We should offer them Lukaku for Sanchez, then send Stormzy down to do the medical and sign the paperwork.
Transfer Tweets - Summer 2017 | Keep it on topic
- Thread starter Damien
- Start date
It seems clubs have no real idea how to run themselves professionally. They could have sold him, signed 3-4 quality players by now and improved the squad. No one would really be criticising them. Now it's an absolute shambles.
Or they were waiting for him to renew.
No they are not.
Well that was never going to happen was it? If I can see that surely they can as well. I genuinely think a clued up fan knows more about how clubs should conduct transfers than some of these boards, especially Arsenal.
Next 48 hours mean last day of the market ?
Damn. Pep you greedy fecker. I'll be gutted if Sanchez goes to City, he's the best player in the league when inform. It would almost make City dead certs for the PL.
I do admit they won't find a replacement same quality as Sanchez, but when you have a player who clearly wants out, you swallow your pride and do what's best for your club. The entire Arsenal organization is still butt hurt that RvP moved to United and won the title. That thinking is now coming into the equation here, but they are forgetting that City are here for their annual piece of action.
No it isn't, not in a market where Leicester want that much for Danny Drinkwater ffs. Stop spouting moronic shite.
And it's Euros, not Pounds.
What makes you think they did not make a mistake?
Are you as naive as Wenger?
It's also a shambles that Ozil and Sanchez were allowed to run their deals down to one year. You think that would ever happen to us with Pogba and Lukaku? Or Chelsea with Hazard? Never.
City will pay even more, as high as 75 - 80 m. Arsenal can create a bidding war for him .
Who cares if we sell Mike to Arsenal because I know Mourinho wouldn't do the deal unless a certain Alexis was apart of the deal.
On the conditions he would be allowed to leave next summer.
WHen the players dont sign , what can the clubs do. They dint allow them
Sterling wont be sold by city and why would he approve the move? he was dying to sign for city when he left liv.
£50m for Sanchez is a piss-take given some of the transfers this summer. Sigurdsson went for £45m for christs sake.
No, it's indecipherable.Does that even make sense?
Its not like he's going to Wolves. Arse are still a massive club and this would basically be a lateral move for him.
That would be an astonishing deal for Arsenal for player who could leave for free in little over 9 months.
Sigurdsson wasn't 4 months away from signing a pre-contract with another club and leave the following year for free.
No chance City baulk at a difference of 20m, they'll get him if Arsenal want to sell.
Yep. Sterling also has a lot of upside and City have a lot of money so it wouldn't at all surprise me if it happened as Pep is under immense pressure to start delivering some silverware.
Not really. He left Liverpool for City because he wanted to win the league. He's not going to be able to do that at Arsenal.
Might as well chuck a £75m bid in for Sanchez, same with Lemar. If we're not in for these guys we might as well drive up the price for our biggest rivals.
Arsenal will do just fine this year imo (despite their poor start). They may not win the league, but City aren't guaranteed to win it either. I also think Sterling would link up well with Lacazette.
It's frustrating that we're not in for Sanchez. We should be going for a player of his calibre.
It seems to say Arsenal have asked for Sterling and then rejected the deal.
I see where you are going with this. By the way SO was liv matey.