Twitter Discussion [Archive]

Status
Not open for further replies.
The transfer makes no sense, I'm usually excited at being linked with good players but I'm the exact opposite with Cavani, it's a complete waste of money.
 
It makes zero sense, we all agree. However, we've been strongly linked for months, just as we have Luke Shaw. I expect the rumours of there being a 'Manchester United transfer list' and a 'van Gaal transfer list' are probably true, which I saw reporters mentioning a few weeks ago.
I suspect he's just used as a PR line. Notice that the day after the Moyes sacking, his name was getting thrown about again at a very convenient time?

Woodward is a Glazer appointment. It goes completely against the Glazer's interest to spend such a huge fee on a player that the manager doesn't particularly want, who plays in a position that we're strong in. They're business men at the the end of the day and the transfer makes zero sense from both a footballing standpoint and a business one.
 
Are you being serious???

Read the tweet again!!:rolleyes:

Yeah I know he's claiming it's been translated but if it had been it'd be completely different & again, he's the first person to report it.

Thought that Alex Shaw was known for spouting shite anyway but wasn't sure if it was him or one of the many others.
 
The transfer makes no sense, I'm usually excited at being linked with good players but I'm the exact opposite with Cavani, it's a complete waste of money.
Maybe we are buying Cavani and also planing to invest in other parts off our team. If chicha leaves, RVP/Rooney/Wellback/Cavani - we don't have champions league but injuries happen, nothing wrong with having 3 world class players/strikers in our ranks. If the club can afford it, no problem.
 
Are you people serious? fecking hell. I'd rather the morons in here who blame Woodward for us being linked to players would piss off before he does. He's a fecking Chief Executive, not a director of football and not the club's owner. He's purely in charge of negotiating transfers, he is not responsible for our transfer strategy or our list of targets. Get that through your thick skulls.
Good post. X100, or whatever that shite thing is people post when they really agee with something.
 
Maybe we are buying Cavani and also planing to invest in other parts off our team. If chicha leaves, RVP/Rooney/Wellback/Cavani - we don't have champions league but injuries happen, nothing wrong with having 3 world class players/strikers in our ranks. If the club can afford it, no problem.


No because it will dictate the way we play, having to accommodate a player on 300k a week, a £60m striker and presumably our next captain in RvP is a recipe for disaster. Then you throw in the Mata problem and how we go about fitting him and even Kagawa in the mix and its a complete mess.

We should be looking to drop 1-2 strikers if anything and improve our midfield and wingers along with our defence, pretty much every single position except goalkeeper and striker could do with an upgrade.
 
Football is littered with people like Woodward that do inexplicable things. It's just a new concept to us because, until a year ago, we've been in good hands.
You'll post any old shite to perpetuate the myth that anyone but Moyes was to blame for our clusterfeck last summer.
 
Cutting through all the crazy paper talk and such, I wonder realistically how many deals we are trying to conduct at the moment? As each day passes I become convinced nothing is happening until the World Cup is over.
 
Cutting through all the crazy paper talk and such, I wonder realistically how many deals we are trying to conduct at the moment? As each day passes I become convinced nothing is happening until the World Cup is over.
We're signing Cavani.

Well, Woodward is.
 
No because it will dictate the way we play, having to accommodate a player on 300k a week, a £60m striker and presumably our next captain in RvP is a recipe for disaster. Then you throw in the Mata problem and how we go about fitting him and even Kagawa in the mix and its a complete mess.

We should be looking to drop 1-2 strikers if anything and improve our midfield and wingers along with our defence, pretty much every single position except goalkeeper and striker could do with an upgrade.
I think we don't need to worry about how to accommodate Cavani. If Van gall wants hime and our interest is not media bullshit, then I am sure Van gaal is aware off Rooney/RVP situation and he will have a plan to keep all off his attacking players happy. He is experience enough to know these sort off signings can destabilise the whole squad. But I understand your concern, it does look a bit confusing, fitting Cavani with our current strikers.
 
Absolute bollocks. Why would he be running around trying to sign players of his own accord?


Why wouldn't he? All he needs to do is check in with the caf and he has all the information about who he needs to sign and how much he is allowed to pay. Additionally, what formation LvG needs to play is all here.

Simples!
 
Because they're retarded.

Did we have van Gaals blessing when we were persuing him months ago? Journalists have been saying since then that Cavani is a target that Woodward wants to happen. I don't believe for a second that van Gaal wants to add another expensive striker to our ranks, he's got enough issues to deal with in that position as it is. Luke Shaw is another signing that is obviously one the club wanted to make, regardless of who the next manager would be.
 
Why wouldn't he? All he needs to do is check in with the caf and he has all the information about who he needs to sign and how much he is allowed to pay. Additionally, what formation LvG needs to play is all here.

Simples!
:lol: You just described me there
 
I reckon we should save complaining about signing Cavani until such time as we sign him. That way it will be more special.
 
I really cannot seriously comprehend why some posters on here actually believe that Woodward would sign a player without LvG's agreement, incredible

I agree. How anyone can believe something so ridiculous is beyond me. To think that Van Gaal would simply work with the players Woodward signs for him is mind bogglingly stupid.
 
