Judas
Open to offers
See, we're not being silly.
Talk of Bayern trying to hijack City's move for de Bruyne.
Good to see Red Issue putting a positive spin on it as ever.
It isn't about not being wrong, it's about being right, having solid information, investigative journalism, that sort of thing. You could pick any randomer on the street and they could write some vague story without really committing to anything.They still haven't been wrong or massively off the mark, shit happens.
Der western (Known as 100% for dortmund news) said we had a deal with gundogan, nothing came of it. It was then revealed that gundogan once receiving interest from barca and bayern demanded higher wages and a deal was called off by lvg and woody.
As for them only knowing what the club has briefed them with, the same could be said for guilluim balague. Madrid mouth piece number one, yet people take him more seriously on here.
Does that make der western wrong ?
fecking Red Issue and their "inside knowledge"
My sock puppet has more inside knowledge.
What's that, Mr Socky? You know who we're buying next? And Elvis isn't really dead?! Say that again; you want me to do what to Kate Beckinsale? Well, I'm not sure she'll go for it but I guess there's no harm in asking.
I can't find that anywhere on Socky's Twitter, tbf.
I like the sound of thisSoften the blow for the fans when we get Muller.
My sock puppet doesn't have Twitter account, because he doesn't understand technology. Because he's a sock.
It is, and the section it'll most likely be in is one you have to pay to view. Please don't post those sort of tweets againThis is more of a clickbait advert rather than a tweet.
You can't read what they've written without signing up!
Its worded like a world exclusive announcement as well.
Indeed. One guy earlier on was demanding an explanation from the club for United failing to sign Pedro. He didn't state whether the reasoning would need to be made in person or whether a bullet pointed email / apology would suffice.Top post.
It is, and the section it'll most likely be in is one you have to pay to view. Please don't post those sort of tweets again
It isn't about not being wrong, it's about being right, having solid information, investigative journalism, that sort of thing. You could pick any randomer on the street and they could write some vague story without really committing to anything.
Good post. I'd give it a like if I could.Social media has certainly put an interesting twist on the silly season in recent years. After every tweet or article the first question people ask is are they reliable? If you're for the idea/statement you don't need to look far for confirmation, ditto if you are against. Then, when the club makes a statement, they are either lying to save face or confirming what you had been saying they thought all along. There is not one club in the world that is forthright in there comments when it comes to transfers, they are all liars and rightfully so. Not to mention the subterfuge clubs will use to make others look bad/foolish, tell me that aint happening daily!
The other thing I find interesting is that single tweets, no matter where they come from, can take on a life of their own. One guy says something, others retweet and it may even land on a dot com as an article giving it even more credence when none is deserved. After a while a BS tweet becomes gospel, and people reference back to it as proof of their bias when it all started out from some unknown dude (dudette?) behind a keyboard trying to make a name for themselves or get clicks to stay employed.
The bottom line is there are only a handful of people that really know what is going on in any particular deal and those people are in a position where any leaks of information could be detrimental to their cause so they don't say anything. When they don't say anything twatters and journalists still need to put something out there so they guess at what looks reasonable/plausible, or just try and strike a nerve with the worst case scenario. Either way it's all bullshit yet it is remarkable how many of you think you can sift through all this crap and know exactly what really happened.
Social media has certainly put an interesting twist on the silly season in recent years. After every tweet or article the first question people ask is are they reliable? If you're for the idea/statement you don't need to look far for confirmation, ditto if you are against. Then, when the club makes a statement, they are either lying to save face or confirming what you had been saying they thought all along. There is not one club in the world that is forthright in there comments when it comes to transfers, they are all liars and rightfully so. Not to mention the subterfuge clubs will use to make others look bad/foolish, tell me that aint happening daily!
The other thing I find interesting is that single tweets, no matter where they come from, can take on a life of their own. One guy says something, others retweet and it may even land on a dot com as an article giving it even more credence when none is deserved. After a while a BS tweet becomes gospel, and people reference back to it as proof of their bias when it all started out from some unknown dude (dudette?) behind a keyboard trying to make a name for themselves or get clicks to stay employed.
