Sky1981
Fending off the urge
The revisionism is strong here
Are Kane and Son really there for the long run? Can they really accept another 3 years of 'low' wages while Jose rebuilds a back 4 and GK and they understand that their talents would be valued any top club. Lose Kane or Son (the most likely) then they are screwed. One question do you think Spurs win the league in the next 3 years? It could happen but the likelihood is no and Kane will only have so much loyalty before leaving to a club who suit his ability. Can you really imagine the best striker in the world (which for me he is) staying at a club that doesn't challenge?
So Poch is a better manager in today’s football, yet Jose has won more in today’s football and finished higher in the league with an inferior first team?
Not to mention Poch will have to sacrifice his pay off to join this season.
Jose spent about 400m at United in his 2 and a half years here. Pretty sure if Poch had £400m and played in the Europa League he’d have a good chance of winning a trophy.
Poch’s job at Spurs is much more impressive than Jose taking United to a Europa and Carabao Cup win. The season we finished second the title race was over in December we was about 20 points off the top, second or fourth meant absolutely nothing.
When Jose left United many was saying he’s done, I half expected him to do 12 months in China his reputation was rock bottom. Even 6 months ago imagine wanting Mourinho over Poch.....feels like I’m in a parallel dimension where Jose stint at United and Chelsea didn’t exist. Weird.
Why is everything about money? Did Poch have a good enough squad to win something, the answer is quite clearly yes. He got to 3 semi finals and a final and everytime cane up short. I loved the guy but he clearly has something left to learn if he is to win and win regularly.
I have my reservations about Jose of course but even in Uniteds worse PL spell ever he won more than us in outback best spell ever. Even at his worst spell as Chelsea boss he won the league.
Why is everything about money? Did Poch have a good enough squad to win something, the answer is quite clearly yes. He got to 3 semi finals and a final and everytime cane up short. I loved the guy but he clearly has something left to learn if he is to win and win regularly.
I have my reservations about Jose of course but even in Uniteds worse PL spell ever he won more than us in outback best spell ever. Even at his worst spell as Chelsea boss he won the league.
When Jose was Utd manager:
United fans:
Jose is better than Poch because he has won more
Spurs fans:
Haha enjoy your mickey mouse cups while we have a modern progressive manager who won't sacrifice long term progress for short term gains
United fans:
Jose still won more with an inferior squad
Spurs fans:
Would rather watch our team produce great football, positive atmosphere and climb up the ladder without spending a lot. Onwards and upwards!
And when Jose is spurs manager:
Poch will be next manager.
Well then why wouldn't he give it to your best manager ever. Was Levy sabotaging Poch so? You honestly need to replace Lloris (old), Verthongen (old), Alderweirald (contract), Aurier (shite), Eriksen (contract) Rose (contract). Who do have to replace them when you have to consider that Winks, Alli, Moura, Lamela, Sisokko and Davies who aren't good enough to play for a title winning team. If Levy gave huge money to Jose would you not be pissed that he refused to give it to Poch? Any real reason that you believe he would suddenly fund such a big rebuild? Also surely Kane (who I don't doubt loves the club but has to want the trophies his stature deserves) and Son might think of leaving in the near future too.
Edit: not good enough to start but can be subs. Then you still need 7 starting players assuming you manage to hold onto Kane and Son.
Jose spent about 400m at United in his 2 and a half years here. Pretty sure if Poch had £400m and played in the Europa League he’d have a good chance of winning a trophy.
Poch’s job at Spurs is much more impressive than Jose taking United to a Europa and Carabao Cup win. The season we finished second the title race was over in December we was about 20 points off the top, second or fourth meant absolutely nothing.
When Jose left United many was saying he’s done, I half expected him to do 12 months in China his reputation was rock bottom. Even 6 months ago imagine wanting Mourinho over Poch.....feels like I’m in a parallel dimension where Jose stint at United and Chelsea didn’t exist. Weird.
Get Rangnick as a DOF and Rose as a coach.
Yep, this would be a very sensible course of action — pair an astute Director of Football with a Head Coach he gets along with wrt. ideology and interpretation of football (on the basis of their Red Bull careers) so there are minimal fireworks or power-struggles. Overmars and Ten Hag could be an alternative to Rangnick and Rose/Nagelsmann, for similar reasons — individually competent, and also get along with each other (in fact Overmars has appointed Ten Hag as Head Coach twice: at Go Ahead Eagles, and Ajax).Get Rangnick as a DOF and Rose as a coach.
