Did you see us go 3-0 up in the cup against 10 City players and then get played off the park and scrape through 3-2. I don't recall smashing City in the last 5 years or so. Even the wins were only by a goal.
I wasn't talking about the league, I was talking about the FA cup in 2012. Rooney header for 1-0, then Kompany got sent off. We went 3-0 up, and then second half their 10 men battered us.Nah, we hammered them in the 3-2 win (league). It was only after Young had a goal inexplicably ruled out that City gained momentum. Before that, we were all over them.
Lack of confidence isn't the problem, it's the result of the problem. Lack of proper organisation is the problem.
I wasn't talking about the league, I was talking about the FA cup in 2012. Rooney header for 1-0, then Kompany got sent off. We went 3-0 up, and then second half their 10 men battered us.
I don't call winning by a single goal a smashing. Since 2009 we have never won by more than 1 goal. However, we have been on the end of some serious beatings in the same period.You said, "I don't recall smashing City in the last 5 years or so." I'm telling you we did.
You said, "I don't recall smashing City in the last 5 years or so." I'm telling you we did.
Agree with most of this, I would argue that the 150M has been spent well. The mistakes that have been made seem to be coming from the original squad players (Smalling and Rooney send offs, Rafael/Jones positioning vs WBA and so on). I can't think of a purchase that has not grown into their position. Since the end of the transfer window, we haven't done bad or brilliant in performances, the points total is disappointing. Then again, relative to our competitors it is more of a missed opportunity.Definitely below-par as of now, I don't see how anyone could argue otherwise actually.
The positives are we are showing encouraging signs in terms of our attacking play. I don't go along with the notion that we have looked excellent or dangerous in attack however. We look decent and there is quite clearly a distinct improvement in our offensive game and midfield play than under Moyes, but with an outlay of close to £150M on an assortment of quality across numerous positions that is to be expected. I would expect the kind of improvement we've seen under any manager in charge of our of Premier League rivals truth be told, so it's nothing to shout about.
Whereas our attacking play, perhaps doesn't reflect our true position in the table, our results reflect very modestly on our position however. Thirteen points from ten games and still in the top of the table is hugely fortunate and illustrates just how inconsistent nearly every side ranging from fourth to seventeenth has been. Especially, given our fixture list, it is actually a joke that we've accumulated so few points.
All that points to a disappointing start from van Gaal, but I still remain positive that he can turn things around and I still believe he is the right man for the club. Hopefully we will start to see a LvG side really starting to form and take shape come the new year.
You've a strange definition of smashing a team. We won that with almost the very last kick of the game. City had 53% possession, 11 shots on target vs 3 from us and 8 corners to 2.
Yeah, I was never convinced that less football would definitely translate into better performances. We've seen it before under Fergie when early cup exits mean less frequent games and we seem to lack momentum and fluency. At the end of the day, slotting a few goals against crap European teams is a confidence boost that can lift the team and help fringe players convince the manager that they deserve a shot. The evolution of the team is painfully slow with only one game a week to try things out.
Its weird isnt it. For me the conclusion to draw is to take everything with a pinch of salt.
Conventional wisdom says a settled team is good. United's experience is perhaps that it is demotivating for certain players (both those struggling to get a game and those who feel their position is safe.)
Conventional wisdom says being able to focus on the league is an advantage - and explains Liverpool last year. United's experience this year is that it has prevented us from gaining any momentum.
I still think our light fixture schedule can be an advantage once we get going. Maybe if we'd played more games early on we'd have our players getting used to each other a bit quicker, but once they get to that point we'll see the benefits of more rest between games and less injuries. The contrast with the our competitors who are playing in the CL will also be more noticeable in the back end of the season when fatigue starts to catch up with them while our team are safely snuggled up at home playing on their PS4s (while Giggs shags their WAGs upstairs).
Not really dominant. City was controling the game and we scored against the run of play. And then we did again which made City go full in attack.We should have gone 3-0 up. After that, yes, the game turned a bit. Before that moment, we were clearly dominant.
Not really dominant. City was controling the game and we scored against the run of play. And then we did again which made City go full in attack.
Still, the decision to rule out Young's goal was stupid and I agree that if it had stand we would have had a comfortable victory. Anyway, it cannot b said that we smashed them considering that we scored on the last minute to get the win, and also City could have won the game (which might have changed the entire course of the season). It was nowhere near the smashing(s) they did to us last year, or the humiliation on 2011.
I'm not going to dispute the disappointing start or the below par points total, those are facts but to sensationally throw around the £150m figure is a bit disingenuous. I think everyone will agree that the purchases of Shaw, Herrera and Blind weren't us actually strengthening but those are the signings that should have been made last season if we had not fecked up two transfer windows. Then you look at Rojo in for Vidic/Ferdinand then the only strengthening we have done is Di Maria and an on loan Falcao. It's a huge figure that will be thrown around to sink Van Gaal but the fact of the matter is he did the job of three windows in half a window.Definitely below-par as of now, I don't see how anyone could argue otherwise actually.
The positives are we are showing encouraging signs in terms of our attacking play. I don't go along with the notion that we have looked excellent or dangerous in attack however. We look decent and there is quite clearly a distinct improvement in our offensive game and midfield play than under Moyes, but with an outlay of close to £150M on an assortment of quality across numerous positions that is to be expected. I would expect the kind of improvement we've seen under any manager in charge of our of Premier League rivals truth be told, so it's nothing to shout about.
Whereas our attacking play, perhaps doesn't reflect our true position in the table, our results reflect very modestly on our position however. Thirteen points from ten games and still in the top of the table is hugely fortunate and illustrates just how inconsistent nearly every side ranging from fourth to seventeenth has been. Especially, given our fixture list, it is actually a joke that we've accumulated so few points.
All that points to a disappointing start from van Gaal, but I still remain positive that he can turn things around and I still believe he is the right man for the club. Hopefully we will start to see a LvG side really starting to form and take shape come the new year.
Let's see where we are after the Liverpool game, eh? If we go on a good run now everything will look a lot different come Xmas.
I'm not going to dispute the disappointing start or the below par points total, those are facts but to sensationally throw around the £150m figure is a bit disingenuous. I think everyone will agree that the purchases of Shaw, Herrera and Blind weren't us actually strengthening but those are the signings that should have been made last season if we had not fecked up two transfer windows. Then you look at Rojo in for Vidic/Ferdinand then the only strengthening we have done is Di Maria and an on loan Falcao. It's a huge figure that will be thrown around to sink Van Gaal but the fact of the matter is he did the job of three windows in half a window.
Turning to our performances it is common knowledge that you build from the back but anyone walking in from two years of international management, after half of pre-season had gone would have accepted the commonly held perception that Smalling, Evans and Jones were ready to take over, particularly Evans. No one, save for some of us who watch from a distance would have expected them to breakdown like that. That oversight and an ill fated experiment has brought us where we are. We have made the most injury inspired substitutions and short ourselves on the foot countless times, a situation Iam sure an experienced operator like him will look to remedy at the first opportunity.
He seems to do absolutely nothing during a game to affect it. All the work can't be done on the training ground an if he can't see tht there are problems with our 'patient' build up then he's going to have problems. The tempo in our game never seems to change.