sglowrider
Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
I wonder if Gill & Fergie are tempted to make a couple of choice phone calls...
I know he's made a mockery of the club from the moment he became CEO.
"Manchester United is a team of George Clooneys"
"I'm flying back to Manchester to complete transfer business"
Complete and utter imbecile who is out of his depth. Unless you're someone who believes signing the Official Noodle Partner of Manchester United in Eastern Asia TM is something to be proud of, Woodward has done absolute feck all to talk about.
His idiocy has done nothing but make us look incompetent at an incredibly important time for this club.
I know he's made a mockery of the club from the moment he became CEO.
"Manchester United is a team of George Clooneys"
"I'm flying back to Manchester to complete transfer business"
Complete and utter imbecile who is out of his depth. Unless you're someone who believes signing the Official Noodle Partner of Manchester United in Eastern Asia TM is something to be proud of, Woodward has done absolute feck all to talk about.
His idiocy has done nothing but make us look incompetent at an incredibly important time for this club.
I'm perfectly relaxed, and No I don't think he would, he's no better than Cleverley and not worth close to the £23M he'd cost.
Wise words. We are very strong in other areas, with several players who will (in my humble opinion) take further steps and others who should (I realistically hope) get back on track compared to their efforts last season. The middle of the park is the most obvious weakness we have, and in one sense it makes it all the easier to deal with: Get a couple of players in, decent players, competent people - and we will have improved our options considerably. We can go for the real killer signing next summer. Outplaying Munich in the middle was never much of an option in Moyes' first season anyway. As long as we get some depth in (of reasonable quality, that goes without saying) we'll be in a good position to challenge for the league - and that is by far the most important thing here and now.
Weird comparison as they are 2 very different players who'd have different roles for us. Fellaini would provide a solid middle core alongside Carrick to allow the front 4 to focus on the attack. Overkill for most of our league games but that's besides the point. Fellaini would finally provide us adequate cover for Carrick though and that's something our squad desperately needs as we're fecked if he gets injured. Specially in Europe, a middle 2 of Carrick and Fellaini would give us much needed steel.
Cleverley on the other hand, I dont need to explain as am sure you can see how different he is to Fellaini.
He's not nearly good enough to be cover for Carrick and what are we going to do with Cleverley in the 90% of games where don't need two CM's who sit deep? It's only worth minimizing Cleverley for a real class player, otherwise we might as well just start most games with Carrick and Clev/Ando and when we need an extra clogger in there every once in a while we can use Jones.
He's not nearly good enough to be cover for Carrick and what are we going to do with Cleverley in the 90% of games where don't need two CM's who sit deep? It's only worth minimizing Cleverley for a real class player, otherwise we might as well just start most games with Carrick and Clev/Ando and when we need an extra clogger in there every once in a while we can use Jones.
Fellaini isnt good enough to be cover for Carrick? Wow.
With the number of games we play, no one will be minimized if we add Fellaini to what we have. We arent just short on quality, but numbers too. Fellaini's much more than a clogger too, a lot of you will be surprised if he does actually come here. Not a top class CM by any means but he's criminally underrated here by quite a few.
In a God-forbid scenario where Carrick gets long-term injured or just goes completely off the boil Jones isn't nearly good enough as a replacement at the moment. You may not rate Fellaini very highly but he is a defensive midfielder by trade, used to the role and competent enough to have played it for an upper table PL team. He isn't a "clogger". That's far too harsh.
Fellaini would presumably have no illusions about being brought in as an instant starter and star player: He would provide competition for Cleverley and Ando. If they step up and leave him behind in the dust, fine - no, excellent, and he'd get games as cover/rest for Carrick regardless.
I'm not saying Fellini is the only player in the world who could fill such a role, so if Moyes can find someone else, better and/or cheaper, that's fine by me. But Fellaini would improve our options and he looks like a getable target. How much he'd improve our starting XI as a partner for Carrick may be discussed, but I wouldn't say Cleverley is at a level presently where he would be a dead-on starter if we brought in the likes of Fellaini.
By cover I'm talking about if Carrick is out for 6 months, not filling in on a Saturday against West Ham before a CL Tuesday.
If we spunk £23M on him how are Clev and Anderson not going to be minimized? Carrick and Fellaini would start the bulk of games and he's simply not worth the fee or the hindrance to Cleverley. If we can't get real class then we should just use Carrick, Clev, Ando, Jones and Fletcher when he returns in January, there's always next summer instead of lumbering ourselves with an expensive and average CM just to have another body, if that's all we are after then McCarthy would be a hell of a lot cheaper and is about the same level..
