#07
makes new threads with tweets in the OP
- Joined
- Oct 25, 2010
- Messages
- 23,885
I don't understand why we have not been able to extend Herrera's contract.
He has been among the most consistent performers in the post SAF era.
May be he demands higher wages? Whatever it is, he deserves a new contract.
Such a shame if he let him go for free while we extended contracts for players like Fellaini and Rojo.
I don't understand why we have not been able to extend Herrera's contract.
He has been among the most consistent performers in the post SAF era.
May be he demands higher wages? Whatever it is, he deserves a new contract.
Such a shame if he let him go for free while we extended contracts for players like Fellaini and Rojo.
I don't understand why we have not been able to extend Herrera's contract.
He has been among the most consistent performers in the post SAF era.
May be he demands higher wages? Whatever it is, he deserves a new contract.
Such a shame if he let him go for free while we extended contracts for players like Fellaini and Rojo.
I dont understand people saying this. Do you not realise that we overpay for absolutely everyone under Woodward?If he's asking for too much then we are right to refuse.
As others have said, contract lenght is a very possible issue.The club are a shambles with contracts, they really are. I think Herrera is overrated but definitely deserved priority regarding contracts over the chuckle brothers and even Shaw. He'll not be easy replaced if he does leave. When Herrera is at it, he gets the tempo going and we can pull out a huge result. I think he's always been in and out of the team unfortunately. He's had some great days but never a solid season of performances.
As others have said, contract lenght is a very possible issue.
I won't have a big problem with it if we replace him adequately.Slightly controversial here but I won’t blame the club if they are refusing to give him large wages on a long deal.
When Herrera’s legs go, there won’t be that much of a player left there.
Slightly controversial here but I won’t blame the club if they are refusing to give him large wages on a long deal.
When Herrera’s legs go, there won’t be that much of a player left there.
He is under contract so United can say no. Pogba was linked constantly to everything and everywhere last year too and will be in the future too. I would not be too worried about it, but of course everything is possible.What do you mean "United will not sell" If he wants to go there is nothing we could do. Did you say the same about Ronaldo when he was constantly linked away from the club?
Slightly controversial here but I won’t blame the club if they are refusing to give him large wages on a long deal.
When Herrera’s legs go, there won’t be that much of a player left there.
Slightly controversial here but I won’t blame the club if they are refusing to give him large wages on a long deal.
When Herrera’s legs go, there won’t be that much of a player left there.
Where did that 200k figure come out from?Agreed. Shame we didn’t extend his contract a while ago but at some point we just need to stop giving big, long contracts to everyone. We’d be mad to give Herrera 200k as good a character and a useful player he is.
Things is, what kind of salary we'll give to a new CM if we're going to buy one.It's not controversial at all. At some time we have to take the hard route and stop players fecking us using Sanchez card.
If Sanchez is the reference for every deal then we should accept that we fecked up signing him, let go player like Herrera, Mata and also try to offload Sanchez even if we have to pay some percentage of wages.
Things is, what kind of salary we'll give to a new CM if we're going to buy one.
Baffling that we're making a stand on Ander. Especially since Jones has renewed.Depends on the quality of the player.
Overall cost will obviously be more than the renewal of Herrera but just like Sanchez contract, it will have domino effect. We have to take stand at some point.
Baffling that we're making a stand on Ander. Especially since Jones has renewed.
Where is that 240 figure from. We shouldn't have renewed with Jones. I hope we're not haggling over some small figure with Ander. And I wouldnt be surprised if after letting him go we would overpay for somewhere else.No one knows what we are paying Jones. We used the same sort of logic when we signed Sanchez, look at the mess we ended up in.
I'm a big fan of Herrera but the decision we make now, there is a good chance it will bite us big time in the future, especially with so many contract renewals coming soon.
This has nothing to do with renewing average players like Jones who will be on low wages. If the rumored 240K is true then we have no choice but to let him go.
What kind of stand are we talking about here when we have average to shit players like Jones, who are not even fit and getting new contracts on 100k+ a week? I agree we need to put an end to it, but letting Herrera leave on a free isn't the way to do it.It's not controversial at all. At some time we have to take the hard route and stop players fecking us using Sanchez card.
If Sanchez is the reference for every deal then we should accept that we fecked up signing him, let go player like Herrera, Mata and also try to offload Sanchez even if we have to pay some percentage of wages.
Where is that 240 figure from. We shouldn't have renewed with Jones. I hope we're not haggling over some small figure with Ander. And I wouldnt be surprised if after letting him go we would overpay for somewhere else.
What kind of stand are we talking about here when we have average to shit players like Jones, who are not even fit and getting new contracts on 100k+ a week? I agree we need to put an end to it, but letting Herrera leave on a free isn't the way to do it.
What or who is Discomirro?That was reported before (think it was by Discomirro). Also don't think it's haggling over small figure, think Ducker reported that the difference is big.
I'm not saying we shouldn't renew him, I'm saying we shouldn't renew if the asking wages is very huge as it will have domino effect like Sanchez's deal had on other renewals.
What or who is Discomirro?
It is not, same as giving a new contract to a useless Phil Jones who earns the same as our starting midfielder Herrera most probably. My point was that the problem goes dipper. Jones, Mata, Lingard and others, they are all overpaid for the service they give.Kind of stand City took when they didn't match wages for sanchez or Jorginho?
If 240K is true then there is a good chance he will be in top 5-7 top earners in PL, it's not healthy for the club.
It is not, same as giving a new contract to a useless Phil Jones who earns the same as our starting midfielder Herrera most probably. My point was that the problem goes dipper. Jones, Mata, Lingard and others, they are all overpaid for the service they give.
I don't understand why we have not been able to extend Herrera's contract.
He has been among the most consistent performers in the post SAF era.
May be he demands higher wages? Whatever it is, he deserves a new contract.
Such a shame if he let him go for free while we extended contracts for players like Fellaini and Rojo.
I want to keep our best players and get rid of the useless ones. What I've seen from the rumors, Herrera supposedly agreed a 170k a week with PSG. Surely we can give him that, on a reasonable length that is.So you want us to repeat the same mistake and offer huge contract to Herrera which puts him in top 5-7 earners in the league? When exactly are we going to learn from past mistakes?
It was McDonnell. The (only) guy who reported Mourinho will be sacked after the Newcastle game. He knows feck all. Mirror is generally hot garbage anyway.Mirror reporter who is decent with Manutd news. After that Ducker reported that the difference in what ManUtd offered and what Herrera wants is huge.
So going back to my initial point, it's not controversial to say we shouldn't give large wages on long deal. We have enough examples like Sanchez, Rooney.