Disagree on Nagelsmann at least. He looks to have the full package. Still very young but his work at Hoffenheim was very impressive, especially that early in his career.Even though I some reservations about him I still think Pochettino is the best pick of the available managers out there. I wouldn't want Allegri at the club and though the likes of Rose/Nagelsmann are popular choices and promising young managers, a job of this magnitude might be too much for them at this stage of their careers.
This, it isn´t the manager it´s the working environment. We could get stardust to sprinkle on Pep and get him here he wouldn´t win anything under this management.
Yes 100%.He would do better than Ole though
I am an admirer of Nagelsmann and I agree with pretty much everything in youir post. That said, he is still very young and has only been a manager for 4 years now. What he has done in that time is impressive but that does not mean he is ready for a huge job like ours, the pressure, the expectations, and all the other things that come with managing such a club might be a lot for someone with his level of experience. I rate him but I still think Poch's knowledge of the league and his greater manegerial experience gives him an edge for me. Furthermore, Poch already has experience being at a reasonably big club so moving on to a very big club feels like a more natural progression than making the big step up from Hoffenheim/Leipzig to United.Disagree on Nagelsmann at least. He looks to have the full package. Still very young but his work at Hoffenheim was very impressive, especially that early in his career.
He has build himself as one of the best young managers and this year so far the expectations he has set himself was very high, considering how competitive the BL is. Of course the demise of Bayern takes some part, but his team plays very entertaining football, bounced back from a bad run in October and is doing well on three fronts.
He also has a clear plan on the pitch and also plan B when things doesn't work out. All in all he's a quality young manager with bright future, however I'm not sure he's available at the time.
Yeah, agree on that account of course. Either way I can't see him leaving the current project just yet. It's a good place to be at the current stage of his career. Maybe Rose will be more attainable in the Summer.I am an admirer of Nagelsmann and I agree with pretty much everything in youir post. That said, he is still very young and has only been a manager for 4 years now. What he has done in that time is impressive but that does not mean he is ready for a huge job like ours, the pressure, the expectations, and all the other things that come with managing such a club might be a lot for someone with his level of experience. I rate him but I still think Poch's knowledge of the league and his greater manegerial experience gives him an edge for me. Furthermore, Poch already has experience being at a reasonably big club so moving on to a very big club feels like a more natural progression than making the big step up from Hoffenheim/Leipzig to United.
One issue with Pochettino, is that his appointment would delay a much needed rethink of the administrative department. Practically none of the elite Champions League teams operate without a Director of Football or Sporting Director or Technical Director of some sort these days, yet United have been reluctant to employ one for who knows what reason — and once he consolidated enough power at Tottenham, Pochettino vetoed the appointment of a buffer between him and the higher ups (you can bet your bottom dollar that the same will happen at United)...Rodgers and Poch seems to be the best options we have now and after that Allegri.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...tell-mauricio-pochettino-would-not-get-level/Mauricio Pochettino has vetoed Tottenham Hotspurs’ proposal to appoint a new sporting director with the manager eager to retain a significant influence over transfers. The club are understood to have assembled a shortlist of potential candidates to replace the former head of recruitment, Paul Mitchell, but have abandoned the process after talks between Pochettino and Daniel Levy, the chairman. Many of Mitchell’s functions have been taken by the chief scout Steve Hitchen, who reports to the club’s football committee of Pochettino, Levy and the academy manager John McDermott.
I think problem is Woodward is reluctant to hire DoF or someone who can do that role with different title. If we go by his UWS interview, he is absolutely convinced the model we have is working and they have no intention to change it. If that's the case then Poch might be our best bet.One issue with Pochettino, is that his appointment would delay a much needed rethink of the administrative department. Practically none of the elite Champions League teams operate without a Director of Football or Sporting Director or Technical Director of some sort these days, yet United have been reluctant to employ one for who knows what reason — and once he consolidated enough power at Tottenham, Pochettino vetoed the appointment of a buffer between him and the higher ups (you can bet your bottom dollar that the same will happen at United)...Rodgers and Poch seems to be the best options we have now and after that Allegri.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...tell-mauricio-pochettino-would-not-get-level/Mauricio Pochettino has vetoed Tottenham Hotspurs’ proposal to appoint a new sporting director with the manager eager to retain a significant influence over transfers. The club are understood to have assembled a shortlist of potential candidates to replace the former head of recruitment, Paul Mitchell, but have abandoned the process after talks between Pochettino and Daniel Levy, the chairman. Many of Mitchell’s functions have been taken by the chief scout Steve Hitchen, who reports to the club’s football committee of Pochettino, Levy and the academy manager John McDermott.
