Toby Alderweireld

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think its aggressive compared to some of the other stuff posted on the Caf, no. Like I said he has done some things wrong but on a whole he has improved us massively and considering how some other chairman have done, Learner, Ashley, who ever was in charge at Leeds at the time, Blackburn's chicken family ENIC should be applauded. New training ground, new stadium, top four team all in less than 20 years without bank rolling us, I think that's at least a decent out come.
To each their own. You’re just another Spurs fan that can’t handle anything but undying praise for your club. Spurs board have done a good job to keep the club in profit. Super stuff. That doesn’t change the fact that Spurs have done relatively well of late because they finally got lucky with a manager.
 
I don't believe Levy is asking for £75M, I believe he is waiting till after the world cup to sell him, which would make pretty good sense personally.

Do you not risk de Ligt signing for someone else if you wait a whole month?
 
I didn’t know who Dalot was until two weeks ago. That’s why we have scouts, and don’t rely on fans. We always have more than one option.

Last year we wanted a central midfielder and a striker and had multiple options which were out in the open. We will be looking at other CB options.

You got a very good young player there, I think he will be very special and a steal at the fee you got him. Maybe not quite ready for a full season, but I think he will have a good showing this season.
 
To each their own. You’re just another Spurs fan that can’t handle anything but undying praise for your club. Spurs board have done a good job to keep the club in profit. Super stuff. That doesn’t change the fact that Spurs have done relatively well of late because they finally got lucky with a manager.

Ummmmmm I just said that ENIC haven't got it right all the time and have made mistakes, I can handle plenty of "well balanced criticism". You just seem to be another United fan who, due to the wealth of United and the legacy of Fergie, can't see anything else from another fans/clubs point of view.
 
Selling a 29 year old CB for 50 million when he will be gone for half that the following summer is not being bullied. Asking for 75 million is just unrealistic and no one is paying that.

The fact that Alderweireld does not want to stay at Spurs says more than you actually selling him.
I would actually prefer us to wait a year then. If he sucks this season then we saved 75m, and If he performs like he did the year before his injury then it is likely he is keeping that level for the 2-3 years, which will be good value at 25m. He will for sure be very hungry to join us then after Spurs wouldn't give him his dream move this summer.

CB is not really a position we desperately need to improve on immediately either. Smalling brings the stability and especially Bailly can improve heavily next season. Rojo might improve too, stranger things have happened.
 
I would actually prefer us to wait a year then. If he sucks this season then we saved 75m, and If he performs like he did the year before his injury then it is likely he is keeping that level for the 2-3 years, which will be good value at 25m. He will for sure be very hungry to join us then after Spurs wouldn't give him his dream move this summer.

CB is not really a position we desperately need to improve on immediately either. Smalling brings the stability and especially Bailly can improve heavily next season. Rojo might improve too, stranger things have happened.

There is no way we are paying 75 million. We could sign Lenglet for 35 million and then get Alderweireld for 25 next summer.
 
There is no way we are paying 75 million. We could sign Lenglet for 35 million and then get Alderweireld for 25 next summer.

Exactly. We could sign Lenglet and De Ligt for a combined £75m, so there is no way we are spending that on one 29 year old player, who is available for £25m in a year.
 
I didn’t know who Dalot was until two weeks ago. That’s why we have scouts, and don’t rely on fans. We always have more than one option.

Last year we wanted a central midfielder and a striker and had multiple options which were out in the open. We will be looking at other CB options.

Sure, you have other potential options, but Toby is your best option - and by some margin.
 
Say what? We are discussing Toby, who is potentially available for sale to United. There's no analogy with Ronaldo here, because he was never the subject of any potential deal between United and Spurs.
That isn't an analogy mate, it is your logic. At 75m or whatever, he isn't available. Nobody is going to entertain that. You said we should pay up, and if not:
And meanwhile United would lose out on the best CB they could get, which weakens a rival.
Which is silly, don't you see? You can't tell me Spurs made United weaker by not selling them a good player? If that is something you actually believe and wont retract then please let me know. An actual analogy for that; it would be like saying United are strengthening you by not buying Alderweireld. Upside down logic, mate.

