I still dont agree with you on this. We are 2nd in the league on "possession score" at home (i think this includes possession and pass accuracy). We are 8th when it comes to "attacking score" even though we are 2nd in the league on shot accuracy in home games. Every team misses sitters. They come back, create more, and score. We didnt do that, we didnt create enough to make up for the missed chances.
Moreover, a world class possession based team that relies on one players size (read Fellaini) to get up the field in crucial matches needs to take a look at itself, and bring in players that can keep the ball under pressure and play football on the ground. Does a counter attacking player like Perisic help with that? I dont think so. I can understand that there are different horses for different courses, so a counter attacking player can add another dimension to our team - even then Perisic is not the standard Man Utd should aspire to.
Well, I guess we will have to agree to disagree then. What I saw in those drawn games at home (and away) was chance after chance squandered to bury the games. I can count at least 10 games we could easily have buried but we threw away due to lost chances. Jose and the players at various times, attested to this. Pundit after pundit, testified to it. There are a handful of articles written on our missed chances.
At top level football, you do not need a million chances to nail your opponents. You just need to be clinical enough and we were not during the season.
Our counter attacking weaknesses showed up mostly in the big games. Not that I am a fan of Jose's methods in such games (I prefer Klopp's or Pep's methods) but I do understand how they are supposed to work and in fairness to him, they have served him well throughout his career. He chooses to soak in pressure and hit on the counter. For me, that's where players like Perisic come in.
About Perisic not being the standard a club like United should aspire for, I think that's a wild generalisation. Managers have their preferences, so do players. A successful transfer is all about who is available, which club is willing to sell, which player a manager prefers, which players want to go to which club, city or league and of course, finance. Di Maria was class as a player but his heart was not at United, so was he the best we could have gotten? Neymar is world class but what if living in Manchester would make his life miserable? What if Jose called Douglas Costa and said, 'Hey, I want you at United but be ready to rotate because I want Martial to get game time." But Costa said, 'I would like to come but I cannot play in a rotational situation again. It's either I am completely first choice or no deal." What if that's why Jose moved on?
Jose has admired Perisic for years. I remember his glowing comments about him at the last Euros (and Perisic was indeed one of the outstanding players of the tournament). What if he remains convinced Perisic is the best winger you can find out there? What if Perisic has told him he will do anything to play for United, comply with any rotational policy and accept the salary offered? What if a hundred other things?
Well, those are hypothetical but possible scenarios. Bottomline is that we hardly have enough information to understand the reasons behind some transfer moves.
We don't know. So just saying 'why don't they get Costa or Bale instead?' might just not cut it in the real world.