RDCR07
Not a bad guy (Whale Killer)
I would like him on the right as a different option to Mkhi and Mata.Why do you need Mahrez? You have better players than him.
I would like him on the right as a different option to Mkhi and Mata.Why do you need Mahrez? You have better players than him.
Tbh he is not better than them, Mourinho needs to take more from Mikhy.I would like him on the right as a different option to Mkhi and Mata.
You say post 2010 pep has been better than post 2010 version of jose. But yet the current jose has won many important trophies when compared to pep. People underrate Jose's work at real madrid, let us not forget it was Jose's madrid that pipped pep's greatest barca side to the la liga title. He came at chelsea and won the title and yes he had a horrendous third season but still you cannot just forget he won the title with chelsea. Yes pep also won 3 consecutive titles with Bayern but is it really that tough to do that. Then jose took over a broken manchester united while pep took over a not so broken team , yet jose managed to win trophies. So this whole theory jose is past it is becoming boring.Everyone has their own opinion. I would say Pep is better than current Mou
Mahrez is a better right winger than Mata for sure. I want to get Mahrez so we can finally push Mata to play only as a #10.Tbh he is not better than them, Mourinho needs to take more from Mikhy.
A 10 if Mou goes for 4/2/3/1?Mahrez is a better right winger than Mata for sure. I want to get Mahrez so we can finally push Mata to play only as a #10.
You brought SAF into discussion, then Mourinho & bunch other coaches. As I see other people mostly kept on topic about Pep's ambition & Cruyff which coming from that tweet.Starting what? I don't discuss, I only give my opinion, is it ok for you?
Really? So what, can I ask?
Not so clear for me that Barcelona 2009 had a better squad than United tbh.
Were my arguments all so bad, that nothing sounded reasonable to you? Sad.
Ah, now you counter argument, why can't I do the same?
Is that your best argument or don't you understand when you are on a forum, as such you don't insult personally no 1, you are free to say what you think. They used to call it Democracy
Nobody said that, actually it is United fans who say that about Guardiola tbh.So pep is allowed spend million to revolutionise city but when jose did the same with chelsea back in 2004 and made them successful and created a strong base, people said he bought the league. Don't get this difference.
Why do you need Mahrez? You have better players than him.
He's the last player our attack needs. We need pace and power.
Doesnt 4-2-3-1 employ a #10?A 10 if Mou goes for 4/2/3/1?
Maybe his head already turned before league was over and I know he bucked up the last few weeks but he had over a month were you could see he was not liking it at arsenal.One season out of the CL and instead of being willing to help the club fight to get back in, instead he wants to run away.
If you think nobody has ever alluded to jose as a cheque book manager and chelsea buying the league , then I think you have been living on a rock.Nobody said that, actually it is United fans who say that about Guardiola tbh.
On my part it was only a question, don't look to me as a outsider the most important aspect in the squad, but doesn't matter, it is Mourinho who knows what he wants, we are on a forum, so we just speculate.Don't people understand the principle of squad depth? He would certainly give us options and improve what we have. He's better than Mata and would add pace.
Sorry mate, I was only exchanging opinions, no intention to say anything bad, don't take this so seriously, say something coolPS: I am off this discussion here on this thread & I will do as I say.
Yes, only a question, because untill now I dunno if he is going to stick with that system, or switch to a 4/3/3.Doesnt 4-2-3-1 employ a #10?
Don't people understand the principle of squad depth? He would certainly give us options and improve what we have. He's better than Mata and would add pace.
Oh my bad didnt realize you were asking a question to me. Erm Im guessing we play a 4-3-3 with 3 proper central midfielders against top sides and 4-2-3-1 against weaker opposition. Mata is more highly to start the latter option given who we sign this window.Yes, only a question, because untill now I dunno if he is going to stick with that system, or switch to a 4/3/3.
Of course I know that, you just need to check Liverpool fans on their forums or in newspapers websites comments.If you think nobody has ever alluded to jose as a cheque book manager and chelsea buying the league , then I think you have been living on a rock.
Of course I know that, you just need to check Liverpool fans on their forums or in newspapers websites comments.
Funnily enough, United fans did the same to him when he was at Chelsea, how times change so fast
Would like to see him returning to a 4/4/2 diamond when he was at Porto, and sometimes used it at Chelsea too, in the first time he was there, on matches against Arsenal.Oh my bad didnt realize you were asking a question to me. Erm Im guessing we play a 4-3-3 with 3 proper central midfielders against top sides and 4-2-3-1 against weaker opposition. Mata is more highly to start the latter option given who we sign this window.
What? Wasn't Conte or Juve after him?They signing a new player for every position?
If he was at anywhere other than Arsenal I'd agree with you completely. But Arsenal have become so stale as a club they couldn't do in 10 years what Juve did in that time. They haven't moved forward in a decade, are showing few signs of doing so, and their rivals are stronger than ever.This is such a pathetic excuse and false claim of ambition.
Juve were relegated. A player of Buffon's status stayed and within a few short years has seen two cup finals.
Behave!Shit, even LVG or moyes could probably build a league winning side with half a billion pounds.
We were but then we signed Costa and now we cannot buy any non-EU player.What? Wasn't Conte or Juve after him?
Damn they signed him as well? Two full backs in three days. Not bad.
The only information we have is the date and geotag. He is probably replying to some rumours that he is in Manchester/is signing for City right at this moment etc. (are there any?)Damn they signed him as well? Two full backs in three days. Not bad.
Surely BS ... They already signed Walker
They need another rb. They had none (not counting youth) before they signed Walker
Fake news, why would he come?Weird move after getting Walker...