Transfer Tweets - Summer 2015 | Stop Spamming - Discussion Should Relate to Tweets

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sounds like City's Otamendi deal was screwed up by Mangala refusing to go to Valencia, tehe.

Would much rather pay £35m for Laporte or Stones than Otamendi, even if they're a bigger risk, just because of the age gaps and the potential there.
Superdeporte reporting that they've come to an agreement for €45 million on Otamendi.
 
They'll have too if they want him. I seem to remember a year ago Mourinho being quite critical of the amount we paid for Shaw, saying paying that much would have killed the spirit in their dressing room or something along those lines.

Ironic now that they're going to need to pay more for someone just a year older.

Jose changes his tune that many times he doesn't know what he's whistling. I remember him moaning about diving and time wasting! Yet Porto and Inter Milan were experts at this under him. It's getting to the point nobody takes what he says seriously, just like last time in England everybody will get fed up of him and he will leave for a new league.
 
So again I ask how City can spend like this? Over £100m spent on an already super expensive squad. And that's before they buy De Bruyne for another £50m.

Why don't Chelsea, United, Arsenal, PSG etc just go mad and spend freely if FFP is now pretty much a non-factor?
 
So again I ask how City can spend like this? Over £100m spent on an already super expensive squad. And that's before they buy De Bruyne for another £50m.

Why don't Chelsea, United, Arsenal, PSG etc just go mad and spend freely if FFP is now pretty much a non-factor?

Because ffp is still a factor and if they are not careful they will regret it.
 
So again I ask how City can spend like this? Over £100m spent on an already super expensive squad. And that's before they buy De Bruyne for another £50m.

Why don't Chelsea, United, Arsenal, PSG etc just go mad and spend freely if FFP is now pretty much a non-factor?

I'm asking this as well. No matter how you look at it, it's taking the piss really.
 
6542b6de7d32b1dd999f0c50adb774d5_crop_north.
 
Because ffp is still a factor and if they are not careful they will regret it.
Do City look like they care? They're a club who were actually penalized for infringement and they're spending absurd amounts. Clearly they don't feel like anything will happen to them.
 
So again I ask how City can spend like this? Over £100m spent on an already super expensive squad. And that's before they buy De Bruyne for another £50m.

Why don't Chelsea, United, Arsenal, PSG etc just go mad and spend freely if FFP is now pretty much a non-factor?
It's simple, they sell out their ground every week (even when they're not playing at home) they have massive sponsorships thanks to their World class commercial team. They've won the Champions League three times in the last five years and celebrated such a triumph by placing three stars above their badge.
 
Do City look like they care? They're a club who were actually penalized for infringement and they're spending absurd amounts. Clearly they don't feel like anything will happen to them.

Until something happens to them, I think that they interpreted the lift of the bans as an encouragement to spend, like PSG. But in the agreement they signed in 2014, it was stipulated that the ban could be lifted if they clean their finances, which was the case for both.
 
So again I ask how City can spend like this? Over £100m spent on an already super expensive squad. And that's before they buy De Bruyne for another £50m.

Why don't Chelsea, United, Arsenal, PSG etc just go mad and spend freely if FFP is now pretty much a non-factor?

We're spending what we can afford to spend. We'll comply with FFP regulations this season.
 
So again I ask how City can spend like this? Over £100m spent on an already super expensive squad. And that's before they buy De Bruyne for another £50m.

Why don't Chelsea, United, Arsenal, PSG etc just go mad and spend freely if FFP is now pretty much a non-factor?
We did last year and it didn't turn out great. This year we've signed players we need and by all accounts are prepared to break the bank for Müller, just that Bayern won't sell him.
 
So again I ask how City can spend like this? Over £100m spent on an already super expensive squad. And that's before they buy De Bruyne for another £50m.

Why don't Chelsea, United, Arsenal, PSG etc just go mad and spend freely if FFP is now pretty much a non-factor?

Because they haven't spent 100m, that's how. Sterling's fee was with a bunch of add ons, Valencia still owe City money for Negredo - I wouldn't be surprised if City wrote off the money for Negredo and added it as part of the fee for Otamendi.
 
Sky News repeating what Sky Sports have said.


Pedro agreed terms with us. Ballbag has already said this a million times.
 
So again I ask how City can spend like this? Over £100m spent on an already super expensive squad. And that's before they buy De Bruyne for another £50m.

Why don't Chelsea, United, Arsenal, PSG etc just go mad and spend freely if FFP is now pretty much a non-factor?

Because your team and my team both have pathetic sponsorship deals, and we're not as big as the massive club that is Mancheter City with their sold-out stadium and totally legitimate sponsors such as Not-Sheik Investments and Not-Sheik Inc.
 
They'll have too if they want him. I seem to remember a year ago Mourinho being quite critical of the amount we paid for Shaw, saying paying that much would have killed the spirit in their dressing room or something along those lines.

Ironic now that they're going to need to pay more for someone just a year older.

Was talking about wages rather than transfer fee. Stones won't be on what shaw is.
 
So again I ask how City can spend like this? Over £100m spent on an already super expensive squad. And that's before they buy De Bruyne for another £50m.

Why don't Chelsea, United, Arsenal, PSG etc just go mad and spend freely if FFP is now pretty much a non-factor?

Ffp restrictions been lifted.
 
Because your team and my team both have pathetic sponsorship deals, and we're not as big as the massive club that is Mancheter City with their sold-out stadium and totally legitimate sponsors such as Not-Sheik Investments and Not-Sheik Inc.

United get £75m a year from Adidas for kit sponsorship alone. Etihad pay City £40m a year and that covers plenty more than just kit.
 
Why don't Chelsea, United, Arsenal, PSG etc just go mad and spend freely if FFP is now pretty much a non-factor?

United and Arsenal can't just go mad because they are spending their own generated money, so there's a natural limit there - go beyond that and they'd need to take on debt which will eventually have to be paid back. City, Chelsea and PSG have no such limit as it's their owners' money being spent, and they are all multi-billionaires playing games in a sport where even the biggest real clubs don't spend more than ~£150m in a summer.

FFP failed when UEFA accepted the sponsorship shams that City and PSG invented to make their figures look better - if UEFA had taken a strong hand with them then I'd guess the FFP position of both clubs would be very different.
 
United and Arsenal can't just go mad because they are spending their own generated money, so there's a natural limit there - go beyond that and they'd need to take on debt which will eventually have to be paid back. City, Chelsea and PSG have no such limit as it's their owners' money being spent, and they are all multi-billionaires playing games in a sport where even the biggest real clubs don't spend more than ~£150m in a summer.

FFP failed when UEFA accepted the sponsorship shams that City and PSG invented to make their figures look better - if UEFA had taken a strong hand with them then I'd guess the FFP position of both clubs would be very different.
it didn't fail with PSG and City at all. FFP was brought in to stop clubs spending more they they have and getting into massive trouble financially. There's no chance of that with City and PSG.
 
Because your team and my team both have pathetic sponsorship deals, and we're not as big as the massive club that is Mancheter City with their sold-out stadium and totally legitimate sponsors such as Not-Sheik Investments and Not-Sheik Inc.
What were you doing the day we announced the Adidas deal?
 
He's a Mendes client now and supposedly they don't do business with him. Someone said he has just signed to Adidas as well.

Not sure what we're like with Mendes anymore either, with DDG going and us not moving on Otamendi, we may be cutting ties with him?
 
I can't see De Gea leaving now. United would look like the biggest mugs in the world.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.