MiceOnMeth
Full Member
- Joined
- Jan 26, 2014
- Messages
- 2,738
He'd be warming the bench at all 3 of those clubs.He'd look great in Italy, league would really suit him. French league not that demanding either.
He'd be warming the bench at all 3 of those clubs.He'd look great in Italy, league would really suit him. French league not that demanding either.
We don't?Love Mata but it is time for him to go and become the main man somewhere else, and for United to give more chance to "yoof". I know Chong didn't have the brightest of debut, but United should take more risks in terms of young talents as their risk taking on the Galacticos didn't really work.
Didn't realise he was that good.
If Mata wants to stay and he accepts being a part-time player - of course we keep him. Realistically we will off-load 4-5 players in the summer, it will be good to keep some of our players. Regardless of what people think - we cant ditch 10 players at the same time.
Different source similar story
That was in the gossip column no? Wasn’t actually the BBC reporting it.BBC this morning announcing Barcelona has an interest in buying Mata.
Do it so we can get de Ligt. The more Barca spends, the less likely they spend a bunch on de Ligt.BBC this morning announcing Barcelona has an interest in buying Mata.
I don't understand some of you on here.
Do you expect every squad member to be a world class player?
How much do you think it is going to cost to replace him with another squad player of the same level?
Do you not think by spending money on his replacement it will reduce our available budget for other reinforcements?
Mata is a model professional who can add value to our squad, even as an option from the bench.
There is a lot of deadwood in our team which I agree we should get rid of, but I wouldn't be against the likes of Mata getting another 1/2 year contract.
This guy looks a like for like replacement for Herrera, he's very tenacious and aggressive in winning the ball back, very composed on the ball which gets him out of tights spots or being pressed and he looks quite creative going forward too. The problem we have is that we have a £52m midfielder on the bench who's also in the same mould and we have Perreira who's an academy graduate who's also the same kind of player, albeit not as good defensively. Neither are getting regular game time as our current midfield is playing brilliantly.
This summer is going to be interesting in who we sell, loan out and who we sign. Hopefully we make the right decisions as CM isn't a pressing issue but Matic does need replacing.
Based on bold part: I did say more, does not mean United dont or didnt take any risks. In recent years, the club or at least Ed tried the Galacticos route, and more failures than successes really.We don't?
So you want to offload 3 centre backs and leave us with ONE who is still finding his feet (not to mention that thing on his shoulders that’s meant to head the ball)If we really wanted to go for it we could offload Jones, Rojo, Young, Valencia, Lukaku, Sanchez, Mata, Fellaini, McTominay, Smalling, Fred, Darmian
That's 12 we could easily upgrade. I say easily the cost would be massive and also you can't have 22 world class stars.
From the above...Young is worthy of being backup for another year. Smalling is a great backup. Darmian is actually a pretty agile backup for the price and reasonably capable. Lukaku could still be very useful if we get a RW and frankly it might be hard to sell for enough to make an upgrade worth it.
McTominay might have something in training so might deserve benefit of the doubt. Fred is still new and relatively untested.
So yes you can make a case to keep half, but even then of that 12 how many would you rely on to give you more than a 6/10. A few there might give you the odd 7. I'm not sure any of them you would expect many 8+ performances. Frankly that is a lot of average and we should be looking for a bench that gives you about a 7/10 with one or two 8s.
I agree but looking at some videos on Barella (I know not the best gauge to base players on) he seems like he can be a destroyer too. As you mention he could be a great replacement for Matic but can also replace Herrera in his role if need be. The sticking point are that we have a vast choice of CMs with bright young CMs coming through also.I think Herrera is more of a destroyer midfielder than winning balls, I mean he has more interception than anyone in United sides and is one of the best players in Europe at interception under Ole. If anything, Ballera will replace Matic so Herrera can move to DM where he is easily best at it and Barella as a ball winner with Pogba focusing on playmakers, I think that is decent midfield that can adapt any from counter-attacking to possession based to fast buildup.
So you want to offload 3 centre backs and leave us with ONE who is still finding his feet (not to mention that thing on his shoulders that’s meant to head the ball)
Great thinking Batman
Did you literally read just the first paragraph and the stop.....
In the second paragraph I talked about easily upgrading. Then went on to say various of those could be justified to stay, I.e. cant upgrade 12 at once. The point is still we have plenty of average players that aren't good enough and it's not even a case of there being much risk replacing them. I'd expect most signings to do better.
I don't understand some of you on here.
Do you expect every squad member to be a world class player?
How much do you think it is going to cost to replace him with another squad player of the same level?
Do you not think by spending money on his replacement it will reduce our available budget for other reinforcements?
Mata is a model professional who can add value to our squad, even as an option from the bench.
There is a lot of deadwood in our team which I agree we should get rid of, but I wouldn't be against the likes of Mata getting another 1/2 year contract.
Exactly. Tap in of an answer. Well worked. Well done.We have a squad player to replace him. He's called Lingard.
We should buy a starter who actually has a big impact from the right side. Or if we have to keep the "inside player" that we've been playing since Sir Alex left (and with it our success) then someone who creates more than Mata and Lingard.
We have a squad player to replace him. He's called Lingard.
We should buy a starter who actually has a big impact from the right side. Or if we have to keep the "inside player" that we've been playing since Sir Alex left (and with it our success) then someone who creates more than Mata and Lingard.
We have a squad player to replace him. He's called Lingard.
We should buy a starter who actually has a big impact from the right side. Or if we have to keep the "inside player" that we've been playing since Sir Alex left (and with it our success) then someone who creates more than Mata and Lingard.
Mata, like Lingard, can play in a central position too, not just out wide.
It is Sanchez that needs to leave really as he is not on a salary befitting a squad player, nor is he performing like a key player.
Mata and Lingard provide a good amount of squad depth IMO.
Again, there are much better players for that position.
Sanchez has every chance of doing a better job than both Mata and Lingard under Ole.
Apart from Pogba, who is better than them in the central number 10 type role in our squad?
?
Why would it need to be someone from our squad?
If we want to buy a better right wing / AM than Lingard and Mata then one needs to leave.
Apart from Dalot who is a better right back in our squad than Ashley Young? But still I'd rather we got rid of him and had a better one.
I'm not sure if you saw my first post on the matter, but essentially I raised the question of how much it would cost to replace a squad player like Mata in today's market? £30 million?
Is it really worth it? Won't this impact our budget for other first team players?
This is the reason I believe that Sanchez needs to leave before the likes of Mata and/or Lingard. He has been here and year and is simply not performing. I don't think he can really have any excuses for his performances either.
He is on a huge salary and was purcahsed to be a first team player. The likes of Mata and Lingard have mainly had to play simply because Sanchez wasn't available.
Do you think if we replaced Sanchez with a better player, the likes of Mata would still get as much gametime? I personally don't. And that's where the problem is.
It makes more commercial sense to keep someone like Mata for another year or so in my opinion.
One team's 'deadwood' is another teams...
One team's 'deadwood' is another teams...