Unpopular Opinions Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
Could be that it had to do with maybe injury?

Dunno. Van Gaal has said he's responded well to the issue so as long as it's not an ongoing thing I don't think it necessarily matters...but he has to prove himself on the pitch, in a United shirt. Not by mouthing off to newspaper accounts on twitter or posting topless selfies of himself pulling stupid faces.

Tbh, I really do wish none of our players had discovered the internet exists, for varying reasons.
 
Shaw is an outstanding defender given his age. Like, insanely good at defending. That's what counts most.

Fergie signed Evra "to attack", so I don't think that's necessarily 100% true for a fullback either. For a team like United it's more often an attacking position with defensive responsibility.
 
Fergie signed Evra "to attack", so I don't think that's necessarily 100% true for a fullback either. For a team like United it's more often an attacking position with defensive responsibility.

Defenders are required to defend, first and foremost. I don't think that will ever change. Evra's defending was good at United during the good times. We've all seen it at its worst and we should be thankful we no longer need to put up with his constant shitty defending of the latter years.

Shaw's dribbling and link up play needs work, but he is a good crosser, powerful and pacey. Like I said, though, his defending is where it's at. Seldom are young defenders that developed in that respect, hence he's so highly rated.
 
Fergie signed Evra "to attack", so I don't think that's necessarily 100% true for a fullback either. For a team like United it's more often an attacking position with defensive responsibility.

On the other hand, I'd have thought someone like Irwin's main attribute was how unbelievably and consistently secure and reliable he was during his time here. You don't really get that same security from an Evra type player.
 
Fergie signed Evra "to attack", so I don't think that's necessarily 100% true for a fullback either. For a team like United it's more often an attacking position with defensive responsibility.
We have Rafael on the other side to be the attacking full back, while Shaw can be the more defensive one. We don't want a Barca situation where both full backs are poor at defending. Their brilliant team from 09-11 had Abidal doing the defending for the most part and Alves doing the attacking. Same with Brown and Evra in 08.
 
Defenders are required to defend, first and foremost. I don't think that will ever change. Evra's defending was good at United during the good times. We've all seen it at its worst and we should be thankful we no longer need to put up with his constant shitty defending of the latter years.

Shaw's dribbling and link up play needs work, but he is a good crosser, powerful and pacey. Like I said, though, his defending is where it's at. Seldom are young defenders that developed in that respect, hence he's so highly rated.

It's been a long time since being able to defend has been enough to be a succesful fullback for a top club. It's about being able to do both things now. Provide width and support to the attack (as a minimum), whilst also being able to defend when on the back foot, and be fast and fit enough to do both when required.

Evra was at his best when he'd stretch teams and basically terrorise his side of the pitch all game long. He didn't disappear defensively like in his last year or two, but he was always rash and last ditch/maniacle rather than solid. His speed bailed him out a lot.

Nothing to say Shaw can't be as succesful just because his defensive side is his strong suit. There's examples of players who have done exactly this, and I agree with the basic point...when you get a fullback who is ONLY interested in attacking you end up with something akin to Glen Johnson, but if United are going to carry on being succesful the emphasis will often be on attack (e.g. the QPR game). Every top fullback of recent years has been able to do both, one way or another.

What I want is less stories about lack of fitness, less pratting around on the internet. It doesn't create the greatest vibe when you're yet to even pull on the shirt in a competitive game.
 
Same, I dont think he adds much apart from goals, in build up play I'd rather have Reus, he is like 5 years younger, costs less and I think our team is more balanced then in attack. Reus, di Maria, Falcao, Reus are complement to eachother.
I'd like to have Reus too ahead of Ronaldo. But almost whole Europe will be after him if he decides to leave. We'll have a chance, but of course could lose out. If we lose out, then I'd like Ronaldo. The others like Muniain (or Depay who a lot here rate higher than Muniain) aren't the finished product but would also be OK! But we DO need another skillful winger with pace.
 
