saivet
Full Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2013
- Messages
- 26,408
It would be nice to see a "United agree fee with Real Madrid for Di Maria". At least then we would know the stubbling block is Di Maria.buy one get one free?
If Ian Ladyman is correct, then we've offered him a very lucrative deal.We won't pay him that. He'll go to PSG on loan.
We're in much more of a need for a defensive midfielder than we are a centre back....which would help our central defender shortage by exactly nothing. Thanks for that, SW.
Is this guy on a wum?
Is this guy on a wum?
Claims to work for media agency contracted by mufcHe's a nobody. Use a little common sense.
I invented Twitter and I can tell you from my records that he is lying.Claims to work for media agency contracted by mufc
I disagree, but we're all entitled to our opinion. I feel that if we are going to play three at the back then we need to have more than three first team players. Blackett & Keane need more experience before they have expectations of being CL-quality thrust upon them.We're in much more of a need for a defensive midfielder than we are a centre back.
Won't we? I'm sure we'd be willing to pay £200k p/w, how much is that a year?We won't pay him that. He'll go to PSG on loan.
What a nob. He sounds just like me.
Another example of our bad transfer policy. At least we wins trophies to make up for it...Would have preferred we do both like Chelsea though
If Ian Ladyman is correct, then we've offered him a very lucrative deal.
The only reason the price is that high is because PSG and their shitty little project exist.
€75 million for a player who wants to leave and is surplus to requirements. Ridiculous.
Can see it now, Transfer deadline day, Jim White will be close to ejaculating as he announces Di Maria has signed a 4 + 1 year deal
For PSG
That tweet makes absolutely no sense. I am amazed how some of you trust any random tweet and start moaning about transfer policy. Yes it hasn't been great but that tweet is senseless.
What is that tweet trying to say? Is it adding Rojo transfer fee and Nani wages and equate it with Carvalho's fee? How is it apple to apple, both financially books wise and football wise? Rojo is CB and Carvalho is CM. Second, Carvalho is no proven world beater himself, yet. That tweet implies as if we are missing out on Vidal there. Third, we don't even know the agreement between United and Sporting regarding Nani. I don't think we will pay his FULL wages and send him there. Will help us no end unless there are some conditions for future and wages are shared partially.
The Moyes effect.In hindsight that Nani contract renewal was such utter lunacy considering the inconsistent form he had showed in Saf's last season and throughout his career.
We will now struggle to offload him for the next 3 years, because of those wages.
Another example of our bad transfer policy. At least we wins trophies to make up for it...Would have preferred we do both like Chelsea though
Wasn't trying to argue anything...This is where your argument breaks down...
We do this far too often and it's leaving us in messy position.In hindsight that Nani contract renewal was such utter lunacy considering the inconsistent form he had showed in Saf's last season and throughout his career.
We will now struggle to offload him for the next 3 years, because of those wages.