Wonder how much we'd get for him? £12-15 million?
Twitter Discussion [Archive]
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
- Status
Wonder how much we'd get for him? £12-15 million?
Bayern Munich want to bring Real Madrid midfielder Sami Khedira back to Germany. (Source: MARCA)
Should aim for 20 million.
Cheech should get plenty of goals in that Atletico team and the Spanish league.
He's off isn't heCouldn't blame him mind. He was struggling for game time last season when we had CL. Without it he's barely going to get a sniff.
LVG's only been there 5 minutes and already he's God.
Hernandez leaving was inevitable. He's too good to be 3rd choice.
He's only ever going to be good enough to be super sub here so you can't blame him for wanting to go elsewhere
must be off to Spain. Apparently that's where God sends them all.
No one suspects the Spanish Inquisiton!
Yes so they can sell us Schweinsteger.
If was starting and scoring regularly, we could get £20 million easy.
But he's a back-up striker. We won't be able to demand £20 million for a back-up striker.
That and the Muller rumours were prime examples of how little the English media have a clue who we're after this summer.
Rummenigge has already denied the rumours about Khedira, unfortunately.
Anyways, the rumour was to sign him for next year on a free, that doesn't make Bastian any more attainable.
Ummm...ok?
He's not coming, simple as.
So we are still monitoring the situation.
Posted the same thing twice for some reason, and it was already posted, so deleted it anyway.
Marotta does a lot of talking but the rumours won't go away until Vidal comes out and says he's staying.
A bid might help with the hope thing...
Put a bid in Ed FFS!
Chelsea are masters at signing youth prospects for cheap, farming them out on loan then making a decent profit later.
While that is the case most of the time, Lukaku wasn't exactly a cheap signing for Chelsea.
Chelsea. Masters at this. Masters at that. Lots of love for Chelsea on this forum.
Not cheap but wasn't he quite highly rated at the time meaning the £10m or so they paid for him wasn't seen as all that much anyway.
Masters at harming careers in the process too, and littering the leagues with good talents on loan.
For what it's worth, I think it's clever but I don't really agree with it and wouldn't want United doing the same thing.
Chelsea would be the best team in the world at developing young players if only they could send them all on loan for their entire careers.
£18m, and going to Everton for £23.7m according to the BBC, so not that much of a profit, and they'll have to reinvest that at some point on another striker anyway as Costa, a bust flush in Torres and a 36-year-old Drogba isn't enough.
We've not lost hope, but we haven't made a bid either.....
"ah well, sorry Louis, we thought he would have paid the fee himself before jetting over".
Hernandez isn't the weak link in your set of strikers.
And who knows how Costa will settle into the Prem? At least with Lukaku he had been playing in the Premier League for a number of years and has got a great scoring record.
For me, the sale of Lukaku in return for bringing Drogba back is Chelsea's Pogba moment, though obviously they come out better in that they have brought in another striker and got a lot of cash for Lukaku, whereas we didn't get anything for Pogba and didn't sign a midfielder for ages. Striker department is the area Chelsea needed strengthening most, like with us and the midfield. We brought back Scholes which worked well, but ended up helping push Pogba away, while Chelsea have brought back Drogba who is past his best and in return have pushed away a striker who could have been there for a decade or more with a good goals return.
For me, the sale of Lukaku in return for bringing Drogba back is Chelsea's Pogba moment, though obviously they come out better in that they have brought in another striker and got a lot of cash for Lukaku, whereas we didn't get anything for Pogba and didn't sign a midfielder for ages. Striker department is the area Chelsea needed strengthening most, like with us and the midfield. We brought back Scholes which worked well, but ended up helping push Pogba away, while Chelsea have brought back Drogba who is past his best and in return have pushed away a striker who could have been there for a decade or more with a good goals return.
He is. As a squad player, 4th choice striker he's excellent and has a knack of scoring really important goals but he's very limited and even the goals dried up last year. I'll be sorry to see him go because he could be a really useful member of the squad, he's provided some great moment and seems like a genuinely nice person but he has to move if he wants to be a regular starter.
- Status