. If you went into a job interview for a lifetime position and someone claimed you raped them, then you likely wouldn't get the job.

As an example - my oldest friend was going for a big job in the police. I had to be part of his vetting process as an outsider (since I've known him a long time).

A lot of the questions they asked me were personal (and there's a reason for it). If I had said anything dodgy whatsoever, he wouldn't have progressed.

I don't know why conservatives are pretending like they've never heard of this scenario before. Nobody wants a rapey judge in the highest court of the land.
 
Another day, another reminder why I've tried to ignore US politics. Just depressing.
 
And all this talk about midterms when the Republicans even refused to hold hearings when Obama nominated Garland with 9 whole months till the elections.
But this guy, who has been accused by 3 different women of sexual misconduct, nominated by a President who is under investigation for colluding with a foreign power, for possible obstruction of justice and much more with the elections just weeks away, must be confirmed asap without any investigation. Yeah, makes sense
 
Because this is an obvious ploy by the Democrats to use the FBI investigation to delay his appointment until the midterms are over and the Democrats can block a Republican Supreme Judge. This is pretty much confirmed when all the Democrats did during the questioning is ask him about requesting an FBI investigation. At the end of the day, there is not a single shred of evidence to support any of this, besides her word. It seems that these days, as long as you're a woman, you can claim that someone raped you back 50 years ago and that'll take you for granted.
So you investigate it thoroughly You don’t turn round with any criminal accusation and say “oh there’s not a shred of evidence to support this” and leave it at that. That’s why investigations are done the world over. To try and reach the truth.
 
Her testimony is just her word and words are not evidence. Why did she not press charges at the time, but she suddenly decides to do this?
Because there was a policy back then that what happen in the house stayed out of the courthouse. It would have never have come to trial 36 years ago.

No one on here is saying that he is definitely guilty. They are saying that she is credible and that they believe there should be an FBI investigation.
 
Her testimony is just her word and words are not evidence. Why did she not press charges at the time, but she suddenly decides to do this?
Testimony is evidence.

Source: am lawyer.

To the second point. There are several reasons why victims of sexual assault don't tell anyone immediately. That is not me saying "x definitely happened" but asking that question as though it is definitive is moronic.
 
When you look at these Republicans, you have to question the districts that send them to Washington.

People dispute it, especially since Trump was elected, but they're just filled with backward, desperate people. Especially on social issues.

People like to think there's a bit more nuance to it because they don't like to think half their country could be so deplorable.
 
FFS, really. You don't know why a teenage girl didn't press charges against rich kid prep school boys who raped her at a party in 1983?

She was just a young girl.

This has scarred her for life. But she chose to be strong and made a life for herself.

What is this country coming to.

Sending rapists to the SC.

next will be pedophiles....from the Family Values party.
 
Because this is an obvious ploy by the Democrats to use the FBI investigation to delay his appointment until the midterms are over and the Democrats can block a Republican Supreme Judge. This is pretty much confirmed when all the Democrats did during the questioning is ask him about requesting an FBI investigation. At the end of the day, there is not a single shred of evidence to support any of this, besides her word. It seems that these days, as long as you're a woman, you can claim that someone raped you back 50 years ago and that'll take you for granted.
Not surprised to see you arguing this point...
 
She was just a young girl.

This has scarred her for life. But she chose to be strong and made a life for herself.

What is this country coming to.

Sending rapists to the SC.

next will be pedophiles....from the Family Values party.
They backed Roy Moore through his campaign.
 
People dispute it, especially since Trump was elected, but they're just filled with backward, desperate people. Especially on social issues.

People like to think there's a bit more nuance to it because they don't like to think half their country could be so deplorable.
I think half the UK is deplorable and backward and our politicians aren't half as bad as these Republicans. These guys are proper poison.
 
The worst thing about people who know nothing is that they don't know enough to realise how much they don't know, and stay quiet on topics as a result.
 
Its a job interview. If you went into a job interview for a lifetime position and someone claimed you raped them, then you likely wouldn't get the job.

Hell, most places I've worked, if you were found to have lied in the job interview, you're getting sacked... if you were hired at all. Even if you lied about something as innocuous as boofing cocaine
 
What kind of evidence are you expecting?
If the Republicans wanted proof, they should have made the FBI investigate the allegation. This guy is about to get a lifetime appointment to the highest court of the land, where he will decide upon matters that influence the lives of millions. The stakes are too high for an allegation like this to be ignored
Evidence to collaborate what she is saying besides her word and the words of her husband.

The Dem talking right now has proposed a 7 day limit. The Thomas investigation took just 3 days.

Not enough evidence means he's off the hook and gets the job.
Why did these same Dems witheld the accusations for more than 40 days?

When the woman wants the FBI to investigate and the guy doesn't, that should tell you something.
For obvious reasons, I might add. If someone accuses you of you raping someone 30 years ago, what'll you do? Ask the police to investigate you?

FFS, really. You don't know why a teenage girl didn't press charges against rich kid prep school boys who raped her at a party in 1983?
Yes, why? He's far more powerful now than she is. The difference has only grown larger with time, not smaller. And please, she was a rich kid herself. Attending a private school and born into Washington's suburbs. Certainly not from a poor family.

Its a job interview. If you went into a job interview for a lifetime position and someone claimed you raped them, then you likely wouldn't get the job.
And he was there, answering questions. If someone claimed I raped them, I doubt the job interviewer would have cared at all, unless she had evidence. In that case, sure. But Dr. Ford doesn't.

words are evidence and are used to convict people all the time. she didnt come forward before because rape apologists like you would react the way you are reacting now. she suddenly decided when her attacker was up for a position that would allow him to decide what millions of women can do with their own bodies

Words are never evidence unless by a witness. And all the witnesses collaborated Kavanaugh's version. The only one who can collaborate her word is her herself.
 
I’m still just laughing at the sheer absurdity of the defense that a woman would come out against the old-moneyed white male establishment and ruin her life in a futile effort to derail a judicial appointment just for shits and giggles.
 
Hell, most places I've worked, if you were found to have lied in the job interview, you're getting sacked... if you were hired at all. Even if you lied about something as innocuous as boofing cocaine

My mate went for a job interview at GCHQ and they ask all sorts of shit about drugs and bestiality porn and whatever. I told him before not to lie so when it came to it he told them about all the drugs he did and they had no issues at all. Apparently they just don’t like it if you talk bollocks to them.
 
She was just a young girl.

This has scarred her for life. But she chose to be strong and made a life for herself.

What is this country coming to.

Sending rapists to the SC.

next will be pedophiles....from the Family Values party.

Mmm hmm.

Here's how it would have went down.

Police: "Raped? Where? At a party? Were you drinking? What where you wearing? Have you ever kissed boys before? Sorry, we can't press charges as you were asking for it. But you're welcome for the added shame we've just provided for your daddy's tax dollars"
 
I look at American politics and wonder how the F**k can the yanks be a world leader.

What a horrible crew on both sides.
 
I’m still just laughing at the sheer absurdity of the defense that a woman would come out against the old-moneyed white male establishment and ruin her life in a futile effort to derail a judicial appointment just for shits and giggles.
She's a anti-Trump, has attended "Women's march" and a donator to the Democrats. Wow. I wonder why she is willing to "ruin" her life.