Don't do this to yourself, man!
But from a serious analytical POV, it
is possible, and it's the sort of thing that has been done before.
But there are a few reasons as to why I'd say it's objectively a lot less likely for us to bridge a 10 point gap this season than it has been for other sides in previous seasons.
The first is that we're not chasing one team. We're chasing four. If Leicester maintain reasonable form till the end of the season, we can't win it. If Spurs do fairly well, we can't win it. If Arsenal or City hit excellent form, we can't win it. Even
with us winning every game, it's still unlikely. And there's almost no chance we're going to win every game from now until the end of the season, which takes me onto my next point...
The points total. It's all well and good coming from 10 points behind to win it on 90 points. City bridged an 8 point gap against us, for example.
But the problem is that in most seasons, a side who wins the title but were 10 points behind remains a very good side who are generally getting results, but happened to be against an even better performing side who hit some poorer form. In other words, it's much more likely for a side with 60 points after 28 games (which is decent without being brilliant), to bridge a 10 point gap, than it is for a side with 47 points to win 10 games in a row. That's not to say it can't be done, but if we assume this hypothetical run begins at the Arsenal game, to win the title we would have to win
more games in our final 12 than we did in our first 26.
Add in a feckton of injury problems, the fact that we aren't a high scoring side, and nah, it's extremely, ridiculously unlikely. Although, so was Leicester potentially winning the Premier League last August...but still, no way it's happening.