If Fellaini were to come in at the fee of £23M he'll be expecting to start, we don't buy subs at that price. He'll go straight in and Clev will be left picking up minutes here and there and hoping Fellaini fecks up so he can get in.
If all we are looking for is a mid level CM who can cover Carrick and add an extra body to the options then McCarthy is far less expensive, is younger, has a higher ceiling and would be satisfied with squad rotation.
That sentence is an oxymoron.I'd imagine Fellaini would improve the squad considerably, although as has been stated, the £23m fee would be about 7m too much.
Well, you cant plan for a player to be out for 6 months. We cant have 2 top players for every position just because one might get injured long term.
Ando's injured half the season, in any case, he hasnt done enough to warrant not signing a player because of him. Fletch's time as a player for United is over, as much as I hate it. He's been out for too long. Jones is a CB and I hate to see him play in CM. Isnt good enough.
That leaves us with Carrick, Clev and a perenially injured Ando. With the number of games we play, that's too few. We need another player in there. If we get Fellaini, him and Clev can rotate with Carrick according to the opposition. It'l also allow us to rest Carrick, something we simply cannot do atm.
I havent seen enough of Mccarthy to comment on him but i dont know how someone can argue that we have enough numbers in CM tbh. We cant just wait another year as you're suggesting as there's no guarantee that we'l get the top player we want. If we could get 2 players to sign pre contracts, great, I'd wait. But it doesnt work that way as we've seen this summer.
Fine, let's buy McCarthy then - I don't mind that at all. We will probably have to pay a decent amount for him too, though - that's the business these days, not least when you're buying domestically.
If Moyes has learned anything from Fergie, he'll rotate a fair bit. I wouldn't worry about Cleverley - he'll get his chances, and if he has what it takes, he'll grab these chances and establish himself as a first choice midfielder. That would be grand - but it isn't a certainty from where I'm sitting.
I'm saying we have enough numbers if we are looking at Carrick, Clev, Ando, Jones, Giggs and we can't add true quality to ease that burden. To me spending £23M on such an average player whose best football has came playing up front is just a complete waste, it's desperation buying.
So we don't buy this summer but keep money and space for next summer, we might not win the league but we'll still get top 4, long term I think that is the way to look at it because with Fellaini we aren't talking about a cheap stop gap buy, we are talking about an investment of substantial money on a player who simply isn't worth it and wont solve our issues.
That sentence is an oxymoron.
That means a player worth 16m would better our midfield? midfield needs work but it isn't that bad!
Fellaini is easily worth 23m. Although I hate to draw comparisons to other players and their transfer fees as it's unfair, didn't ando cost us just shy of 20m? Didn't Milner go for 27m?
I know, I know, different scenarios etc. But 23m for a proven Premier league midfielder who can pay as dm, cm or am and had two extremely good seasons is not over paying. I'm genuinely surprised other teams have not been in for him at that price, particularly spurs Chelsea and arsenal
Jones and Giggs arent options in CM. One is a fantastic prospect at CB, the other past it. Unless we reach a desperate situation, neither should play in CM. That leaves us with 3 players for 2 positions, 2 of which cannot even play the holding role. 1 of them is a perma crock too. How is that enough options?
Fellaini isnt a desperation purchase but our CM situation is close to desperation anyways.
Lastly, our target must always be the league title and we must have the resources needed for it. We cannot think that the squad we have is good enough for top 4 so let it be. Moreover, you're underrating Fellaini. Not top drawer but he'l solve quite a few of our problems. Cover for Carrick and a porous CM being 2 of them.
Indeed which is why If we got him for that I'd consider it a 'good' deal. This is where I think we are lucky that Chelsea and is owner are obsessed with the barca philosophy of small agile spanish/brazillian guys to go for someone with grit. Part of me thinks same for spurs, but then again they went for dembele who isn't as skilful as fellaini imo.He wouldn't go for 23m if the likes of Spurs or Arsenal were interested. We'd be getting the inflated big club fee at that price.
Wigan are quoting suitors that the starting price is 20m and that they won't be taking any less than that. This of course is a starting point for negotiations, but to think that simply because he's in the championship that he can be easily picked up is a fallacy.We wont get him cheap of course but I doubt he'd cost more than £12M, Wigan are now in the championship so that should make it easier to acquire him.
I'm not worried about Cleverley, if we could get true quality I'd be fine with him fighting for a place because that is the nature of being at this club, however having to scrap for a place with a player no better than you who will only get the starts ahead of you due to the money he costs just seems pointless to me.
