Transfer Tweets - 2021/22 | Check the OP for blacklisted sources before posting

Status
Not open for further replies.
Pogba could be a fantastic signing for City. It would be really interesting to see him play in a well organized team.
He won't be a fantastic signing for anyone. There is nothing special about him at all. His application will always let him down, and he'll never have that.
 
He won't be a fantastic signing for anyone. There is nothing special about him at all. His application will always let him down, and he'll never have that.

But application is also linked to motivation. And I think playing for the (champions) league title for City under a top tier coach like Pep could potentially unlock a level of motivation that people haven't seen in a while from Pogba.
 
But application is also linked to motivation. And I think playing for the (champions) league title for City under a top tier coach like Pep could potentially unlock a level of motivation that people haven't seen in a while from Pogba.
He’s too old now and it’s difficult to see how he’d work in a midfield with De Bruyne. Ability wise they are equal but there’s no question who the superior player is and who works harder. Then you also have Bernardo and Gundogan.
 
I def do not want to see Pogba at City. All the people saying he won't work etc, have you guys seen him play for France? He's been a massive disappointment for us no doubt and a lot if not most of it is his own fault due to having a weak mentality but under Pep he could potentially absolutely smash it. Hope he goes to PSG.
 
He’s too old now and it’s difficult to see how he’d work in a midfield with De Bruyne. Ability wise they are equal but there’s no question who the superior player is and who works harder. Then you also have Bernardo and Gundogan.

I read that Bernardo wants to leave, so I assume he'd be his replacement. He's just turned 29, so he should have like 3 good years left in him at least. People may not like it, but I can understand why he didn't really give a damn playing for top four at United, I think he could potentially be an entirely different player when competing for trophies under a coach he admires.
 
I was gutted when we let Tevez go to City. I won't be arsed if Pogba goes there. Shows what a disappointment he's been.
 
The Pogba link while probably legitimate sounds weak. No discussions just he's on a list of their midfield targets.
 
More on Rangnick's recent quotes:




On trying to bring in a new striker:
Obviously, there were some problems the team had at the end of November and as we all know, in the first couple of months, at least until end of January, we were improving, we were conceding fewer goals, we had a points average of 2.1 after the West Ham game. But then in that international break we lost, including Edinson Cavani, three players - long-term players - we lost three strikers and we had problems to score goals and find our balance, this is what happened.

Maybe - I still believe - we should have tried, in those 48 hours, and I think the board meanwhile sees it the same way - they agreed with me - but they also spoke to the scouting department at the time, maybe we should have signed, tried to sign, a player in those 48 hours once we knew Mason wouldn't be available, once we knew that Anthony Martial had already left on loan. We were at least already aware Edinson Cavani might not be available for eight out of 10 games but, as I said, we didn't. Maybe I should have pushed even more in order to get this additional striker. But, as I said, we didn't.

On why he didn't push for a new striker:
Because the answer at the time was no, there is no player on the market who would really help us. There were a few! [Luis] Diaz, who is now at Liverpool, [Julian] Alvarez,su who will be at Manchester City in the summer, [Dusan] Vlahovic, who at the time was still with Fiorentina. So those are just three of them that come across my mind now. I came back after the fourth day [off in January]. We had four days off at the time. I think it was a Sunday. I was informed about the issues around Mason Greenwood and obviously Anthony Martial had already left, and then I was aware that within four days we had some strikers missing and that it might make sense [to buy].

We were still in three competitions: the FA Cup, the Champions League, at the time were fourth in the league. I spoke to the board and told them, ‘shouldn’t we at least speak and analyse and find if we can at least get a player, on loan or a permanent deal?' In the end, the answer was no. Maybe they didn’t want to do any winter [business]. It doesn’t matter, the answer was no. I spoke to the board.

I don’t know [if we could have signed one of them]. But as I said, maybe we should have at least internally discussed it. It might be necessary and important. I still believe we should have at least tried. If we would have found and been able within 48 hours [to sign a player], it would have been short notice anyway. But still, 48 hours is 48 hours, it might have been at least worth to try and internally discuss it. But we didn’t. It was not done. In the end, since West Ham we lost, including Edinson, two-and-a-half, almost three players since then, three strikers. This also had an affect on our goalscoring ratio.
 
Yeah the failure to act after the Greenwood situation signalled to me that the club had given up on this season. We just didn’t have enough firepower to compete. It’s frustrating as 1 new player in attack probably would’ve seen us finish in the top 4 but we’ve been extremely tentative in the transfer market for years so it’s not surprising.
 
Hadn’t they all been signed before his arrest? It was one day prior to deadline day.
They way his quotes suggest not but even if that was the case, I highly doubt we'd be able to hijack those moves at such short notice. Transfers to top clubs at that too, hardly jumping in and grabbing a Southampton signing.
 
They way his quotes suggest not but even if that was the case, I highly doubt we'd be able to hijack those moves at such short notice. Transfers to top clubs at that too, hardly jumping in and grabbing a Southampton signing.
I feel like he mentioned those names as examples of players who moved on in January. The point may have been to show that we could have obtained someone who'd have been good enough for us this season had we actually tried to look for more options.
 
So the board allowed the scouts to take the fall for their unwillingness to spend in January. It's just spin spin spin all the time with them. There were available players who could have helped us secure top 4 ffs.
 
They way his quotes suggest not but even if that was the case, I highly doubt we'd be able to hijack those moves at such short notice. Transfers to top clubs at that too, hardly jumping in and grabbing a Southampton signing.
And even if we did sign one of those players, I very much doubt it would've made much of a difference. It seems the morale in the squad fell to a all time low, and Rangnick didn't help himself by bringing in a coach (Armas) who seemed out of his depth at the required level.
 
