Doubt it. He's 25 soon and hasn't shown anything to suggest he'll make it here, don't think any manager coming in will change that. Should be sold to a lower half Prem side. A player more likely to interest LVG would be Powell.
He's been very poor player for us, not just this season. Only time when he looked remotely good was when he played with Anderson in midfield ( what the feck ). Then it was averageness at it's best. If he wasn't a homegrown, local player then he would get his ass ripped just like Anderson. His biggest highlight of recent must be that street dancing really.
Having said that, I wish him good luck if he's really about to leave and hope he does well wherever he goes.
Edit: euphemismed a little there because some people were losing their shit.
Good post.I think this is a very harsh and inaccurate assessment. I fully understand your reasoning, however. Cleverley is by no means a brilliant footballer, but every side needs squad players and that's the role that I'd want him to play next season. I disagree with your point about him only looking good next to Anderson. It can be debated for years which partner has seen the best out of him, but that doesn't mean he's not done well next to Carrick or whoever. Personally I would argue that his best partner was Carrick and that's largely down to the balance that's embedded between them. With Anderson, though they played attractive football, the defending from the pair was average at best and it contributed to our mediocre defending in 11/12. What should be mentioned is why he's gone from looking like a good player to someone who resembles a mediocre footballer, and I don't believe it has anything to do with who has partnered him. It's a mixture of lacking the ability to make a key contribution and the lack of short options available to him IMO.
Re Anderson: he's better than Cleverley on the ball, but IMO the reason he's received more criticism is because he's not fulfilled his potential. He's not improved on weak points such as defensive positioning whereas Cleverley has improved defensively from last season, for example. I personally think it's a myth that players like Welbeck and Cleverley receive less criticism because they're "local players". In his short time in the Premier League with us, he's had one promising season (don't know what else to label it), one good season, and one poor season. My opinion on Cleverley is simple. He's a good player, but he's not someone I'd want to see starting for us. If he showed the same form as the first half of 12/13 with a different partner (we need to replace Carrick) then why not, but currently he's mentally fragile. This is a good season for him to learn from and improve on weak points, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was sold. If he is sold to Everton, Martínez would probably get the best version of Cleverley, but I don't think that's solely down to the system they deploy. It would be down to less expectations and a manager who rates him at a high level mostly.
I have a feeling Cleverley will shine under Giggsy. I can imagine Scholes and Butt be giving him some great advice in training too.
I think a lot of these posts claiming they'd be sad to see him go, are because its Everton & Martinez that are after him. Same as when people get excited when we are interested in a young player and Arsenal are too. "Hmmm, if Wenger likes him, he must be good."
Let's face it, Cleverley isn't and never will be good enough for United.
I agree with this, but I also think our movement at times is extremely static and doesn't help our CM's one bit. It's no surprise we looked better with Nani in the team, either way. CM imo wasn't the main issue, it's our terrible wingers and our tactics of trying to put crosses into the box against teams that can knock em out all day long. Play it on the floor ffs.
The alternative argument is that both teams know that our wingers are so out of form, that they can allow our CM's to have room knowing that the wingers won't produce anything. Jones for example was continually in a position to cross the ball and the Chelsea CB's cleared everytime with ease. The same thing today.
It's easy to point the blame at the midfield, but if our wingers and forwards aren't moving and providing space then what exactly are they meant to do? Play a Gerrard Hollywood pass that may/may not come off? The one player that might be able to do that is left on the bench. The winger that imo would make things happen (Zaha) hasn't got a sniff. So therefore we're stuck with Young whos returning to fitness (and got unfair stick) and Giggs (who in a game of high pressure was pretty useless). We were basically relying on our fullbacks to do something.
It's shit tactics. I honestly haven't got a scoobies what our plan was. But this scapegoating of Cleverely is utter bullshit. It's Darren Fletcher all over again.
Even the best Creative Midfielders will struggle if there is no movement up top Cina. It's easy to say "sign this player", it's not that simple. The players have to make the runs to free up space for the CM's to be able to make the passes.
It's one area I think Cleverley does need to improve though, his positioning can at times be a bit crap. He's fine when the ball is in midfield, but he struggles to open himself up for the pass when the balls with the CB's.
I think Cleverley can be creative (as seen at the start of last season) but he's been told to sit in midfield which imo hampers his style. You're suggesting our play will improve if we sign a creative player to play alongside Carrick. I don't think it will because the issue is with the teams movement. We'll improve no doubt, but it's not a magic wand fix which the majority of the forum seems to think.
Fellaini for example will not solve this issue at all. But to throw shit at Cleverley and scapegoat him (not saying you are, but there are plenty who have been) is a bit laughable. It's exactly what happened when Fletcher broke through into the squad.
FYI, Hernandez is one of our best players when it comes to movement, second to Rooney imo. So it's no surprise we looked better with him in the team.
He's more disciplined but by doing that I think he's lost his edge somewhat. He's playing well though imo. Has a higher pass completion than Carrick this year. But it entirely depends on what job Dave has given him, if he's meant to be creating then he's not doing that great. But if he's meant to be disciplined and keeping the ball moving then he's doing very well.
Indeed, it's scary how similar it is.