I've not seen anything from Luke Shaw in his time at Southampton to convince me he'll be a good signing, and don't understand how it's even possible to value a left back at £30m when they're not even 20 years old.

I've also not been impressed by the lack of fitness reports, stupid posey photos, and being mouthy on twitter.

Only Van Gaal's recent positive comments on him are keeping me from being seriously sceptical.

Completely agree with you regarding Shaw's fee. I really don't get where it came from, I wonder perhaps if David Luiz's ludicrous transfer fee during the same window made Southampton think "f**k it, lets ask for 30m" and for whatever reason we obliged.

I do think he's a talent but f**k me, 30m for a left back completely unproven at the highest levels? Mental.

I'm not opposed to us splashing the cash either. I personally think Di Maria will prove to be worth every penny. But 30m for Shaw? Nah, I'm not having that.
 
I think overpaying for top British talent is a very reasonable thing for us to do. Guess that's an unpopular opinion?
 
well. dunno if thats unpopular or controversal at all? Like almost all other fans, people tend to overrate their own player. Its not only Danny. There are a couple of other examples where the caf has fairly exclusive views, that nobody outside Manchester would ever share.

Jonny Evans.

Has there ever been a non-United fan who rates him at all?

That said, I don't really rate him either. He should have gone on to be a lot better than he is.
 
I think overpaying for top British talent is a very reasonable thing for us to do. Guess that's an unpopular opinion?

I agree with this also but there's a limit, surely?

I mean, paying 20m for Shaw while we payed 13m for Blind and 16m for Rojo would've still been over-paying for him really.

But f**king hell, 30m? It's more than we payed for RvP a few windows back!
 
I agree with this also but there's a limit, surely?

I mean, paying 20m for Shaw while we payed 13m for Blind and 16m for Rojo would've still been over-paying for him really.

But f**king hell, 30m? It's more than we payed for RvP a few windows back!

Southampton got very good prices for all of the players they sold this summer (see £25m for Lallana, for example). Shaw was young, already an England international, arguably the best LB in the league last year, very marketable and attracting interest from Chelsea. Given all of that he was bound to be particularly overpiced. Add in the fact that everyone knew we were a) desperate for signings and b) willing to spend big money....

I can certainly see why we ended up paying so much. I mean it's not like we got any of Di Maria, Herrera or Rojo for bargain prices either tbf.
 
Moyes is a competent manager (as proven by his time at Everton). The problem was that the squad at United never gave him a chance. As an example, our defence last season was worse than Everton's under Moyes, despite being composed of superior players. That can only be because the individuals never believed in him.
 
Moyes is a competent manager (as proven by his time at Everton). The problem was that the squad at United never gave him a chance. As an example, our defence last season was worse that Everton's under Moyes, despite being composed of superior players. That can only be because the individuals never believed in him.

Moyes is indeed a competent manager and will likely do well at his next club if he chooses well.

Unfortunately "competence" should never have been enough to get him this job.

Even if the problem was that the squad failed to give him a chance then it's still ultimately his fault for not being able to handle that problem by regaining his authority. You need to be able to do that as a manager here and he failed.

All of which assumes that the players were wrong to be underwhelmed by his appointment in the first place, when in reality it was a far from inspiring choice.
 
Moyes is a competent manager (as proven by his time at Everton). The problem was that the squad at United never gave him a chance. As an example, our defence last season was worse than Everton's under Moyes, despite being composed of superior players. That can only be because the individuals never believed in him.
He's a mid table manager, out of his depth at a top club. Every manager IMO has their way of playing and their level, moyes just couldn't cut it at the top when he was required to play fast and attacking football. He's always been defensive and it's much easier to make a more structured defensive unit when the whole team is more defensive, rather then playing attacking football. He just didn't know what to do, and generally being just competent isn't enough to be the manager of one of the biggest clubs in the world.
 
All of which assumes that the players were wrong to be underwhelmed by his appointment in the first place, when in reality it was a far from inspiring choice.
True, but a bit depressing really.

