Transfer Tweets - Summer 2015 | Stop Spamming - Discussion Should Relate to Tweets

Status
Not open for further replies.
Any chance of getting back to the tweets. There's a thread for Ramos. I usually only have to spend 15 minutes checking the days transfer fabrications. All these repetitive posts about a ridiculous story are making it much harder.
 
Any chance of getting back to the tweets. There's a thread for Ramos. I usually only have to spend 15 minutes checking the days transfer fabrications. All these repetitive posts about a ridiculous story are making it much harder.

There is that new transfer tweet section btw, I find that handy when this thread gets swamped.
 
Pique was maybe the best defender in the world this season. Boateng is also world class so I don't see how it would be throwiing money down the gutter..
If Pique was the best defender, God how bad is defending nowadays! He made mistakes every time I saw Barca play. Boateng is nowhere near world class. But maybe good defenders are so few and far between now that Boateng passes for one.
 
You do realise its possible to do more than one thing at once right? Its not like ed has sent an email to real over ramos and now has to just sit there with his thumb up his arse waiting for a reply before he can do anything else.

Probably stretching it for Perez
 
I think you'll find it's us bullying them now. They were cocky about getting DDG done simply and cheaply, but we're having none of it.

If we extract Ramos from them, who is Mr Real, it'd be an incredible bit of gamesmanship.

Really? Madrid have us by the balls on this and I am not going to close my eyes to that. If we pay them 30 mil + DDG (effectively 50-60 million) for Ramos, I doubt we have got anywhere close to the best deal. Madrid would be laughing all the way.
 
Morning Paper : Utd to spend 150m on players
Lunchtime : utd close to X player
evening : feck all
repeat
this is getting really annoying, 200 pages on this thing now and nothing happening.
 
Really? Madrid have us by the balls on this and I am not going to close my eyes to that. If we pay them 30 mil + DDG (effectively 50-60 million) for Ramos, I doubt we have got anywhere close to the best deal. Madrid would be laughing all the way.
To be fair, Marca made up EUR30m, which is about GBP21m, so if you value De GEa (with 1 yr contract) at 20-25m, the Ramos price is expensive but not excessive.
 
To be fair, Marca made up EUR30m, which is about GBP21m, so if you value De GEa (with 1 yr contract) at 20-25m, the Ramos price is expensive but not excessive.

£25m for DDG
£21m on top of that
= £46m for Ramos

I think that is rather excessive considering we are talking about a defender an not a striker or attacking midfielder plus the fact that he is already 29 years old and will not be of use for us for a long time and will have no resale value at the end of his contract. In fact I think it is very excessive.

I'd pay £35m maximum for somebody like Ramos that means
DDG + £10m

And I think that would be a more than generous offer from our side (should be the absolutle maximum limit we should ever consider offering).
 
I think the idea that defenders should not cost that much is a pretty old fashioned one, all depends on how desperate you are and what is there in the market in terms of quality defenders.
 
I think the idea that defenders should not cost that much is a pretty old fashioned one, all depends on how desperate you are and what is there in the market in terms of quality defenders.

If you look at the record transfer fees it takes until the 10th place until you find a defender (David Luiz for £50m) and we all know that was a fishy transfer. If you look further it takes until the 25th place to find an actual sensible transfer for a defender which is Ferdinand for £30m.

So it is not an old fashioned idea it is just a fact that defenders don't go for as much as attacker and attacking midfielders.

Even if you forget for a moment that we are talking about a defender here there is still the fact that he is 29 years old turning 30 next year.

If you go down that list it takes a very long time before you find a player worthy of such an investment that is in that age category. The first one I find is David Villa to Barca on place 46 for £34.5m and he was only 28 at the time not 29. It than basically goes to place 79 where we find RVP for £24m in that age category.

So yea
1 He is a defender
2 He is turning 30 this year

Looking at the market that leads to:

3 No fecking way is he worth £46.5m !!!!!!

(The list is made on historic exchange rates the £30m for ferdinand was €44.8m which is more than the £34.5m for Villa at the time which was only €39.8m)
 
£25m for DDG
£21m on top of that
= £46m for Ramos

I think that is rather excessive considering we are talking about a defender an not a striker or attacking midfielder plus the fact that he is already 29 years old and will not be of use for us for a long time and will have no resale value at the end of his contract. In fact I think it is very excessive.

I'd pay £35m maximum for somebody like Ramos that means
DDG + £10m

And I think that would be a more than generous offer from our side (should be the absolutle maximum limit we should ever consider offering).

De Gea is only moving to Real. We don't have much leverage. Getting a player off them is one way we can come out with a positive.
 
Ramos isn't a nothing player but he is not worth £50m...

Why does it always have to black or white ? And why can nobody understand that we need to stop investing so much money in players that are almost 30 years old ?

Ramos approaches the last years of his career
De Gea is one of the best goalkeepers in the world and has atleast 10 more top years ahead of him
But somehow everybody seems to think we'd e doing a great deal by not only swapping thm but also paying another €30m on top of it...