Jones may not be a world beater or a week in and week out option at CM but he has proven he can do a job when called on, as for Giggs, I am thinking we kept him on as player because he is expected to play and therefore fill in at CM for us from time to time.
I don't think I am underestimating Fellaini, I've seen him play plenty of times, he is very average and wont make us any more likely to win the League and certainly wont help us progress any further in the CL. He's a barrel scraping buy just to have the numbers in my view, like I said if bodies are all we are after then McCarthy is a better option.
Wigan are quoting suitors that the starting price is 20m and that they won't be taking any less than that. This of course is a starting point for negotiations, but to think that simply because he's in the championship that he can be easily picked up is a fallacy.
We know that Luiz Gustavo is surplus to Pep's requirements, so perhaps we can go for him instead of the reported Fellaini interest. Bild reports he prefers "EPL" over Wolfsburg and Inter. He's just a damn good player and perfect for partnering Carrick - not as back-up. Solid two in CM, proven in Champions League, and then Moyes can do whatever he wants up front given the talent we have there.
I don't think buying Fellaini is barrel-scraping but why not try for better alternatives?
Is Felliani the poor man's Yaya Toure?
They used him as a sheer DM, mainly - ain't that so? That's where he played when I saw him last season, anyway. Regardless - that means he'll be able to do what Fellaini can: Partner Carrick in a solid two behind the attackers OR cover for Carrick.
Sign him up, Moysey.
Pro Fellaini, I'd add - as Varun suggested too - that he comes with an added bonus of sorts: In the right sort of match we could use his attacking skills with good effect. The man is capable of scoring, both inside and outside the box, and his aerial potential is something we could definitely use in those "injury-time free kick/corner for the winner" situations.
Sign 'em both up, Moysey - and forget about Leighton, unless we can really get that unlikely sounding bargain package the Guardian mentioned.
Chesterlestreet: I'd be disappointed if we do no show interest in Gustavo. Sure, we have gone for two superb midfielders from Barca, neither of which happened. But Gustavo is a fine player, ticks what we need, has Champions League experience, plays for Brazil, and a fee is unlikely to be extortionate.
feck, am I missing something???
Is it me or is it a bit strange there doesnt seem to be any more 'Great' midfielders for us to buy that would help us significantly in ECL and possibly available??
There was Fab...possibly Modric but cant see that happening this year. Thats it??
Shame.Gündogan and Vidal are in that class, I guess - but neither seem possible targets. Other than that I can't think of anyone who could be classified as an immediately great signing.
Oh, and I'd add De Rossi myself - I think he would improve us significantly, even though he's obviously older than the others mentioned. But, again, doesn't seem possible.
Jones may not be a world beater or a week in and week out option at CM but he has proven he can do a job when called on, as for Giggs, I am thinking we kept him on as player because he is expected to play and therefore fill in at CM for us from time to time.
I don't think I am underestimating Fellaini, I've seen him play plenty of times, he is very average and wont make us any more likely to win the League and certainly wont help us progress any further in the CL. He's a barrel scraping buy just to have the numbers in my view, like I said if bodies are all we are after then McCarthy is a better option.
Shame.
And it just shows how difficult it is for Moyes/Woodward.
I'm confused as to why we weren't happy to put the same amount of money for Modric as Madrid were. Perhaps Spurs wouldn't sell to us.
The irony is that this year would/should be our best chance to buy a top class midfielder. For the first time in god knows how long the likes of Barca, Madrid and Bayern are so full with Midfielders that we wouldnt have their competition.
If memory serves Levy wasn't keen on selling him to either us or Chelsea - and the price was probably too high as well. We were in for him, though.
Yes, it does seem like an ideal time to snatch up a quality midfielder, but we're new to this whole "buy an established, bloody good midfielder" lark: It wasn't really Fergie's game! We'll see, though. I have every hope Moyes will get in someone who will improve our options. And next summer...well, the likes of Gündogan might prove easier to land. If he is for sale, we should be in with a chance - there aren't that many places he could realistically go.
Hi, I'm Real Madrid, I'll buy everything.
Don't forget that Bayern now has Pep in charge... therefore they'll need 10 midfielders on the pitch. Equally theres a lot of talk that Gundogan will go to Barca as Thiago's replacement.
Don't forget that Bayern now has Pep in charge... therefore they'll need 10 midfielders on the pitch. Equally theres a lot of talk that Gundogan will go to Barca as Thiago's replacement.