It's like wanting to buy a designer top rather than an equally good one from M&S, purely so that you can feel happy about their being a fancy label under the collar. If the players had worked with the manager rather than prejudging him for not being fancy and foreign, we might have got top 4.
 
Jonny Evans.

Has there ever been a non-United fan who rates him at all?

That said, I don't really rate him either. He should have gone on to be a lot better than he is.
yeah, he is one of them and to be incredibly unpopular:
Pogba, Smalling, Jones, DDG, Herrera, Blind, Evans, Welbeck. All these would get rated completely different if they would play for Arsenal/Pool.
 
He's a mid table manager, out of his depth at a top club. Every manager IMO has their way of playing and their level, moyes just couldn't cut it at the top when he was required to play fast and attacking football. He's always been defensive and it's much easier to make a more structured defensive unit when the whole team is more defensive, rather then playing attacking football. He just didn't know what to do, and generally being just competent isn't enough to be the manager of one of the biggest clubs in the world.
A midtable manager can get a title winning squad into a top 4 position.

Our biggest problem last season was having a disorganised defence. If only that much had been sorted out according to Moyse's strategy, we'd be in the CL right now.
 
True, but a bit depressing really.

It's like wanting to buy a designer top rather than an equally good one from M&S, purely so that you can feel happy about their being a fancy label under the collar. If the players had worked with the manager rather than prejudging him for not being fancy and foreign, we might have got top 4.
It's more like replacing your favourite designer suit with a pyjama top just because it was from the same store.
 
A midtable manager can get a title winning squad into a top 4 position.

Our biggest problem last season was having a disorganised defence. If only that much had been sorted out according to Moyse's strategy, we'd be in the CL right now.
The reason we weren't in the champions league was simply because we just didn't score enough, or make chances enough to win games. The defence wasn't great but it wasn't awful to the extent that it cost us always. It was us not making any chances and never scoring goals which meant even conceding 1 goal usually meant dropping points. Moyes didn't know what to do to make the offence work and in trying to get it, he made the defence unorganized as well.
 
Jonny Evans.

Has there ever been a non-United fan who rates him at all?

That said, I don't really rate him either. He should have gone on to be a lot better than he is.
Tbf yes. He had great games against Spain ages ago and Portugal so their fans rated him at least after those games. It's when someone plays well against your team and you don't watch the player often you think he is good and if he played badly you automatically think he is bad if you haven't seen other good games of him.

Having said that I still rate him and hopefully LvG gets the moronic mistakes he at times makes out of his game!
 
yeah, he is one of them and to be incredibly unpopular:
Pogba, Smalling, Jones, DDG, Herrera, Blind, Evans, Welbeck. All these would get rated completely different if they would play for Arsenal/Pool.

Pogba and De Gea are both excellent players. Smalling is really good too. Herrera is a good player. The others are all quite average.
 
The reason we weren't in the champions league was simply because we just didn't score enough, or make chances enough to win games. The defence wasn't great but it wasn't awful to the extent that it cost us always. It was us not making any chances and never scoring goals which meant even conceding 1 goal usually meant dropping points. Moyes didn't know what to do to make the offence work and in trying to get it, he made the defence unorganized as well.
We kept conceding the first goal and then finding it difficult to break teams down. The two worked hand in hand, but without the shaky defence putting us on the back foot every game, our attackers would have found it easier.
 
yeah, he is one of them and to be incredibly unpopular:
Pogba, Smalling, Jones, DDG, Herrera, Blind, Evans, Welbeck. All these would get rated completely different if they would play for Arsenal/Pool.

Definitely not De Gea. Any Liverpool fans I know accept that he's a top quality player. If they can recognize it then I'm sure we would too if he was playing for a rival.
 
Moyes is a good coach and a decent man, who deserves a job in PL.
 
