Giggsyking
Full Member
- Joined
- Aug 24, 2013
- Messages
- 9,759
Source:
Can we give it a try?
Source:
Haha so butthurt about our own player doing well. I know what you are.Apart from that time he scored 2 non penalty goals in 3 months. But yes other than that every week.
Gravenberch really wants Bayern Munich, so unless he has a change of heart, we won't have any luck in getting him.Can we give it a try?
Bernardo Silva still wants to leave England. He is fine at City, but wants a change and would be delighted to come to Barça.
Xavi wants another top interior player who can accompany Pedri and has proven experience.
Mendes is his agent. De Jong, possible bargaining chip
It is true that Manchester City is negotiating the renewal of Pep Guardiola until 2025. The parties are talking.
The Uruguayan has a proposal to extend 1 more season at Atletico Madrid.
Suarez right now is NOT considering his renewal due to Simeone's lack of confidence in the final stretch.
The player wants to play one more year in Europe, everything is open.
Source:
- Reminder: Roberto Mancini and Graham Potter are alternatives to Pochettino
- Levy was keen on paying £15M for Potter last summer, but Potter was happy enough to stay at Brighton.
Haven’t we learnt from Dalot?
In fairness, Inacio has eight times more first team appearances than Dalot has when we bought him.Haven’t we learnt from Dalot?
A lot of money for someone who hasn’t played muchIn fairness, Inacio has eight times more first team appearances than Dalot has when we bought him.
Bayern sure as fuk don't mind talking in the papers and press about other teams players and how much they want to come to Munich
Source:
They actually have footballing people negotiating the deals, that's the difference, we didn't when we signed VdB.How the feck they manage this kind of deals? 30M is a steal, yet they want to pay 17+6? What the actual feck. We bought Van de Beek for 40M
How the feck they manage this kind of deals? 30M is a steal, yet they want to pay 17+6? What the actual feck. We bought Van de Beek for 40M
Still Gravenberch is one of the most exciting young players in Europe, surely for that price (30M) many top clubs would be all over him?a) they identify targets with an exploitable contract situation (e.g. expiring in 2023)
b) they make sure the player only wants to join them
c) they act early(-ish)
d) they act from a position of "we'd like him, but we don't absolutely need him", which makes them less exploitable
Still Gravenberch is one of the most exciting young players in Europe, surely for that price (30M) many top clubs would be all over him?
Its depressing how other top clubs negotiate their deals and how stupid we are at it, everyone take us for a ride.
That's the way I see it, Gravenberch has one year left on his deal and wants Ajax to get a fee, so they're limited to what they can get without pissing off Gravenberch and Bayern.I don't really see how Gravenberch and Van de Beek are comparable in terms of the status they had when moving. It sure sounds right to me that Gravenberch would be significantly cheaper.
Van de Beek wasn't expensive either, really, given the performances he had to show; it's just baffling how poorly it has worked out.That's the way I see it, Gravenberch has one year left on his deal and wants Ajax to get a fee, so they're limited to what they can get without pissing off Gravenberch and Bayern.
Pretty perfect