Would people stop quoting that unreliable site for transfers? His fee was £13m rising to £18m if certain conditions were met.
The Drogba comparisons are lazy in my opinion, they're different strikers. Drogba has much more finesse for one.Lukaku is a beast, and could be a massive player in time. Consider he's 20 years old and even at 16 was already bigger than 90% of players out there. He's a Drogba waiting to happen. Doesn't need to focus on muscling up, either, which means he can focus on refining his football talent despite his youth.
Drogba at 20 was nowhere near the level Lukaku is nowThe Drogba comparisons are lazy in my opinion, they're different strikers. Drogba has much more finesse for one.
True, but they're still not massively comparable as strikers.Drogba at 20 was nowhere near the level Lukaku is now
The Drogba comparisons are lazy in my opinion, they're different strikers. Drogba has much more finesse for one.
£25 million for a striker they don't want.I was going off the article linked on his Wiki page. Regardless, my point remains that Chelsea have done extremely well to get £25 million for him, in addition to the fees they've already gotten for Luiz and Mata.
£18 m for de Bruyne too AFAIR.£25 million for a striker they don't want.
€/£50 million for a truly awful centre back.
£37 million a brilliant number 10, who wasn't wanted for some reason.
In the space of about 7 months, Chelsea have become absolutely lethal in the transfer market.
Chelsea have made an overall profit on transfers this summer haven't they? Helps as long as you have suckers like PSG paying 50 mil for wet toilet paper.
£25 million for a striker they don't want.
€/£50 million for a truly awful centre back.
£37 million a brilliant number 10, who wasn't wanted for some reason.
In the space of about 7 months, Chelsea have become absolutely lethal in the transfer market.
Chelsea insist on Miranda http://ow.ly/zKRat
Article says that we (and Barca) 'baulked' at Atletico's €30m asking, but that Chelsea have now offered €25m.
Would people stop quoting that unreliable site for transfers? His fee was £13m rising to £18m if certain conditions were met. Anyway chelsea really have got a great negotiator for sales, we should get in someone to handle the transfer negotiations side of things for us, Ed and co seem to be good at getting value in commercial deals, not so good when it comes to footballers, it might help if we had people who had better knowledge of football.
Chelsea insist on Miranda but he Barcelona.
I find it amazing, that at the end of the year prior Jose's arrival, Benitez departue... and Chelsea fans were stoked most about Mata blossoming as the young fulcrum of the team, David Luiz was looking their next young midfield general, and young Lukaku looked such an exciting prospect to take over Drogba's mantle, and Mourinho has shipped all 3 out like they were yesterdays garbage, could you imagine the abuse the club would be recieving just now if their manager was anyone other than Mourinho?
The very obvious difference is that the players Chelsea are selling (with the probable exception of Luiz) they don't have room for but would be regulars at a lot of other sides.
Young players who have performed well on loan and were highly sought after before going to Chelsea, clubs will pay good money for. Likewise Mata who was their player of the season the year before he was sold and a class PL player.
We aren't selling players because we've got too much quality they cant get a game - it's more likely to be that they're past it or not good enough for the level they're playing at.
There's a reason why Lukaku goes for millions and Bebe goes for buttons.
But will Chelsea Miranda?He will never Chelsea!
Lukaku with one of Europe's best forwards.
Nope.Any rumours regarding us today?
We're still 'watching this space' then.Nope.