If true, would put to bed the Shaw to Chelsea rumours. Not bad for under 20M either.
Please be true Would make us clear favourites.
If true, would put to bed the Shaw to Chelsea rumours. Not bad for under 20M either.
One that liverpool fans dred.
Last time chelsea signed someone mourinho did not want it turned out badly (shevchenko).
He changes his mind every day. He knows nothing more than us, and in the last few weeks has shown to be no more clued up than FootballAgent007 type accounts.Didn't Jackson say Van Gaal had rejected the chance to sign Fabregas or something along those lines?
Ducker/ogden are the only knowledgable ones for united, all of the rest look for some efame to stroke their egos.He changes his mind every day. He knows nothing more than us, and in the last few weeks has shown to be no more clued up than FootballAgent007 type accounts.
Everyone seems to be feeding off scraps atm, as Woodward seems to have taken them all off speed dial.Ducker/ogden are the only knowledgable ones for united, all of the rest look for some efame to stroke their egos.
Or maybe he's gone dark.Everyone seems to be feeding off scraps atm, as Woodward seems to have taken them all off speed dial.
Ducker/ogden are the only knowledgable ones for united, all of the rest look for some efame to stroke their egos.
They all come off with bullshit at times. Daniel Taylor's article about Cavani being a good example.That's not true im afraid. In the Woodward era, Danny Taylor is the most trustworthy on Utd followed by Ian Ladyman. Ogden then follows, Ian Herbert not far behind.
Ducker is good but not in the league of the above 4.
They all come off with bullshit at times. Daniel Taylor's article about Cavani being a good example.
Well I posted yesterday that I was unsure of whether he genuinely wants a marquee signing or was just throwing out a red herring https://www.redcafe.net/threads/twitter-discussion.383154/page-165#post-15793087There is far more to that than you would think. You wouldnt believe how desperate Woodward is for a "marquee" signing.
Well I posted yesterday that I was unsure of whether he genuinely wants a marquee signing or was just throwing out a red herring https://www.redcafe.net/threads/twitter-discussion.383154/page-165#post-15793087
Didn't Jackson say Van Gaal had rejected the chance to sign Fabregas or something along those lines?
They all come off with bullshit at times. Daniel Taylor's article about Cavani being a good example.
If true, would put to bed the Shaw to Chelsea rumours. Not bad for under 20M either.
L'Equipe were reporting our interest in Cavani around Christmas time, as well as our broadsheets, and it's clear from the articles following obvious transfer briefings that Cavani was a target. Given that under Moyes, Van Persie likely to leave, as was Hernandez, and Welbeck was unhappy, his interest in Cavani would have made sense.
Just because things have changed does not make previous reports untrue.
We should sign Luis, one of the best left backs in the world.
Florentino Perez wants Suarez as his new toy for next season
Gotta love how Madrid go about their transfer business
Spanish really hate him too. I dont think fabregas will make chelsea his priority either.He seems to hate the Spanish so no real surprise. As I said earlier, I'd be amazed if Fabregas moves to Chelsea.
He seems to hate the Spanish so no real surprise. As I said earlier, I'd be amazed if Fabregas moves to Chelsea.
Correct.
Apparently Fabregas was critical of Mourinho and his antics when Jose was at Madrid. It doesn't really come across as a great match.