While he is a good coach, Pochettino wants to be an old school manager and exercise overwhelming influence, even though he doesn't have the most proven record in the transfer market — and that could be an explosive combination with our post-Fergie dealings in an effort to rebuild the squad. We'll essentially be putting all our eggs in the basket of one man while hoping and praying that he works his magic, for the umpteenth time — instead of engineering interwoven but distinct segments to delineate the myriad responsibilities, like we should.
For what its worth, Pochettino could hit the ground running and prove to be a massive success over time — so all of this might be needless fretting, but I'd be much more at ease with the combination of a high-caliber DoF to define our football model (like Rangnick or Overmars) + a Head Coach to train that model (like Nagelsmann/Rose or Ten Hag). A bit less proven than Pochettino maybe, and totally unproven in the English league — but that would give us a more sustainable long-term blueprint where once the structures are in place, you can basically replace head-coaches (which is a reality in post-modern football) without creating needless turmoil, which is how most big clubs operate and plan these days. Even though I like Pochettino, you get a sense that we need to cast a wide net to enact fundamental reform and indulge in some outside-the-box thinking, instead of just homing in on the convenient and seemingly obvious choice. All IMO, of course.
Yeah, you're right — sometimes my brain wanders while thinking of theoretical solutions and I fail to consider that even though we need a thorough and radical reform, expecting it under current ownership or with Woodward as the CEO is not very realistic. From that perspective, Pochettino as hI think problem is Woodward is reluctant to hire DoF or someone who can do that role with different title. If we go by his UWS interview, he is absolutely convinced the model we have is working and they have no intention to change it. If that's the case then Poch might be our best bet.
Yeah, you're right — sometimes my brain wanders while thinking of theoretical solutions and I fail to consider that even though we need a thorough and radical reform, expecting it under current ownership or with Woodward as the CEO is not very realistic. From that perspective, Pochettino as head coachmanager might actually be the best bet.
We might have had different views on Ole, but what @roonster09 said and yours model is spot on and my model as well. A seasoned DoF and a young up and coming continental manager with fresh approach is what we need.One issue with Pochettino, is that his appointment would delay a much needed rethink of the administrative department. Practically none of the elite Champions League teams operate without a Director of Football or Sporting Director or Technical Director of some sort these days, yet United have been reluctant to employ one for who knows what reason — and once he consolidated enough power at Tottenham, Pochettino vetoed the appointment of a buffer between him and the higher ups (you can bet your bottom dollar that the same will happen at United)...
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/footbal...tell-mauricio-pochettino-would-not-get-level/
While he is a good coach, Pochettino wants to be an old school manager and exercise overwhelming influence, even though he doesn't have the most proven record in the transfer market — and that could be an explosive combination with our post-Fergie dealings in an effort to rebuild the squad. We'll essentially be putting all our eggs in the basket of one man while hoping and praying that he works his magic, for the umpteenth time — instead of engineering interwoven but distinct segments to delineate the myriad responsibilities, like we should.
For what its worth, Pochettino could hit the ground running and prove to be a massive success over time — so all of this might be needless fretting, but I'd be much more at ease with the combination of a high-caliber DoF to define our football model (like Rangnick or Overmars) + a Head Coach to train that model (like Nagelsmann/Rose or Ten Hag). A bit less proven than Pochettino maybe, and totally unproven in the English league — but that would give us a more sustainable long-term blueprint where once the structures are in place, you can basically replace head-coaches (which is a reality in post-modern football) without creating needless turmoil, which is how most big clubs operate and plan these days. Even though I like Pochettino, you get a sense that we need to cast a wide net to enact fundamental reform and indulge in some outside-the-box thinking, instead of just homing in on the convenient and seemingly obvious choice. All IMO, of course.