Spurs will be significantly weaker if they sell him, as they won't be able to attract a ready made player on his level. If they ask for too much and waits too long, they will lose out on their targets to replace him. If they keep him, they might have an unhappy player which may or may not play his best for you again. United have not been weakened nor will strengthen Spurs in any scenario.
 
Sure, you have other potential options, but Toby is your best option - and by some margin.

He is nearing 30, coming off injury problems and overpriced. What exactly makes him the best option?

Added to the fact that centre back is not exactly a priority for us, I would imagine we are hardly in a panic over the whole thing.
 
He is nearing 30, coming off injury problems and overpriced. What exactly makes him the best option?

Added to the fact that centre back is not exactly a priority for us, I would imagine we are hardly in a panic over the whole thing.

Because he's better than any other CB you could realistically sign. Moreover he's Prem proven, experienced, settled in England and would walk into your first XI.

If you think you can do better than him then good luck to you.
 
Ummmmmm I just said that ENIC haven't got it right all the time and have made mistakes, I can handle plenty of "well balanced criticism". You just seem to be another United fan who, due to the wealth of United and the legacy of Fergie, can't see anything else from another fans/clubs point of view.
I’m not sure how saying Spurs have done well because they got a good manager is evidence of that. How well were Spurs doing when they sacked Juande Ramos? You’re welcome to continue stretching though.
 
Because he's better than any other CB you could realistically sign. Moreover he's Prem proven, experienced, settled in England and would walk into your first XI.

If you think you can do better than him then good luck to you.

Does not address the fact that he is nearing 30 and coming off a serious injury.

Milan Skriniar, Koulibaly and Marquinhos are options I would rather go with. Koulibaly specifically is a better player and younger. If we are going for someone for a short term option I would rather buy Bonucci.

All that said, I don't think we particularly need a centre back and if we were going to realistically buy one of your players I would want it to be Danny Rose.
 
Does not address the fact that he is nearing 30 and coming off a serious injury.

Milan Skriniar, Koulibaly and Marquinhos are options I would rather go with. Koulibaly specifically is a better player and younger. If we are going for someone for a short term option I would rather buy Bonucci.

All that said, I don't think we particularly need a centre back and if we were going to realistically buy one of your players I would want it to be Danny Rose.
Why would you want another injury prone player
 
Why would you want another injury prone player

As far as I know he has had one major injury, not ideal but he is a very good player. I don't really think there are many great left backs around let alone ones who are available and have been reasonably open about there desire to play here.
 
I’m not sure how saying Spurs have done well because they got a good manager is evidence of that. How well were Spurs doing when they sacked Juande Ramos? You’re welcome to continue stretching though.

We were doing shit, it was a terrible appointment, what's your point? Santini and Gross were shit too, although TBH all had good credentials. That doesn't alter the fact that as a club we have grown massively since 2001, when e could easily have done a Villa or Newcastle.
 
We were doing shit, it was a terrible appointment, what's your point? Santini and Gross were shit too, although TBH all had good credentials. That doesn't alter the fact that as a club we have grown massively since 2001, when e could easily have done a Villa or Newcastle.
The point is what it has always been. Spurs are ‘competing’ with teams with higher resources because they finally have a manager capable of doing that. No matter how good Levy was you weren’t doing it regularly before Pochettino. So therefore we’re back to my original point. It’s got a lot more to do with getting lucky at the tenth time of asking.
 
Last edited:
The point is what it has always been. Spurs are ‘competing’ with teams with higher resources because they finally have a manager capable of doing that. No matter how good Levy was you weren’t doing it regularly beforehand Pochettino. So therefore we’re back to my original point. It’s got a lot more to do with getting lucky at the tenth time of asking.

You are ignoring so much in between, we were building up year after year, with the odd setback. Harry got us in the top 4 and could have again if it wasn't for Chelsea winning the CL. You are completely ignoring the infrastructure that has been put in place and the yearly increase in finances. You keep saying we got "lucky" with Poch, I don't see it. You should know how difficult it is even for the biggest clubs to get it right with managers. Anyway this isn't the thread for it.

