- Joined
- Apr 26, 2015
- Messages
- 1,331
He would cost the difference to loan so don’t worry about it. It may be beneficial to us if he plays well.All a loan does is run down his transfer fee.
Buy him or F**k off WestHam
He would cost the difference to loan so don’t worry about it. It may be beneficial to us if he plays well.All a loan does is run down his transfer fee.
Buy him or F**k off WestHam
Yeah allowing a loan to a club who just pocketed £105m would be bad business. He's better in the squad than a loan as pathetic as that.Loaning senior players is fine when they have no value at all, like Telles or Baily. But Maguire can still be a useful backup and he's an England international. If west ham can't afford to pay a reasonable fee or don't want to then feck them, we should find a club willing to pay or keep him
Loaning him out and Harry playing well means more suitors. Keeping him here when he won't play is just moronic. Obviously I would want a transfer fee, but Harry is a laughing stock and I am just perplexed that posters here think we'll get 40 million for him. He's also 30 years of age.Yeah allowing a loan to a club who just pocketed £105m would be bad business. He's better in the squad than a loan as pathetic as that.
He will play though, unless we sign another defender, which won't happen unless he's sold. He featured in 50% of all our matches last seasonLoaning him out and Harry playing well means more suitors. Keeping him here when he won't play is just moronic.
He will play. He won't play 40 games, but unless he's sold we can't buy anyone for the position anyway.Loaning him out and Harry playing well means more suitors. Keeping him here when he won't play is just moronic. Obviously I would want a transfer fee, but Harry is a laughing stock and I am just perplexed that posters here think we'll get 40 million for him. He's also 30 years of age.
His wages with us are higher now is what they mean. I assume it's pretty high for West Ham to try and matchWest Ham aren't in the CL
they offered Rice 200k a week didn't they?His wages with us are higher now is what they mean. I assume it's pretty high for West Ham to try and match
We either sale or he stays as back up. We will be short in centre halves if we loan him without replacement.West Ham aren't in the CL
This assumes we’re paying Onana 25k more than Henderson? If DDG was on 375k?If we sell Henderson for 20m as mooted, and DDG has gone, we’ll have signed Onana for a net 23m and removed 350k p/wk net from the payroll. Can’t argue with that. Significant upgrade that will pay for itself within two years.
£20m for Henderson would be great business
I think its too low. We should be aiming for £30m.£20m for Henderson would be great business
I like how Romano has a profile pic of him on the phone. Really makes you think that this guy must be really busy and well connected.
He's the Atlanta airport of all the world's transfers that's whyI like how Romano keep himself relevant. He got the one’s following him and defend him and the one’s making fun of him. Genius.
I think its too low. We should be aiming for £30m.
He's on big wages, if he was on £50k a week think a higher fee would be expected.I think its too low. We should be aiming for £30m.