Truedevil
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 25, 2013
- Messages
- 3,405
If you mean me, I already said I've watched him more than that. And he wasn't good.The idea of Cillessen being not good enough just on the basis of the WC(where he was actually pretty good) is very stupid.
Ba moved to China? What a waste of a career after leaving Newcastle.
Agreed, NUQDo not want.
It is the most stupid thing I have read here, considering that he was very good (to not say excellent) in World Cup. I haven't seen him much for Ajax but considering that he waschosen their best keeper, it looks that he has had a very good season.The idea of Cillessen being not good enough just on the basis of the WC(where he was actually pretty good) is very stupid.
It is the most stupid thing I have read here, considering that he was very good (to not say excellent) in World Cup. I haven't seen him much for Ajax but considering that he waschosen their best keeper, it looks that he has had a very good season.
On other words, people who say that he is shit don't have a clue what they're saying.
Lacazette would cost less than £32m with how weak the Euro is. Unless you plan to play like the old Stoke a player like Benteke would be useless.
Medical check, could be presented today.
I don't really mind what player we get if he produces results but surely our aspirations should be higher than Benteke. I know it's wishful thinking in the current market with the lack of apparent top quality strikers but we need to have someone on the level of what van Nistelrooy used to do for us. Every top team has that kind of striker.And if we want to play our current system then we need a number nine which I don't think Lacazette is.
For me the GK situation is as simple as ABC. "Anyone But Cillessen"
Give me Navas, Valdes, Lindegaard, the fat chick in row G of the Stetford end. Just please for all that is Holy do not sign that piece of crap Cillessen
Every match of the World Cup. Maybe 7 or so times for Holland since. Here and there for Ajax. Quite a lot. He is shit.
If you mean me, I already said I've watched him more than that. And he wasn't good.
Medical would be at Carrington, not OT.
Yes, of course. I think the journalists following Schweinsteiger here are just taking the opportunity to look around while they wait for him to complete the medical.Medical would be at Carrington, not OT.
I don't really mind what player we get if he produces results but surely our aspirations should be higher than Benteke. I know it's wishful thinking in the current market with the lack of apparent top quality strikers but we need to have someone on the level of what van Nistelrooy used to do for us. Every top team has that kind of striker.
I don't really mind what player we get if he produces results but surely our aspirations should be higher than Benteke. I know it's wishful thinking in the current market with the lack of apparent top quality strikers but we need to have someone on the level of what van Nistelrooy used to do for us. Every top team has that kind of striker.
Medical check, could be presented today.
Otamendi it is then it would seem
Otamendi it is then it would seem
Even Sterling has went on tour with the Scousers...
Doesn't mean a single thing. Unless you thought Ramos/DDG deals were going to be somehow tied up yesterday.
So Sterling to City followed by Benteke to Liverpool and Austin to Villa - not sure how that affects us?Sterling deal could kickstart the market and a little chain. Benteke, Austin maybe even Lacazette deals could follow to wherever they end up. Could have implications for us
Gives us a free run at Lacazette?So Sterling to City followed by Benteke to Liverpool - not sure how that affects us?
Would be nice!Gives us a free run at Lacazette?
Sterling deal could kickstart the market and a little chain. Benteke, Austin maybe even Lacazette deals could follow to wherever they end up. Could have implications for us
Otamendi it is then it would seem
Medical check, could be presented today.
Really? Damn.That's not Bastian..