This makes no sense... They can't even use him until Jan so where's the desperation coming from?
This makes no sense... They can't even use him until Jan so where's the desperation coming from?
Read it as Qui Ca instead of Oui Ca in French my bad, Oui Ca means Yes this.Qui ca is what language, man? It's Oui ça, literally, “yes that”.
Carrick has been a good servant and has grown on me, but throughout the years I always felt we could've done better as well, but that's another discussion. And I know you're trying to highlight that sometimes "average" players turn out alright but, personally, I need more than that...Dier is just....
Seems like only the The Independent haven't picked up Woodie's call yet.
I remember when we signed Carrick. Average and nothing special was something people said that time. They obviously don't feel the same anymore. That said, no one knows the future, but I think Dier has something that is worth exploring if we get him.
If I was told before the summer we'd spend 180m on Perisic, Dier and Lukaku I would've said fair play, good to see we are continuing the 4 year trend of absurd purchases.
Lukaku & Perisic are still okay by me but Dier? Come on - what exactly does Dier offer to our midfield?
I'm curious to know with what players we could have done better than Carrick? Because I'm incredulous at what you've said.
However, if you really meant that we could have done better in surrounding Michael with better midfielders to protect him and complement his game better, that I can agree with. He's the best English CM of the last decade and if we stretch back further outside Scholes and maybe Gerrard.
Carrick is such an odd case on here. He really went from underrated to overrated on the Caf during the 12/13 season when he was absolutely fantastic in the league. He's clearly a few tiers below United's greatest midfielders and could never handle battles against elite midfielders of other clubs like Keane, Scholes or Robson could. He stood out in 12/13 when the midfields in the Premier League were in general on a truely poor level compared to the past (and probably soon present), but at no point did he excel in the CL or was worthy of a regular starting spot for England (judged on his actual performances for the nationalteam).
He was a great support to the elite players in the team during United's sensational years from 2006 to 2011 and you could often read harsh criticism about his role on here, which then all of a sudden changed when the team around him declined while he still kept his level. Now you can read comments how England failed to build a team around him and stuff like that, which is frankly nonsense. He was never good enough to build a team or a midfield around him if you want to actually challenge for the biggest trophies.
Guy sounds like a moron. His backpassing to rivals is also moronic. Does he have any redeeming qualities?I think he was joking but Chelsea fans may have taken it the wrong way so promptly deleted it.
No, I meant exactly what you read. I don't know what i've said that's so unfathomable, Carrick ended up being a good player but its not like he's an all time great, there's been some revisioning regarding carrick's quality, especially on this forum and in the past few years. Dude went from under appreciated in his early years to being grossly overrated, somehow his legend just took an amazing uptake to levels that just aren't true, its a curious case really. @Balu articulated some of my thoughts in a different thread:
Carrick was always impressive with his reading of the game and passing off either foot when he was with Spurs. Can't see the same with Dier. I rather play TFM or Axel.
A solid, mobile stopper so Pogba can focus on attacking.Lukaku & Perisic are still okay by me but Dier? Come on - what exactly does Dier offer to our midfield?
We're looking to close out the Perisic deal but still around 10m short of valuation of Inter. How does that work out then?
Ideally? Ideally, we suddenly brief the press that we've agreed a fee with Arsenal for Sanchez and are no longer interested in Perisic. Realistically, we agree a midway point with Inter with some stuff linked of performances etc. and close this out.We're looking to close out the Perisic deal but still around 10m short of valuation of Inter. How does that work out then?
Ideally? Ideally, we suddenly brief the press that we've agreed a fee with Arsenal for Sanchez and are no longer interested in Perisic. Realistically, we agree a midway point with Inter with some stuff linked of performances etc. and close this out.
Not quite 100M but maybe the Gareth Bale windfall...?Could this potentially be the most underwhelming £100m ever spent
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Big difference between Giggs and Januzaj was that the former was managed by Sir Alex at a relatively settled time for both manager and club. Giggsy himself encouraged Januzaj to take up the number. Talent-wise, it was not that big a difference.In hindsight we were far too quick to give him 11 and Depay 7.
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Big difference between Giggs and Januzaj was that the former was managed by Sir Alex at a relatively settled time for both manager and club. Giggsy himself encouraged Januzaj to take up the number. Talent-wise, it was not that big a difference.
Agree about Memphis though.
his point is he is always there at the start of pre season. Every year hes on the plane with the team when they start the tour. Him not being there is slightly odd. One would figure hes trying to finish up a deal or two
Hindsight is a wonderful thing. Big difference between Giggs and Januzaj was that the former was managed by Sir Alex at a relatively settled time for both manager and club. Giggsy himself encouraged Januzaj to take up the number. Talent-wise, it was not that big a difference.
Agree about Memphis though.
How likely do we reckon Dier is? Should I start brainwashing myself into liking him yet?