Sean_RedDevil
Twitter bot
He thought he has made it "Clevz in Bangkok"
Point being that this has been missing in Cleverley's game for quite some time now, and that our system is also to blame. I'm not saying he's a great player or anything as absurd as that. But the problem is deeper than his poor performances this season.
I'm not sure I'm on the same theme. It's similar, but it's not the same. My point is that we need to change the system to allow our players more comfort in the building up/defensive phases of play. This isn't suited to one player, and having a system being built around them. Under no circumstances should we just look at the system. Player performances have to be factored in.This seems to be a recurring theme in recent times. Our system is being blamed for Cleverly to Kagawa to Mata.
Cleverly is creative, but I dont think he is good enough to play a AM in a 4-2-3-1. He is not one you build a team on. And he has done nothing to deserve a system change.
Cleverley is not creative. He's a very average pass and move footballer. He finds a fairly simple pass, makes a run and looks to get it back. This is when he does well.
My point is that we need to change the system to allow our players more comfort in the building up/defensive phases of play. This isn't suited to one player, and having a system being built around them. Under no circumstances should we just look at the system. Player performances have to be factored in.
Yes he'd do better in a 433. However there is no question of him adapting to play in a 442. He simply doesn't have the mentality or skills to do so.The thing is he makes a pass and runs into a area where he cannot get the return. More like pass and move away footballer.
So, which system do you think will be good for Cleverly? With Kagawa/Mata/Rooney, an proper No.10 is beyond his reach, not that I'm sure he can perform in it. He is seen as a liability in a 2 man midfield. A 4-3-3 perhaps? I still think he needs to adapt his game to play in a 4-4-2 variation.
Yes he'd do better in a 433. However there is no question of him adapting to play in a 442. He simply doesn't have the mentality or skills to do so.
He's still a decent squad player to have I think. For a couple of years, until someone from the youth teams makes a step up I guess.
That's exactly it. I think he's going to better in a 4-3-3 because he's less exposed, but IMO a variation of a 4-4-2 is what I've wanted since the start of the season. If we see a variation of a 4-4-2, as opposed to this archaic style we're playing, then we'll improve - it's guaranteed. The system is acting as a barrier for a lot of players. We're not even utilising Rooney - arguably our best player - properly, but I've basically been saying the same the start of the season so I'll stop now.The thing is he makes a pass and runs into a area where he cannot get the return. More like pass and move away footballer.
So, which system do you think will be good for Cleverly? With Kagawa/Mata/Rooney, an proper No.10 is beyond his reach, not that I'm sure he can perform in it. He is seen as a liability in a 2 man midfield. A 4-3-3 perhaps? I still think he needs to adapt his game to play in a 4-4-2 variation.
I don't even think it is simply a 3 man or a 2 man midfield but just our general style of play. Carrick has sat really deep this season almost just in front of the defence and hardly moves. Rooney has played quite high up and Valencia doesn't leave the touchline so the middle of field is just wide open. Even players better than Cleverley would struggle with the wide open space and no movement. When Rooney has dropped deeper or when Jones has played alongside Cleverley he has been a bit better.Yes he'd do better in a 433. However there is no question of him adapting to play in a 442. He simply doesn't have the mentality or skills to do so.
He's still a decent squad player to have I think. For a couple of years, until someone from the youth teams makes a step up I guess.
I don't even think it is simply a 3 man or a 2 man midfield but just our general style of play. Carrick has sat really deep this season almost just in front of the defence and hardly moves. Rooney has played quite high up and Valencia doesn't leave the touchline so the middle of field is just wide open. Even players better than Cleverley would struggle with the wide open space and no movement. When Rooney has dropped deeper or when Jones has played alongside Cleverley he has been a bit better.
What doesn't make sense?http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26442914
The petition is pretty abhorrent, but nothing that Hodgson says there actually makes sense.
What doesn't make sense?
Oh. Well yes people don't think he is good enough but he is often singled out when everyone plays poorly. It happens at every team. There is always the one or two players that will get picked on and abused when things go wrong.The line about people blaming Cleverley for United's season.