Definitely not De Gea. Any Liverpool fans I know accept that he's a top quality player. If they can recognize it then I'm sure we would too if he was playing for a rival.

everybody recognises, that he is top quality. Thats undisputed, but I often read that he is eventually already the best keeper in the world or at least top2/3. Thats an overstatement. Pogba is also a great player but he is nowhere near worldclass yet and has a long way to go. The caf thinks that he is the next messi(as).
 
Moyes is a competent manager (as proven by his time at Everton). The problem was that the squad at United never gave him a chance. As an example, our defence last season was worse than Everton's under Moyes, despite being composed of superior players. That can only be because the individuals never believed in him.
How was ours composed of better players?

Baines is/was better than Evra.
Coleman is/was Rafael's equal.
And Distin and Jagielka have been a solid partnership for years - which is what it's largely about, more so than individual ability.
Meanwhile Rio was on the decline, none of the younger guys were near his peak level, and half of them struggled to stay fit for long enough to even form a partnership.

Plus you say "worse than Everton's under Moyes" as if they were bad. But they'd actually been solid under Moyes for a good few years.
And it doesn't follow that a defence of 'better' players will make a more solid defence. The balance of Everton's was better, and they seemed better drilled by Moyes than the defence Sir Alex left us.

I think if there was one area were Moyes was certain to improve this squad - it was in defence. I'd have had lots of faith in whoever he chose to bring in/sell in terms of defence. Strikers, on the other hand, I'd have been worried.

As much as Moyes had his faults, I agree that a lot of the problems last season came down to a lack of quality.
Assuming he had good money to spend, he should have strengthened our mid-table midfield - and I guess you could argue that he should have pressed hard for Thiago early on even if he didn't have much money, but now, with all these new players, you really see how mediocre so many of those players were.

And I agree that he was let down. I'm sure a few of them liked how they'd had things for years, didn't react well to his methods, looked at their medals and thought "Whatever happens, he'll be gone before I am" and choose to not even meet him halfway.
 
Last edited:
Between Shaw and Rafael, I think the former is the better player.
I couldn't disagree with that more. The difference in the team when Rafael is fit and playing and when he isn't, is huge. Shaw whilst very talented and having a very good first season at Southampton; hasn't played a competitive game for us yet.
 
It's been a long time since being able to defend has been enough to be a succesful fullback for a top club. It's about being able to do both things now. Provide width and support to the attack (as a minimum), whilst also being able to defend when on the back foot, and be fast and fit enough to do both when required.

Evra was at his best when he'd stretch teams and basically terrorise his side of the pitch all game long. He didn't disappear defensively like in his last year or two, but he was always rash and last ditch/maniacle rather than solid. His speed bailed him out a lot.

Nothing to say Shaw can't be as succesful just because his defensive side is his strong suit. There's examples of players who have done exactly this, and I agree with the basic point...when you get a fullback who is ONLY interested in attacking you end up with something akin to Glen Johnson, but if United are going to carry on being succesful the emphasis will often be on attack (e.g. the QPR game). Every top fullback of recent years has been able to do both, one way or another.

What I want is less stories about lack of fitness, less pratting around on the internet. It doesn't create the greatest vibe when you're yet to even pull on the shirt in a competitive game.

But Shaw does attack well. He may not get the numbers - yet - but Evra himself is a reasonable example that demonstrates it isn't all about statistics. I actually quite like the idea of Rafael on one side and Shaw on the other. Shaw is that bit more understated in an attacking sense but can make up for that with his composure. It could make for a nice balance.

Of course, the fee is madness but that is British football. I don't mind us going out and spending top dollar on British talent as it's something that's served us well for decades. The fitness story was one remark, and as for the interent, I'm not all that bothered. He's 19, has mates and as long as it isn't affecting his football then it doesn't concern us.
 
People have forgotten how good Shaw has/had been for Southampton in the past two years. He's definitely one of the greatest U21 defenders around. He was a little overwhelmed to begin with in preseason but grew into it. This nonsense about his fitness and being fat will be washed away when he finally starts playing. He'll cement a spot in the squad for many, many years to come.
 