Did we have van Gaals blessing when we were persuing him months ago? Journalists have been saying since then that Cavani is a target that Woodward wants to happen. I don't believe for a second that van Gaal wants to add another expensive striker to our ranks, he's got enough issues to deal with in that position as it is. Luke Shaw is another signing that is obviously one the club wanted to make, regardless of who the next manager would be.
Ah, journalists are saying it so it's happening, and definitely all Woodward's doing.

You're not even subtle anymore. Give it a rest, it's tedious.
 
I agree. How anyone can believe something so ridiculous is beyond me. To think that Van Gaal would simply work with the players Woodward signs for him is mind bogglingly stupid.

I wonder how many of the players we had previously been linked with and possibly made in-roads to sign under the previous two managers Van Gaal would fancy? For example, the resurfaced link with Ander Herrera? Is that more paper talk or is there something to it?
 
I wonder how many of the players we had previously been linked with and possibly made in-roads to sign under the previous two managers Van Gaal would fancy? For example, the resurfaced link with Ander Herrera? Is that more paper talk or is there something to it?
I can confirm that it is definitely one or the other.
 
Did we have van Gaals blessing when we were persuing him months ago? Journalists have been saying since then that Cavani is a target that Woodward wants to happen. I don't believe for a second that van Gaal wants to add another expensive striker to our ranks, he's got enough issues to deal with in that position as it is. Luke Shaw is another signing that is obviously one the club wanted to make, regardless of who the next manager would be.
Do you think so chief, I mean Woodward is not really in a position to force his signing on Van gaal. We finished 7th - We need to get back to top 4 (obvious) I think fro now Van gaal is in total control off our transfers, maybe once we are up and running Woodward can sign his "star" player.
 
Absolute bollocks. Why would he be running around trying to sign players of his own accord?

Because I've read from a good source (would need to look it up) that he wants a superstar signing.

I even found it. http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/apr/23/manchester-united-edinson-cavani-cesc-fabregas

Woodward wants to bring a superstar to the club and his ambition of bringing Cristiano Ronaldo back to Manchester seems a long way away.
 
Did we have van Gaals blessing when we were persuing him months ago? Journalists have been saying since then that Cavani is a target that Woodward wants to happen. I don't believe for a second that van Gaal wants to add another expensive striker to our ranks, he's got enough issues to deal with in that position as it is. Luke Shaw is another signing that is obviously one the club wanted to make, regardless of who the next manager would be.
1. LvG wasn't our manager months ago 2. Don't really care what journalists are saying 3. If Luke Shaw is a signing the club still wants to make then it will be because LvG has said he is Ok with it, otherwise it won't happen
You can picture the scene: LvG returns from the WC, first day at United, Woodward comes up to him and says " Welcome to United and Surprise! I've blown all the transfer budget on a few players I quite fancied buying myself." LvG replies "Oh, wonderful and it's not even my birthday!" Then the fairy godmother ran away with the goblins- I mean what happened to the real world!!!
 
Did we have van Gaals blessing when we were persuing him months ago? Journalists have been saying since then that Cavani is a target that Woodward wants to happen. I don't believe for a second that van Gaal wants to add another expensive striker to our ranks, he's got enough issues to deal with in that position as it is. Luke Shaw is another signing that is obviously one the club wanted to make, regardless of who the next manager would be.
No, because van Gaal wasn't the manager, David Moyes was.
 
I wonder how many of the players we had previously been linked with and possibly made in-roads to sign under the previous two managers Van Gaal would fancy? For example, the resurfaced link with Ander Herrera? Is that more paper talk or is there something to it?

My best guess is everything that we read is just paper talk as LvG is completely focused on Holland now. Excepting the Dutch players who he could easily recruit in private at this moment, I doubt Woodward is going to proceed with anything until the WC is over - unless of course LvG has already given the go ahead to a player or two who aren't involved in the WC (like that Ukrainian player for example). Otherwise, I wouldn't expect any business until mid July at a minimum.
 
If this Cavani thing is true then I wouldn't be surprised at all if its a Woodward thing rather then a Van Gaal thing. Think he really wants to do a marquee signing just to prove people wrong or whatever. Really hope it doesn't happen though. Would be a bigger waste of money then Fellaini was.
 
Because I've read from a good source (would need to look it up) that he wants a superstar signing.

I even found it. http://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/apr/23/manchester-united-edinson-cavani-cesc-fabregas
Firstly, there is a difference between lining up a deal for one of the best players in the World who would walk into any team before presenting it to the manager and just going after someone he fancies as a good player and a big signing. Secondly, even in this circumstance, van Gaal would 100% have to sign off on/agree to/authorise the signing before it was completed.

Even saying that, I doubt wholeheartedly that Woodward would venture from the list of specific names given to him by the team's manager. Woodward is a business man, not a football man and, contrary to popular belief, he did not obtain this high profile job by being an idiot and therefore would be aware of this.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.