The bottom line is there are only a handful of people that really know what is going on in any particular deal and those people are in a position where any leaks of information could be detrimental to their cause so they don't say anything. When they don't say anything twatters and journalists still need to put something out there so they guess at what looks reasonable/plausible, or just try and strike a nerve with the worst case scenario. Either way it's all bullshit yet it is remarkable how many of you think you can sift through all this crap and know exactly what really happened.
Social media has certainly put an interesting twist on the silly season in recent years. After every tweet or article the first question people ask is are they reliable? If you're for the idea/statement you don't need to look far for confirmation, ditto if you are against. Then, when the club makes a statement, they are either lying to save face or confirming what you had been saying they thought all along. There is not one club in the world that is forthright in there comments when it comes to transfers, they are all liars and rightfully so. Not to mention the subterfuge clubs will use to make others look bad/foolish, tell me that aint happening daily!
The other thing I find interesting is that single tweets, no matter where they come from, can take on a life of their own. One guy says something, others retweet and it may even land on a dot com as an article giving it even more credence when none is deserved. After a while a BS tweet becomes gospel, and people reference back to it as proof of their bias when it all started out from some unknown dude (dudette?) behind a keyboard trying to make a name for themselves or get clicks to stay employed.
The bottom line is there are only a handful of people that really know what is going on in any particular deal and those people are in a position where any leaks of information could be detrimental to their cause so they don't say anything. When they don't say anything twatters and journalists still need to put something out there so they guess at what looks reasonable/plausible, or just try and strike a nerve with the worst case scenario. Either way it's all bullshit yet it is remarkable how many of you think you can sift through all this crap and know exactly what really happened.
I'm actually on the website, they get a lot right before it hits the media.'we don't know shit, just pretending but we predicted this one right so read more of our bullshit pls'
Never change RI.
Good post. I think technology in general, and specifically social media as you've said, has intensified the herd behavior of how fans perceive the slightest bits of information about the club and players. During matches, its quite common to see posters scamper off to player threads to vent about how player x or y is underperforming. Its more even noticeable in the transfer forum where posters seem to be in competition for who can break the latest tweet news first, which creates a lot of low quality tweets and has a knock on effect of other posters nonsensically discussing the content of those low quality tweets. Its a vicious cycle that can't be broken unless one first notices its happening.
I'm actually on the website, they get a lot right before it hits the media.
I don't agree that posters see it as a competition to break news via tweets. I certainly don't. I post tweets when I have spare time. Also I like the drama of the transfer window and trying to figure out what's BS and what's not. It's part of the fun and what keeps me sane when footy has left us during July. I suspect that's the case of most who spend a lot time here. I also find it strange how people shoot down people who post tweets yet moan when there's 2 pages of discussion with no tweets. I've certainly had fun decoding tweets and articles this summer.
apparently it is £10 to sign up .
It is solely that now yes - it used to be a fanzine as well until that was shut down recently.
I just thought it interesting they lay the blame on Woodward and are hinting that something big may be in the offing.
Haven't their inside scoops dried up as of late though? How a United forum have inside knowledge on Chelsea v Jose is behind me
what are they saying?
Good to see Red Issue putting a positive spin on it as ever.
'we don't know shit, just pretending but we predicted this one right so read more of our bullshit pls'
Never change RI.
No can do amigo. They have people who check all these forums to see if anyone is leaking stuff. Then they track and ban them.We will believe you if you share what is the news behind the current tweets
So they thought all along Pedro was going to Chelsea but it's Woodie's fault we did not sign him?
Agree with most of your post. However don't forget that many agents ans clubs use certain media houses as a mouthpiece. Take Castles and Mendes for example. Or Ballague and RM. So they get fed info directly. You essentially get 3 kinds of stories. Pure BS, Possibly BS and Solid info. The key is unravelling which has solid info and which is possible BS. The Pure BS is easy to spot.