I thought he was decent enough, played everything simple and kept the midfield ticking. I'd be interested to know if its instructions given to Cleverley to keep it all simple and play the percentages, or whether his confidence is just low.
To be fair, that Sandro goal was utter class. Can't really pin blame on Clev for that imo, just a very good goal.
I just think the way our team is setup and the tactics we're using is making most of our attacking players look shit. Only Rooney and perhaps Carrick have had a run of good form so far this season. Our other attacking players have all really played below their normal standards. It's worrying.
He's tired, as LR7 said, Toms played far too many games over a crammed Christmas schedule.
He's been rested for one game since the Newcastle game which was the CL game when he came on the pitch anyway. So that's, 9 games started and 1 sub appearance in a month.
He played his way into some form mid December, but imo the number of games have caught up with him. The problem for Cleverley is that he needs time and games and the right personal around him to perform at his best. In a team that's struggling with movement and confidence his game just doesn't work.
We just don't have anyone else available to fill the void with Jones being injured and Fletcher being slowly brought in to the squad. It's the one area we couldn't afford an injury crisis.
I have a feeling Tom thinks he's some kind of spanish flavor in the team, he should really take a hard look at himself because his season along with his interviews have been an embarrassment. Home grown and all that, but he should go if he doesn't show any sign of progress in the next couple of months.
They are also looking for a long term successor to Mikel Arteta and Wenger wants to bring in a powerful player with a physical presence in midfield.
Wenger is also keeping tabs on Manchester United’s Tom Cleverley who is a target for Everton this summer but his future is now unclear with a new manager set to come in at Old Trafford.
You have a feeling..... good on you mate...I have a feeling Tom thinks he's some kind of spanish flavor in the team, he should really take a hard look at himself because his season along with his interviews have been an embarrassment. Home grown and all that, but he should go if he doesn't show any sign of progress in the next couple of months.
Cleverley has stated in interviews that he views his style of play as Spanish. However he's only adopted the sideways passing, not the intelligent movement or incisive through balls.You have a feeling..... good on you mate...
You have a feeling..... good on you mate...
I think this is a very harsh and inaccurate assessment. I fully understand your reasoning, however. Cleverley is by no means a brilliant footballer, but every side needs squad players and that's the role that I'd want him to play next season. I disagree with your point about him only looking good next to Anderson. It can be debated for years which partner has seen the best out of him, but that doesn't mean he's not done well next to Carrick or whoever. Personally I would argue that his best partner was Carrick and that's largely down to the balance that's embedded between them. With Anderson, though they played attractive football, the defending from the pair was average at best and it contributed to our mediocre defending in 11/12. What should be mentioned is why he's gone from looking like a good player to someone who resembles a mediocre footballer, and I don't believe it has anything to do with who has partnered him. It's a mixture of lacking the ability to make a key contribution and the lack of short options available to him IMO.
Re Anderson: he's better than Cleverley on the ball, but IMO the reason he's received more criticism is because he's not fulfilled his potential. He's not improved on weak points such as defensive positioning whereas Cleverley has improved defensively from last season, for example. I personally think it's a myth that players like Welbeck and Cleverley receive less criticism because they're "local players". In his short time in the Premier League with us, he's had one promising season (don't know what else to label it), one good season, and one poor season. My opinion on Cleverley is simple. He's a good player, but he's not someone I'd want to see starting for us. If he showed the same form as the first half of 12/13 with a different partner (we need to replace Carrick) then why not, but currently he's mentally fragile. This is a good season for him to learn from and improve on weak points, but I wouldn't be surprised if he was sold. If he is sold to Everton, Martínez would probably get the best version of Cleverley, but I don't think that's solely down to the system they deploy. It would be down to less expectations and a manager who rates him at a high level mostly.
dont come. go to aussie instead pleaseI hope your countrymen are funnier, going there next year.
dont come. go to aussie instead please
If Everton want him then we should use the chance to get Barkley.
As if Everton would be willing to part with Barkley just to get a CM who isn't good enough to start for us.
Perhaps now, under proper player management and some discipline, he'll make it. We can only hope.I am laughed at when I claim he's technically one of our superior players, but just watch this video and tell me you cannot see bits of Scholes in him when he controls the ball on the turn to get into space.
I didn't mean it in that way, more that we could use the opening to get talks going, plus £25M and Cleverley would be a decent deal for them.
You'd take that if you were Everton chairman/manager would you?
I'd demand £40 million for Barkley. Once we cave, I'd offer £6 million for Cleverley
I am laughed at when I claim he's technically one of our superior players, but just watch this video and tell me you cannot see bits of Scholes in him when he controls the ball on the turn to get into space.
I am laughed at when I claim he's technically one of our superior players, but just watch this video and tell me you cannot see bits of Scholes in him when he controls the ball on the turn to get into space.
I think that Van Gaal won't be so eager to ship him out of the team. Pretty sure Cleverley will considerably improve after him, and while won't become ever a great player IMO, I expect that next season he'll be as good (or better) than in the previous season under Fergie.
Considering how you like Cleverley and adore United playing with wingers, you should be delighted if Van Gaal is chosen as our manager.