It's pretty obvious that people just don't think he's any good, which is closer to the truth.
This is the Tom Cleverley I want to see.
Then he is in the wrong buisnessHodgson called him a "sensitive young man". Stuff like this is only going to make him play worse.
Hodgson called him a "sensitive young man". Stuff like this is only going to make him play worse.
I doubt he will. Homegrown rule and all that.He'll be off in the summer, I still think he could do a good job for us in a 3 man midfield but the knock in confidence and the fact that we are asking too much for a player of his quality means it has gotten to Kieran Richardson levels of backlash right now. He will go to a club lower down in the league and do a relatively good job.
I just think it's sickening that someone would actually make a petition to try and keep any player out of the world cup. Granted he hasn't had the best of seasons, he's already stated that, I just think to single out a player like that is disgusting, in my opinion.
This is why I get a bit pissed off with the amount of abuse our fans give him. We've already got every other fan giving him stick. Like I said before, he's not having a great season, but giving him abuse won't make it any better. We, as fans, in my opinion, should support our players through the good and bad times. Tom was part of a title winning season last season and played his part in us achieving that.
This is the Tom Cleverley I want to see.
Not sure what i'm supposed to be looking at here...
He looks very average here. I'll admit i've seen him play better than that but if this is him playing well then no wonder he's been taking criticism lately for his poor form.
a petition to end the petition https://t.co/igmF5ARatA
I'll tell you then. Cleverley, like I've always said, and many have identified, has never been the player to split open defences. What he has always been good at, however, is keeping possession and keeping the ball ticking over.
I showed that clip, although I could have probably got a better one, because as you can see (well you probably can't) it shows Cleverley's willingness to get on the ball and receive it anywhere against a very good Man City team last season.
This season, where he's admitted his confidence is very low, it's like he's afraid to receive the ball, and that's not the Cleverley of last year. This is basically what that video was all about.
So he's not outstanding at anything in particular except receiving the ball? That should be the minimum you expect from a footballer, never mind one who plays for Manchester United.
I have a feeling that the people who started it and most of those who have signed are just anti-united more than anti-Cleverley. Like you said -Idiots!Petition?? Wtf is wrong with people? What a ridiculous thing to do. He may not be suitable for making the squad but how fecking petty is that?
Idiots
You clearly don't get what I'm trying to say. If that's all you can see in the clip then I have nothing else to add to this discussion.
I have a feeling that the people who started it and most of those who have signed are just anti-united more than anti-Cleverley. Like you said -Idiots!
I'll tell you then. Cleverley, like I've always said, and many have identified, has never been the player to split open defences. What he has always been good at, however, is keeping possession and keeping the ball ticking over.
I showed that clip, although I could have probably got a better one, because as you can see (well you probably can't) it shows Cleverley's willingness to get on the ball and receive it anywhere against a very good Man City team last season.
This season, where he's admitted his confidence is very low, it's like he's afraid to receive the ball, and that's not the Cleverley of last year. This is basically what that video was all about.
I don't blame Cleverley, he shouldn't be a starter for us. Not his fault he's not up to it.
That looks like a much more confident Cleverley than one we currently see. He never looked afraid of doing anything, and as a team, it resembled the relatively greater freedom that Sir Alex gave to his players than what Moyes gives to his players.
Regardless, Cleverley hasn't done well, this season, and he has to make sure that he can impress Moyes. In the coming seasons, I think that it'll be very likely that Moyes won't give Tom much football as he'll look to get new players in. Tom, himself, has to make sure that he impresses Moyes. His own performances, this season, haven't been that great, and Moyes will act upon Tom's performances, this season.
The number of times Tom has hid under his own shell won't help him at all.
"What he has always been good at, however, is keeping possession and keeping the ball ticking over."
Despite the fact he gave the ball away and shot over by quite a distance. Just making 5 yard passes and being an outlet, which is essentially what you said just not as posh, is not up to the standard of what you expect of a United midfield player. I don't blame Cleverley, he shouldn't be a starter for us. Not his fault he's not up to it.