Transfer Tweets - Summer 2015 | Stop Spamming - Discussion Should Relate to Tweets

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh Woody, look what you have done to us..

From hoping to be transfer muppets and rejoice new signings.. You have pushed us to Nipple Flashing!! :lol::p
 
Señor said:
Nail on head. Both are better than what we've got (considering Rafa is a crock), but why would people want Coleman if they sniffed at signing Clyne? There's not much between them at all and one will cost double what the other cost. His nationality might come into it with some.
Click to expand...

I can think of a few reasons:

1. If you're looking for an attack focused fullback then Coleman is a better bet than the more solid but less gung-ho Clyne.
2. If you're looking to bring in an older player near their prime for an instant boost then Coleman makes sense. Neither Otamendi nor Ramos are that young either, maybe we want players near their peak going straight in to defence.
3. Clyne was our initial choice but he (or his representatives) did something to put us off.
4. We're not interested in Coleman at all and this is ESPN linking us with an obvious option just cuz.
 
Solius said:
Get in. Hope it's true.
Click to expand...

united-colioema-171x300.png
 
sullydnl said:
I can think of a few reasons:

1. If you're looking for an attack focused fullback then Coleman is a better bet than the more solid but less gung-ho Clyne.
2. If you're looking to bring in an older player near their prime for an instant boost then Coleman makes sense. Neither Otamendi nor Ramos are that young either, maybe we want players near their peak going straight in to defence.
3. Clyne was our initial choice but he (or his representatives) did something to put us off.
4. We're not interested in Coleman at all and this is ESPN linking us with an obvious option just cuz.
Click to expand...

Coleman would have been targeted by Moyes if not Fergie. Def would be on our list.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.