Defenders are required to defend, first and foremost. I don't think that will ever change. Evra's defending was good at United during the good times. We've all seen it at its worst and we should be thankful we no longer need to put up with his constant shitty defending of the latter years.

Shaw's dribbling and link up play needs work, but he is a good crosser, powerful and pacey. Like I said, though, his defending is where it's at. Seldom are young defenders that developed in that respect, hence he's so highly rated.


Ughh, outdated and anti-philosophical. Go back to the 90s.
 
Baines is not that great. Evra and Cashley are still better than him by some distance. No amount of free kicks and beatles hair do changes that.

Evra and Cole were better and much better but not been for the last 3 years.
 
Ughh, outdated and anti-philosophical. Go back to the 90s.

Ay, they're meant to let attackers run past them at every given opportunity at the expense of goals.

Let's be serious, it isn't a black or white debate. Attacking full backs are incredibly important and we all know it's now a prerequisite to play the position, but even now, the best teams are looking for guys that defend, and that is always the first thought.

Philip Lahm's reputation didn't come about as a result of his attacking play, nor did Ashley Cole's. It was part of the package, but for my money they're the two best full backs of their generation and their defensive work is the main reason why.
 
Ay, they're meant to let attackers run past them at every given opportunity at the expense of goals.

Let's be serious, it isn't a black or white debate. Attacking full backs are incredibly important and we all know it's now a prerequisite to play the position, but even now, the best teams are looking for guys that defend, and that is always the first thought.

Philip Lahm's reputation didn't come about as a result of his attacking play, nor did Ashley Cole's. It was part of the package, but for my money they're the two best full backs of their generation and their defensive work is the main reason why.

A DM could always cover an attacking fullback, either by dropping between the CBs(in the vogue) or by moving in the space the fullback left(Barry at Everton, and old school defending).

It is axiomatic that scoring goals is more important than conceding. (For you can always outscore you opponent but never win w/o scoring).

A good fullback can help stretch the pitch and overload attacking areas: two crucial strategies that teams build their attacking play around.

If defending was so important for fullbacks we'd see a lot of CBs that could double up as FBs, instead most FBs these days are suited to play as wingers.
 
Baines is not that great. Evra and Cashley are still better than him by some distance. No amount of free kicks and beatles hair do changes that.
Still better? Not sure about that - they haven't been for a while.

Not that Baines is all that great himself.
 
Baines is not that great. Evra and Cashley are still better than him by some distance. No amount of free kicks and beatles hair do changes that.

He's been better than both of them for the past three seasons (though last year he wasn't great either).
 
Van Gaal is seriously underestimating this league. Yesterday our setup was way too offensive. I also don't like the idea of playing 3 strikers, because it means a lot of support is needed from Di Maria, Herrera and fullbacks and in the end we end up with Blind and a couple of poor CBs at the back.

We need to be more careful, we won't outscore the opposition every time.
 
I'm not sure if this thread is for non-united related unpopular opinions but I really don't see the problem with players not celebrating a goal against one of their former clubs. Lukaku and Sturridge in particular seem to have come in for a lot of stick for doing this. Just seems like a harmless way of acknowledging the support the player received from his former club's fans and staff when the team he currently plays for are already overjoyed because he's just scored.
 
I'm not sure if this thread is for non-united related unpopular opinions but I really don't see the problem with players not celebrating a goal against one of their former clubs. Lukaku and Sturridge in particular seem to have come in for a lot of stick for doing this. Just seems like a harmless way of acknowledging the support the player received from his former club's fans and staff when the team he currently plays for are already overjoyed because he's just scored.
When players like Lampard did it, its okay, but Lukaku against West Brom was ridiculous. He was there for one year on loan, hardly enough time to build up a bond with the club and it's fans. It annoys me to see it, and it's happening more and more these days.

Holohan, I think it was, was the worst when he didn't celebrate against Villa last season because he nearly signed for them. Madness.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.