I don't know why we should accept Reals low valuation of De Gea he is certainly worth more than 20m even with his contract running down. They paid 30 million for Kroos with his contract running down I don't see why they should pay a penny less than that in fact more because De Gea is far more important to us than Kroos was to Bayern.

And it isn't about the numbers but we really need to stop accepting every lowball offer that is thrown our way and keep on paying through our nose ourselves. It is time we need to start showing some teeth in these negotiations. I'am sure if De Gea was at Chelsea in this situation they'd somehow manage to get Real Madrid pay cash + Ramos to get De Gea but we are somehow happy with letting him go for peanuts and paying through our noses to get Ramos involved in the deal just so we don't lose face. We have the worst negotiators on the planet if this goes through.

Perez must be laughing his ass off pulling our pants down every year. He doesn't even need to pull it down himself anymore we just don't bother to wear pants anymore to negotiations...

He hasn't left for RM yet. Do you want to arrest people for crimes they will commit in the future? Please go and watch Minority Report instead.
 
Ok if your basic point is that the transfer fee of a player is not relevant than I think we are done talking.

Glad we could come to some arrangement.

Now if you can make the same arrangement with this forum as a whole we can put this silliness aside.
 
He hasn't left for RM yet. Do you want to arrest people for crimes they will commit in the future? Please go and watch Minority Report instead.

Jezus obviously it is hyphotetical, if you'd bother to read it than you clearly see the phrase if it goes through...

Which I think is quite implicit in a thread where we are discussing rumours. :rolleyes:
 
Glad we could come to some arrangement.

Now if you can make the same arrangement with this forum as a whole we can put this silliness aside.

Well I don't think the entire forum shares your basic point about transfer fees not being relevant. In fact I know they don't because else people wouldn't have been discussing them for years now.

So no
 
De Gea is only moving to Real. We don't have much leverage. Getting a player off them is one way we can come out with a positive.

We have the leverage that we can keep him and I'd consider it only a positive to come out of this with one of their players if we don't have to pay silly money for that player.
 
We have the leverage that we can keep him and I'd consider it only a positive to come out of this with one of their players if we don't have to pay silly money for that player.

We cant keep him. Getting one of their better players is a good thing. We aren't paying that much. £50 million for a top CB when we need to step up our first team is a step we need to take if needs be.
 
£25m for DDG
£21m on top of that
= £46m for Ramos

I think that is rather excessive considering we are talking about a defender an not a striker or attacking midfielder plus the fact that he is already 29 years old and will not be of use for us for a long time and will have no resale value at the end of his contract. In fact I think it is very excessive.

I'd pay £35m maximum for somebody like Ramos that means
DDG + £10m

And I think that would be a more than generous offer from our side (should be the absolutle maximum limit we should ever consider offering).
The market has take a significant jump this summer with the new TV deal. If people are happy to pay 36m for Otamendi who's had ONE good season in Europe, I don't see 46m for Ramos, who by all accounts is one of the very best in the world, being excessive.
 
We cant keep him. Getting one of their better players is a good thing. We aren't paying that much. £50 million for a top CB when we need to step up our first team is a step we need to take if needs be.

It is £50m for a 29 year old top CB. That is silly money for a player in that age cat, even more silly than the money PSG paid for David Luiz.

Didn't anybody tell you that we can keep him by just saying no to Real Madrid ? He still has a contract you know, a legal binding document that he has to play for us for another year. So it certainly isn't impossible.
 
The market has take a significant jump this summer with the new TV deal. If people are happy to pay 36m for Otamendi who's had ONE good season in Europe, I don't see 46m for Ramos, who by all accounts is one of the very best in the world, being excessive.

I don't think anybody is happy with £36m for Otamendi but it is his release clause. I doubt we couldn't reach some sort of agreement with Valencia to get him for cheaper than that. Anyway much rather have Otamendi who is younger even if it is for £36m.
 


Sport alleges City would discount the Negredo money owed by Valencia as part of any deal but it was said at the time we signed Bony that the Negredo transfer fee was allowed by UEFA to count for the 14/15 season, allowing us to sign Bony without any worries about breaching FFP, so I'd be sceptical of our ability to discount that transfer fee by arranging a deal for Otamendi without knowing all the facts.
 
It is £50m for a 29 year old top CB. That is silly money for a player in that age cat, even more silly than the money PSG paid for David Luiz.

Didn't anybody tell you that we can keep him by just saying no to Real Madrid ? He still has a contract you know, a legal binding document that he has to play for us for another year. So it certainly isn't impossible.

We're not going to keep him. It's not happening. We can only sell him to Real. We can use this opportunity to get one of their players and that's what it looks like we're trying to do.
 
We're not going to keep him. It's not happening. We can only sell him to Real. We can use this opportunity to get one of their players and that's what it looks like we're trying to do.

I'am just saying that keeping him is a valid possibility also it isn't much of an opportunity to sign Ramos when it involves us paying silly money.

Real would never consider it if Ramos wouldn't want to leave and if he wants to leave we could always try and sign him even without the De Gea deal. So in fact it is not an opportunity at all.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.