So the board allowed the scouts to take the fall for their unwillingness to spend in January. It's just spin spin spin all the time with them. There were available players who could have helped us secure top 4 ffs.
Even if we’d overpaid, CL qualification makes up for it and more importantly, would’ve made Ten Hags job easier as more likely to get players in Summer with CL place.

Even an expensive 6 month loan with an option (that we could say “thanks, no”) to would’ve been a good punt.

Without CL, more likely to miss out on best options or have to overpay wages, some thing that’s already an issue.

Possibly cost us/Ten Hag a season or more in turning things around. Had to be worth a go.
 
I feel like he mentioned those names as examples of players who moved on in January. The point may have been to show that we could have obtained someone who'd have been good enough for us this season had we actually tried to look for more options.

Without hindsight, it would have been pointless to be fair though at that time (working on it through January). Especially the calibre/cost of those Ralf named... Why look for more options when our forward line was Ronaldo, Cavani, Greenwood, Rashford, Sancho?

Definitely should have at least tried for a loan signing though as soon as the Greenwood news broke.
 
Without hindsight, it would have been pointless to be fair though at that time (working on it through January). Especially the calibre/cost of those Ralf named... Why look for more options when our forward line was Ronaldo, Cavani, Greenwood, Rashford, Sancho?

Definitely should have at least tried for a loan signing though as soon as the Greenwood news broke.
Let's not forget about United loaning Martial out. That also played a part, so Cavani remaining fit was critical for us. Of course, that didn't happen, and that's where we we really got in trouble. I think that's where Rangnick regrets not pushing this matter further, but that's him speaking in hindsight, anyways.
 


Cue all the backtracking and hypocrisy from City fans from the last 6 years now that Pogba is touted as on his way there. I hope he ends up being another Grealish if he does go there.
 
So the board allowed the scouts to take the fall for their unwillingness to spend in January. It's just spin spin spin all the time with them. There were available players who could have helped us secure top 4 ffs.
Difference being Woodward and Judge were still in situ til January. Now it’s Arnold and Murtough. Let’s judge them separately on their own record, not prejudge based on what’s gone before.
 
He won't be a fantastic signing for anyone. There is nothing special about him at all. His application will always let him down, and he'll never have that.
Then you don't really understand coaching. If it was just about personal application Michael Jordan wouldn't have needed Phil Jackson and the triangle offense (which reduced his scoring numbers), or the Lakers with Kobe and Shaq. Denis Rodman was basically unmanageable save his time with the Pistons and under Phil in Chicago. The great coaches can convince players that personal sacrifice is what is required for the journey to be successful.

Pogba knows deep down that he hasn't improved in the way he would have liked over the last 6 years, and coaching/utilization has a big part in that. Paul's probably just one of those super talented players who needs to be in a complimentary system that allows him to play his best. And that's a legitimate criticism. In that way, yes, he is a luxury player but properly deployed he can be devastatingly decisive. All players can be criticized but United's issue has been an epic systems failure.

United hit an iceberg a long time ago. The greatest captain isn't going to be able to do much of anything. Why couldn't Varane significantly improve the defense? It just doesn't work that way.
 

Isnt it funny how weirdos like Sam Lee always report that theyd "heard X Y and Z about Player A" after the story hits the press elsewhere.

Never seem to report this stuff before anyone else... strange, eh
 
Then you don't really understand coaching. If it was just about personal application Michael Jordan wouldn't have needed Phil Jackson and the triangle offense (which reduced his scoring numbers), or the Lakers with Kobe and Shaq. Denis Rodman was basically unmanageable save his time with the Pistons and under Phil in Chicago. The great coaches can convince players that personal sacrifice is what is required for the journey to be successful.

Pogba knows deep down that he hasn't improved in the way he would have liked over the last 6 years, and coaching/utilization has a big part in that. Paul's probably just one of those super talented players who needs to be in a complimentary system that allows him to play his best. And that's a legitimate criticism. In that way, yes, he is a luxury player but properly deployed he can be devastatingly decisive. All players can be criticized but United's issue has been an epic systems failure.

United hit an iceberg a long time ago. The greatest captain isn't going to be able to do much of anything. Why couldn't Varane significantly improve the defense? It just doesn't work that way.

Pep won't put up with his injuries and then him going off to Dubai to recover. Pep won't put up with him not doing the hard yards and being suspect defensively. They had no interest when he was generally fit and healthy, the last few years he's a bit of a crock as per below he's been unavailable a lot.
https://www.transfermarkt.com/paul-pogba/verletzungen/spieler/122153
 


Summary:

  • £2.5B will be used to purchase the club.
  • £1.75B will be invested into the club, including (but not limited to):
    • Stamford Bridge
    • Academy
    • Women's team
    • Kingsmeadow (Chelsea Women's & U23's stadium)
    • Chelsea Foundation
 


Summary:

  • £2.5B will be used to purchase the club.
  • £1.75B will be invested into the club, including (but not limited to):
    • Stamford Bridge
    • Academy
    • Women's team
    • Kingsmeadow (Chelsea Women's & U23's stadium)
    • Chelsea Foundation


No more freeloading and artificially inflating the status of the club.
 


Summary:

  • £2.5B will be used to purchase the club.
  • £1.75B will be invested into the club, including (but not limited to):
    • Stamford Bridge
    • Academy
    • Women's team
    • Kingsmeadow (Chelsea Women's & U23's stadium)
    • Chelsea Foundation

What's this investment they speak of?
 
Would pogba even be a regular for city? I really don't see him as a better option than what they have, at best he would be fernandinho replacement but that would mean city would be hugely defensively frail with him as the defensive midfielder.

also haaland and pogba at the same club... that is two very big egos to manage which goes against what city have built their success on in terms of player recruitment.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.