If you want to believe ENIC has nothing to do with where the club is ATM that's your prerogative, I disagree.
 
Because he's better than any other CB you could realistically sign. Moreover he's Prem proven, experienced, settled in England and would walk into your first XI.

If you think you can do better than him then good luck to you.

We could get Boateng for 70m and he's a better CB.
 
Because he's better than any other CB you could realistically sign. Moreover he's Prem proven, experienced, settled in England and would walk into your first XI.

If you think you can do better than him then good luck to you.

We can, hope you keep your expensive CB and he walks away for free.
 
Why does everyone get hung up on rumoured transfer fees? You're arguing about hot air.
 
I dont care when it is, I'm not expecting him to come here on a free. But the kind of money you guys want freezes him off the market so I hope nobody pays it

I don't think Levy is expecting £75M or anywhere near it from anyone else, its clear we are interested in Martial so why should we negotiate when United won't? Also before anyone pipes up I am not suggesting a swap deal. Id snap the hand off Woody if the £55M offer is on the table, Martial or no Martial. If we get £70 for Toby I would actually laugh myself silly at how stupid and crazy the game has become for some clubs.
 
Last edited:
A year is a very long time in football, so talk of coming back in a year isn't as obvious a strategy as it sounds.

But it definitely sounds like we need to walk right away from this one. Way too high fees being talked for a guy who can't guarantee fitness. We talk about this with Rose and Bale, so it's got to be a big factor with this guy too. Especially before you apply the "United centre back injury jinx"
 
You are ignoring so much in between, we were building up year after year, with the odd setback. Harry got us in the top 4 and could have again if it wasn't for Chelsea winning the CL. You are completely ignoring the infrastructure that has been put in place and the yearly increase in finances. You keep saying we got "lucky" with Poch, I don't see it. You should know how difficult it is even for the biggest clubs to get it right with managers. Anyway this isn't the thread for it.

If you want to believe ENIC has nothing to do with where the club is ATM that's your prerogative, I disagree.

In truth your increase in finances is almost exclusively down to the TV deals negotiated by Scudamore, so I'm not sure Levy or ENIC can take any credit for that.

In fact Levy's success commercially over the past decade has been nothing short of an abomination. One of the biggest clubs in London and when you compare the deals Chelsea have been doing to Tottenham it's quite staggering.
 
A year is a very long time in football, so talk of coming back in a year isn't as obvious a strategy as it sounds.

But it definitely sounds like we need to walk right away from this one. Way too high fees being talked for a guy who can't guarantee fitness. We talk about this with Rose and Bale, so it's got to be a big factor with this guy too. Especially before you apply the "United centre back injury jinx"

Great sum up. It's just not worth it, and it's not like United's stuck up in a corner on this one. There's a World Cup coming up, that usually produces new prospects and stars. Even VNL could come good with a good Swedish run and be that ball playing cb we need.
 
Last edited:
That would be in 2 years time.

Two years without being motivated and possibly causing unrest, certainly not giving 100% as he would feel Tottenham is no longer his club. Would be a terrible decision now that he wants to win trophies with a bigger and better club - either in England or abroad.
 
In truth your increase in finances is almost exclusively down to the TV deals negotiated by Scudamore, so I'm not sure Levy or ENIC can take any credit for that.

In fact Levy's success commercially over the past decade has been nothing short of an abomination. One of the biggest clubs in London and when you compare the deals Chelsea have been doing to Tottenham it's quite staggering.

I think you should go and have a look at that again, Chelsea have had a billionaire backer(not exactly the cleanest one in town either), its much easier for them. You pick one club, with a sugar daddy, to win an argument, that wont wash. Again you are talking absolute rubbish and I really don't see why you want to keep it going, but that's your own agenda. TV revenue is a given for all clubs revenue increasing :lol:.
 
Two years without being motivated and possibly causing unrest, certainly not giving 100% as he would feel Tottenham is no longer his club. Would be a terrible decision now that he wants to win trophies with a bigger and better club - either in England or abroad.

Never said it wouldn't, I was simply saying he wont be a free transfer for 2 years....
 
