So then what are the guidelines to make a star? Apparently we can't include players that have come through our academy, we can't include players who have played well elsewhere, we are dismissing players who haven't been quality before we signed them, what are we left with? Please show me an example.
This is exactly what happens with football, you look at Barca's, City's, Madrid's, Bayern's set up and they will be exactly the same, a lot of players purchased who haven't made it.
You can cherry pick players at ANY top level club and make the exact same argument.
With Shaw, We will make him into a star, yes, but he was already well on his may to becoming one, with or without us.
I am all for buying young players on the off chance we get another Januzaj etc, but the last real star we produced was Ronaldo (yes he had a good reputation at Sporting, but nobody expected him to be what he has become)
But look at clubs today. How many youth players play for Chelsea. Terry
How many youth players play for City. Hart
How many youth players play for Liverpool. Sterling, Flannagan, Gerrard
How many at Arsenal. Gibbs, Ramsey, Wilshre, Walcott, Chamberlain
How many at United. Rafael, Evans, Jones, Smallling, Fletcher, Cleverley, Welbeck, Januzaj
I am not saying it's a bad thing that we bring our own players through, far from it, but in todays world, clubs let the smaller clubs produce them, then buy them when they are ready. That is how they are competing. This is why a lot of the players have bought haven't been given a chance from us, because it's risky business