What an ignorant post, simply mind boggling, if Levy has such a "juvenile business tactic" how has he the club in a position it is in, competing with clubs with much higher resources? Why should Levy be bullied by United, well within his right to hold firm, if Levy just sold him 99% of United fans would come out with the "Spurs are a selling club" its utter BS. If you don't want him move on to another target and stop crying about mean old Levy.

I'm not talking about United. I never was.

Spurs are where they are in spite of Levy's transfer business. Pochettino is a great manager. The academy is very good. Harry Kane is a once in a lifetime academy product.

What is mind boggling or ignorant about reinforcing the fact that Spurs have poor starts to the season in relation to their finishes?

Is is pot luck? Or could it be because the squad has still not been settled prior to the season beginning?
 
I'm not talking about United. I never was.

Spurs are where they are in spite of Levy's transfer business. Pochettino is a great manager. The academy is very good. Harry Kane is a once in a lifetime academy product.

What is mind boggling or ignorant about reinforcing the fact that Spurs have poor starts to the season in relation to their finishes?

Is is pot luck? Or could it be because the squad has still not been settled prior to the season beginning?

We cant afford to compete with the big boys in transfer fees, we have to wait. I live with it. Oh and if Harry had his shooting boots on earlier we would probably do better.
 
I think you should go and have a look at that again, Chelsea have had a billionaire backer(not exactly the cleanest one in town either), its much easier for them. You pick one club, with a sugar daddy, to win an argument, that wont wash. Again you are talking absolute rubbish and I really don't see why you want to keep it going, but that's your own agenda. TV revenue is a given for all clubs revenue increasing :lol:.

Your commercial revenue was £73m for the 16/17 season. If you don't want to compare Levy's performance to Chelsea let's compare it to Liverpool who don't even have the benefit of being in London. Their commercial revenue was £136m or a shade under double.

The only revenue stream that Levy is responsible for has grown at a tragic rate in comparison to every other good team and the only revenue stream that has grown at a fantastic rate is TV revenue which is negotiated by others.

Pochettino is responsible for getting CL revenue, BT are responsible for the amount of said revenue and Scudamore is responsible for the PL revenue.

The only source of revenue changeable by a good CEO as a portion of total revenue stood at 24% and £73m. Compared with United 47% and £279m, Chelsea 38% and £140m, Liverpool 38% and £139m; and Arsenal 28% and £117m. Spurs are light-years away because Levy is more bothered about squeezing a few million out of transfers than sorting out his commercial department. His take it or leave it attitude that sometimes works in selling and buying players hugely turns off sponsors. Hence the £20+m stadium deal he was touting still being a fairytale.

That's of course ignoring City's increases which are down to the owners mates.
 
Last edited:
I don't think Levy is expecting £75M or anywhere near it from anyone else, its clear we are interested in Martial so why should we negotiate when United won't? Also before anyone pipes up I am not suggesting a swap deal. Id snap the hand off Woody if the £55M offer is on the table, Martial or no Martial. If we get £70 for Toby I would actually laugh myself silly at how stupid and crazy the game has become for some clubs.

I'd be annoyed at us paying 55 million too, but then again I guess I am quite disillusioned with the state of transfer fees. I don't consider him in the same league as Van Dijk and I'm not sure there are too many other, more similar examples of CBs who cost anywhere near that amount. Maybe you could say Stones and Laporte, but they were young CBs who City must believe will become a lot better than they are currently. Thats not the case with Alderweireld as he's 29.

I think he's a different style of CB rather than an improvement of what we have. And yes that change of style could suit us so I don't mind us signing him, but I'd honestly prefer it if we found someone else with his ball skills and took a chance on them instead.
 
Ricky Sacks @RickSpur

[@ESPN] understands Man Utd are ‘on the brink of succumbing’ to Tottenham Hotspur’s minimum fee demand for Toby Alderweireld.

These claims are now backed up by Belgian paper [Het Laatste] which suggests a €79.8million transfer could be ‘tied up’ in the coming days.#THFC #COYS
 
Status
Not open for further replies.